PreprintCited by 3Flood Risk Assessment and ManagementEnvironmental Justice and Health DisparitiesUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

Associations between Historical Redlining and Current and Future Exposure to Stormwater Flooding in New York City

Open access
Steinberg-McElroy, Ivy, Tangtrakul, Korin, Alizadehtazi, Bita, Rosenzweig, Bernice R., Gurian, Patrick L., Montalto, Franco·2023·SSRN Electronic Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.4571518

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinberg-McElroy, I., Tangtrakul, K., Alizadehtazi, B., Rosenzweig, B. R., Gurian, P. L., & Montalto, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Sarah Lawrence College (US)
Corresponding author
Montalto, Franco
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386706137
Cited by
3
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Keywords
historical redlining, pluvial flooding, flood risk, socioeconomic segregation, neighborhood disinvestment, racial discrimination in lending, climate change adaptation, flood vulnerability, New York City, census tracts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review