Cited by 41Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingSpeech and dialogue systems

On the Limit of English Conversational Speech Recognition

Open access
Tüske, Zoltán, Saon, George, Kingsbury, Brian·2021·Interspeech 2021

Abstract

In our previous work we demonstrated that a single headed attention encoder-decoder model is able to reach state-of-the-art results in conversational speech recognition. In this paper, we further improve the results for both Switchboard 300 and 2000. Through use of an improved optimizer, speaker vector embeddings, and alternative speech representations we reduce the recognition errors of our LSTM system on Switchboard-300 by 4% relative. Compensation of the decoder model with the probability ratio approach allows more efficient integration of an external language model, and we report 5.9% and 11.5% WER on the SWB and CHM parts of Hub5'00 with very simple LSTM models. Our study also considers the recently proposed conformer, and more advanced self-attention based language models. Overall, the conformer shows similar performance to the LSTM; nevertheless, their combination and decoding with an improved LM reaches a new record on Switchboard-300, 5.0% and 10.0% WER on SWB and CHM. Our findings are also confirmed on Switchboard-2000, and a new state of the art is reported, practically reaching the limit of the benchmark.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21437/interspeech.2021-211

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The state-of-the-art for English automated speech recognition (e.g., smartphone dictation) has an approximate 5% word error rate.

    “the state-of-the-art for English automated speech recognition (e.g., smartphone dictation) has an approximate 5% word error rate 28”

    From An Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech Neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Abstract reports a state-of-the-art 5.0% word error rate on the Switchboard portion of a conversational-speech benchmark. The Experimental setup specifies English conversational telephony speech, and the Abstract reports 10.0% on another benchmark portion. These results do not establish an approximate 5% rate for English ASR generally or smartphone dictation. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. D. Bahdanau, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio, "Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate," in ICLR, 2015.
  2. D. Krueger et al., "Zoneout: regularizing RNNs by randomly preserving hidden activations," in ICLR, 2017.
  3. I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter, "Decoupled weight decay regulariza- tion," in ICLR, 2019.
  4. K. Irie et al., "Training language models for long-span cross- sentence evaluation," in ASRU, 2019, pp. 419-426.
  5. A. Hannun et al., "Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to- end speech recognition," 2014. [Online]. Available: http: //arxiv.org/abs/1412.5567
  6. Y. Nesterov, "A method of solving a convex programming problem with convergence rate O(1/k 2 )," in Soviet Mathematics Doklady, vol. 27, no. 2, 1983, pp. 372-376.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tüske, Z., Saon, G., & Kingsbury, B.
Affiliations
IBM (United States) (US)
Venue
Interspeech 2021
Publisher
ISCA
Published
2021-08-30
Pages
2062-2066
ISSN
2308-457X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3157428800
Cited by
41
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Interspeech (USB) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
conversational speech recognition, switchboards, conformational isomers, LSTM, speech representation, word error rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review