The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous Fluorescence Monitoring of Rapid Cycle DNA Amplification
Open accessAbstract
Rapid cycle DNA amplification was continuously monitored by three different fluorescence techniques. Fluorescence was monitored by (i) the double-strand-specific dye SYBR Green I, (ii) a decrease in fluorescein quenching by rhodamine after exonuclease cleavage of a dual-labeled hydrolysis probe and (iii) resonance energy transfer of fluorescein to Cy5 by adjacent hybridization probes. Fluorescence data acquired once per cycle provides rapid absolute quantification of initial template copy number. The sensitivity of SYBR Green I detection is limited by nonspecific product formation. Use of a single exonuclease hydrolysis probe or two adjacent hybridization probes offers increasing levels of specificity. In contrast to fluorescence measurement once per cycle, continuous monitoring throughout each cycle monitors the temperature dependence of fluorescence. The cumulative, irreversible signal of hydrolysis probes can be distinguished easily from the temperature-dependent, reversible signal of hybridization probes. By using SYBR Green I, product denaturation, annealing and extension can be followed within each cycle. Substantial product-to-product annealing occurs during later amplification cycles, suggesting that product annealing is a major cause of the plateau effect. Continuous within-cycle monitoring allows rapid optimization of amplification conditions and should be particularly useful in developing new, standardized clinical assays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase
Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., & Erlich, H. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2448875 · Cited by 17,719
Cited by
The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments
Bustin, S. A., Benes, V., Garson, J. A., Hellemans, J., Huggett, J., Kubista, M., Mueller, R., Nolan, T., Pfaffl, M. W., Shipley, G. L., et al. (2009) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797 · Cited by 16,303
Self-citationHigh-Resolution Genotyping by Amplicon Melting Analysis Using LCGreen
Wittwer, C. T., Reed, G. H., Gundry, C. N., Vandersteen, J. G., & Pryor, R. J. (2003) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/49.6.853 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationA second class of chemosensory receptors in the olfactory epithelium
Liberles, S. D., & Buck, L. B. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05066 · Cited by 791
PrimerBank: a PCR primer database for quantitative gene expression analysis, 2012 update
Wang, X., Spandidos, A., Wang, H., & Seed, B. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1013 · Cited by 720
High-Resolution DNA Melting Analysis for Simple and Efficient Molecular Diagnostics
Reed, G. H., Kent, J. O., & Wittwer, C. T. (2007) · Pharmacogenomics · doi:10.2217/14622416.8.6.597 · Cited by 678
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wittwer, C. T., Herrmann, M. G., Moss, A. A., & Rasmussen, R. P.
- Venue
- BioTechniques
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 314-320
- ISSN
- 0736-6205 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-9818
- OpenAlex
- W1594653092
- Cited by
- 1,274
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous Fluorescence Monitoring of Rapid Cycle DNA Amplification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2144/000114043
- The paper
- Wittwer, C. T., Herrmann, M. G., Moss, A. A., & Rasmussen, R. P. (2013). Continuous Fluorescence Monitoring of Rapid Cycle DNA Amplification. BioTechniques. https://doi.org/10.2144/000114043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.