Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring the Capability to Raise Revenue - Process and Output Dimensions and Their Application to the Zambia Revenue Authority

von Soest, Christian·2006·SSRN Electronic Journal
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.951933
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.951933

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Richard M Bird, 2003, Administrative Dimensions of Tax Reform
  2. Nils / Boesen, 2004, Between Naivety and Cynicism. A Pragmatic Approach to Donor Support for Public-Sector Capacity Development. Evaluation Department Working Paper. 4. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs / Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA)
  3. Nils / Boesen, 2005, A Results-Oriented Approach to Capacity Change. Evaluation Department Working Paper. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs / Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA)
  4. Lybrand Coopers, 1992, Report for the Ministry of Finance, Government of the Republic of Zambia. Lusaka: Coopers and Lybrand Zambia, Draft Final Report, 1
  5. De Wulf, 2005, The Role of Information Technology in Customs Modernization, Customs Modernization Handbook, 285
  6. Simon / Delay, 1999, Reforming Revenue AdministrationLessons from Experience. A Study for the Department for International Development (DFID)
  7. Odd-Helge / Fjeldstad, 2000, Taxation, Aid and Democracy. An Agenda for Research in African Countries. CMI Working, 10.1163/_afco_asc_1595 · DOI
  8. Jit B S Gill, 2003, The Nuts and Bolts of Revenue Administration Reform World Bank
  9. Malcolm Gillis, 1989, Tax Reform: Lessons from Postwar Experience in Developing Countries, 492
  10. John / Gray, 2001, Evaluation of Revenue Projects, Department for International Development (DFID), 1
  11. John / Gray, 2001, Evaluation of the Zambia Revenue Authority Consolidation Project, DFID Evaluation of Revenue Projects
  12. Sanjeev / Gupta, 2003, Foreign Aid and Revenue Response: Does the Composition of Aid Matter? IMF Working Paper, 20
  13. 2006, Third Review Under the Three-Year Arrangement Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, Request for Waiver and Modification of Performance Criterion, and Financing Assurances Review, Zambia: 2005 Article IV Consultation
  14. Public Information Notice and Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Zambia
  15. 1998, Transparency International (TI) Corruption Perceptions Index, 10.1787/888932539574 · DOI
  16. John M Kasanga, 1996, Study of 'Enclave' Approach to Tax and Customs Administration in Zambia
  17. Robert A Lebaube, 1992, Assisting Taxpayers in Meeting Their Obligations Under the Law, 310
  18. Margaret Levi, 1988, Of Rule and Revenue
  19. Zambia Republic Of, 1969, Delivered on 30.01.1969. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance, Government of the Republic of Zambia, Budget Address
  20. Zambia Republic Of, 2001, Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and Economic Development, Government of the Republic of Zambia
  21. Susan Rose-Ackerman, 2004, The Challenge of Poor Governance and Corruption Copenhagen Consensus, Environmental Assessment Institute
  22. La�la Smith, 2003, The Power of Politics: The Performance of the South African Revenue Service and Some of its Implications, Policy: Issues and Actors -Research Report. 2. Johannesburg: Centre for Policy Research (CPR)
  23. Wayne Thirsk, 1997, Overview: The Substance and Process of Tax Reform in Eight Developing Countries, Tax Reform in Developing Countries, 1
  24. 2004, Times of Zambia (30.3.2004): Explain Non-Payment of Interest on MPs Car Loans -Auditor General, in: Times of Zambia, 30
  25. 2002, State of Corruption Report. Lusaka: Transparency International Zambia (TIZ). von Soest: Measuring the Capability to Raise Revenue, TIZ
  26. 2006, The African State and the Capability to Raise Revenue. A Comparative Study of the Tax Administration in Zambia and Botswana. Doctoral dissertation
  27. Zambia Daily Mail, 2003, State Loses 10% Tax', in: Zambia Daily Mail, 3.9, 9
  28. Zambia Daily Mail, 2004, ZRA Boss is Car Ring Mastermind?, in: Zambia Daily Mail, 4
  29. 2004, Zambia Daily Mail (30.3.2004): Police Holds 3 ZRA Officials Over Car Theft Syndicate, in: Zambia Daily Mail, 30
  30. 1999, Lusaka: Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA), ZRA
  31. 2002, Lusaka: Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA), ZRA
  32. 2003, Lusaka: Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA), ZRA
  33. 2004, Lusaka: Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA), ZRA

Cited by

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
von Soest, C.
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006
ISSN
1556-5068
DOI
10.2139/ssrn.951933
Cited by
2
References
61
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.