The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intonation and interpretation: phonetics and phonology
Open accessAbstract
Intonational meaning is located in two components of language, the phonetic implementation and the intonational grammar.The phonetic implementation is widely used for the expression of universal meanings that derive from 'biological codes', meaning dimensions based on aspects of the production process of pitch variation.Three codes are identified, Ohala's Frequency Code, the Effort Code and the Production Code.In each case, 'informational' meanings (which relate to the message) are identified, while for the first two codes also 'affective' meanings (relating to the state of the speaker) are discussed.Speech communities will vary in the extent to which they employ those meanings, and in the choices they make when they conflict.What they will never do, however, is change the natural form-function relations that they embody.By contrast, grammaticalised meanings often mimic the natural meanings, but linguistic change may create quite arbitrary form-meaning relations when forms are phonologised, and the semantics is systematised.English grammaticalised intonational meaning concerns information status.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ladd, D. R. (1996) · Cited by 2,742
Greenberg, J. H., Ferguson, C. A., & Moravcsik, E. A. (1978) · Cited by 1,824
The Phonology of Standard Chinese
Duanmu, S. (2007) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199215782.001.0001 · Cited by 1,157
On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds
Morton, E. S. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283219 · Cited by 1,005
The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse
Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Hirschberg, J. (1990) · doi:10.7916/d8kd24fp · Cited by 830
An Ethological Perspective on Common Cross-Language Utilization of F₀ of Voice
Ohala, J. J. (1984) · Phonetica · doi:10.1159/000261706 · Cited by 751
Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English
Lieberman, P., & Crystal, D. (1976) · Language · doi:10.2307/412577 · Cited by 705
Intonation, Perception and Language
Pollack, I., & Lieberman, P. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421071 · Cited by 594
de Jong, K. J. (1995) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.412275 · Cited by 543
Bengali intonational phonology
Hayes, B., & Lahiri, A. (1991) · Natural Language and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1007/bf00133326 · Cited by 539
Cited by
Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication
Wharton, T. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511635649 · Cited by 450
Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements
Ogden, R. (2006) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.011 · Cited by 301
Lai, C. (2010) · Interspeech 2010 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2010-429 · Cited by 29
Prosodic Adaptation in Language Learning
Nilsenová, M., & Swerts, M. (2012) · Educational Linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3883-6_6 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Gussenhoven, C.
- Venue
- Speech Prosody 2002
- Publisher
- ISCA
- Published
- 2002-04-11
- Pages
- 47-57
- ISSN
- 2333-2042 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136752178
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intonation and interpretation: phonetics and phonology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21437/speechprosody.2002-7
- The paper
- Gussenhoven, C. (2002). Intonation and interpretation: phonetics and phonology. Speech Prosody 2002. https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2002-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.