The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal management of elderly cancer patients: usefulness of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer is common in older patients, who raise specific treatment challenges due to aging-related, organ-specific physiologic changes and the presence in most cases of comorbidities capable of affecting treatment tolerance and outcomes. Identifying comorbid conditions and physiologic changes due to aging allows oncologists to better assess the risk/benefit ratio and to adjust the treatment accordingly. Conducting a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is one approach developed for this purpose. We reviewed the evidence on the usefulness of CGA for assessing health problems and predicting cancer treatment outcomes, functional decline, morbidity, and mortality in older patients with solid malignancies. METHODS: We searched Medline for articles published in English between January 1, 2000 and April 14, 2014, and reporting prospective observational or interventional studies of CGA feasibility or effectiveness in patients aged ≥65 years with solid malignancies. We identified studies with at least 100 patients, a multivariate analysis, and assessments of at least five of the following CGA domains: nutrition, cognition, mood, functional status, mobility and falls, polypharmacy, comorbidities, and social environment. RESULTS: All types of CGA identified a large number of unrecognized health problems capable of interfering with cancer treatment. CGA results influenced 21%-49% of treatment decisions. All CGA domains were associated with chemotoxicity or survival in at least one study. The abnormalities that most often predicted mortality and chemotoxicity were functional impairment, malnutrition, and comorbidities. CONCLUSION: The CGA uncovers numerous health problems in elderly patients with cancer and can affect treatment decisions. Functional impairment, malnutrition, and comorbidities are independently associated with chemotoxicity and/or survival. Only three randomized published studies evaluated the effectiveness of CGA-linked interventions. Further research into the effectiveness of the CGA in improving patient outcomes is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., Wieland, G. D., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Adams, J. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-v · Cited by 1,974
Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study
Hurria, A., Togawa, K., Mohile, S. G., Owusu, C., Klepin, H. D., Gross, C. P., Lichtman, S. M., Gajra, A., Bhatia, S., Katheria, V., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.34.7625 · Cited by 1,841
Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients:
Extermann, M., Aapro, M., Bernabei, R., Cohen, H. J., Droz, J.-P., Lichtman, S., Mor, V., Monfardini, S., Repetto, L., Sørbye, L., et al. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.06.003 · Cited by 1,098
Ellis, G., Whitehead, M. A., Robinson, D., O'Neill, D., & Langhorne, P. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d6553 · Cited by 1,068
McCorkle (2000) · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03886.x · Cited by 321
Cited by
Mohile, S. G., Dale, W., Somerfield, M. R., Schonberg, M. A., Boyd, C. M., Burhenn, P. S., Canin, B., Cohen, H. J., Holmes, H. M., Hopkins, J. O., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2018.78.8687 · Cited by 1,479
Pilotto, A., Cella, A., Pilotto, A., Daragjati, J., Veronese, N., Musacchio, C., Mello, A. M., Logroscino, G., Padovani, A., Prete, C., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2016.11.004 · Cited by 454
Canoui‐Poitrine, F., Reinald, N., Laurent, M., Guery, E., Caillet, P., David, J., Tournigand, C., Lagrange, J., Bastuji‐Garin, S., Lemogne, C., et al. (2016) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3886 · Cited by 71
Self-citationNaruishi, K., Kunita, A., Kubo, K., Nagata, T., Takashiba, S., & Adachi, S. (2014) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s73388 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Paillaud, E., Caillet, P., Laurent, M., Bastuji-Garin, S., Liuu, E., Lagrange, J.-L., Culine, S., & Canoui-Poitrine, F.
- Venue
- Clinical Interventions in Aging
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 1645
- ISSN
- 1176-9092 (ISSN-L)
- 1178-1998
- OpenAlex
- W2073264916
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal management of elderly cancer patients: usefulness of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2147/cia.s57849
- The paper
- Paillaud, E., Caillet, P., Laurent, M., Bastuji-Garin, S., Liuu, E., Lagrange, J.-L., Culine, S., & Canoui-Poitrine, F. (2014). Optimal management of elderly cancer patients: usefulness of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. Clinical Interventions in Aging. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s57849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.