Cited by 23Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

Multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) for imaging the particle size-dependent intratumoral distribution of polymeric micelles

Open access
Cong, Zhaoqing, Yang, Feifei, Cao, Li, Wen, Han, Fu, Taotao, Ma, Siqi, Liu, Chunyu, Quan, Lihui +1 more·2018·International Journal of Nanomedicine

Abstract

Purpose: This study proposes the utilization of multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) to investigate the intratumoral distribution of polymeric micelles and effect of size on the biodistribution and antitumor efficacy (ATE). Materials and methods: Docetaxel and/or optoacoustic agent-loaded polymeric micelles (with diameters of 22, 48, and 124 nm) were prepared using amphiphilic block copolymers poly (ethylene glycol) methyl ether-block-poly (D,L lactide) (PEG 2000 –PDLLA x ). Subcutaneous 4T1 tumor-bearing mice were monitored with MSOT imaging and IVIS ® Spectrum in vivo live imaging after tail vein injection of micelles. The in vivo results and ex vivo confocal imaging results were then compared. Next, ATE of the three micelles was found and compared. Results: We found that MSOT imaging offers spatiotemporal and quantitative information on intratumoral distribution of micelles in living animals. All the polymeric micelles rapidly extravasated into tumor site after intravenous injection, but only the 22-nm micelle preferred to distribute into the inner tumor tissues, leading to a superior ATE than that of 48- and 124-nm micelles. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that MSOT is theranostically a powerful imaging modality, offering quantitative information on size-dependent spatiotemporal distribution patterns after the extravasation of nanomedicine from tumor blood vessels. Keywords: multispectral optoacoustic tomography, MSOT, polymeric micelle, in vivo imaging, intratumoral distribution, particle size, tumor model

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ijn.s185726

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous studies have shown that the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects of micelles cause them to preferentially collect in leaky circulatory beds of solid tumors.

    “Numerous studies have shown that the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects of micelles cause them to preferentially collect in leaky circulatory beds of solid tumors.38”

    From Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cong, Z., Yang, F., Cao, L., Wen, H., Fu, T., Ma, S., Liu, C., Quan, L., & Liao, Y.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
Liao, Yonghong
Venue
International Journal of Nanomedicine
Published
2018-12
Volume
Volume 13
Pages
8549-8560
ISSN
  • 1176-9114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2013
OpenAlex
W2903792383
Cited by
23
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nanomedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (2016-I2M-1-012, -I2M-1-012, 81603052)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Keywords
multispectral optoacoustic tomography, polymeric micelles, intratumoral distribution, particle size dependence, tissue distribution, antitumor efficacy, docetaxel, 4T1 breast tumor, extravasation, theranostics, nanomedicine
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Micelles, Neoplasms, Particle Size, Polyethylene Glycols, Polymers, Tissue Distribution, Tomography, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Cell Line, Tumor, Photoacoustic Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review