Cited by 9Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsData Mining and Machine Learning Applications

Identifying Metabolic Syndrome Easily and Cost Effectively Using Non-Invasive Methods with Machine Learning Models

Open access
Xu, Wei, Zhang, Zikai, Hu, Kerong, Fang, Ping, Li, Ran, Kong, Dehong, Xuan, Miao, Yue, Yang +2 more·2023·Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to employ machine learning (ML) models utilizing non-invasive factors to achieve early and low-cost identification of MetS in a large physical examination population. Patients and Methods: The study enrolled 9171 participants who underwent physical examinations at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital in 2009 and 2019, to determine MetS based on criteria established by the Chinese Diabetes Society. Non-invasive characteristics such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were collected and used as input variables to train and evaluate ML models for MetS identification. Several ML models were used for MetS identification, including logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbors algorithm (k-NN), naive bayesian (NB), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM). Results: Our ML models all showed good performance in the 10-fold cross-validation except for the SVM model. In the external validation, the NB model exhibited the best performance with an AUC of 0.976, accuracy of 0.923, sensitivity of 98.32%, and specificity of 91.32%. Conclusion: This study proposed a new non-invasive method for early and low-cost identification of MetS by using ML models. This approach has the potential to serve as a highly sensitive, convenient, and cost-effective tool for large-scale MetS screening.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/dmso.s413829

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning has demonstrated effectiveness in the early detection and cost-effective screening of metabolic syndrome.

    “Notably, ML has demonstrated its effectiveness in the early detection and cost-effective screening of MetS [11].”

    From Machine learning with the body roundness index and associated indicators: a new approach to predicting metabolic syndrome (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion reports strong detection performance for an ML model and describes its use for early screening. The Abstract Conclusion calls it a method for early, low-cost identification, but says it has the *potential* to be a cost-effective screening tool; it does not establish cost-effective screening as a demonstrated outcome. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]Shamrat FM, Chakraborty S, Billah MM, Das P, Ranjan R. A comprehensive study on pre-pruning and post- pruning methods of decision tree classification algorithm. In: 5th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI 2021); 2021. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9452898/.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, W., Zhang, Z., Hu, K., Fang, P., Li, R., Kong, D., Xuan, M., Yue, Y., She, D., & Xue, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • She, Dunmin
  • Xue, Ying
Venue
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
Published
2023-07
Volume
Volume 16
Pages
2141-2151
ISSN
1178-7007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384562195
Cited by
9
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81974105)
  • Tongji University
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, non-invasive screening, machine learning classification, body mass index, blood pressure, early detection, cost-effective screening, Naive Bayes classifier, physical examination population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review