Cited by 29Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Priority interventions to improve the management of chronic non-cancer pain in primary care: a participatory research of the ACCORD program

Open access
Lalonde, Lyne, Choinière, Manon, Martin, Elisabeth, Lévesque, Lise, Hudon, Eveline, Bélanger, Danielle, Perreault, Sylvie, Lacasse, Anaïs +1 more·2015·Journal of Pain Research

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is evidence that the management of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) in primary care is far from being optimal. A 1-day workshop was held to explore the perceptions of key actors regarding the challenges and priority interventions to improve CNCP management in primary care. METHODS: Using the Chronic Care Model as a conceptual framework, physicians (n=6), pharmacists (n=6), nurses (n=6), physiotherapists (n=6), psychologists (n=6), pain specialists (n=6), patients (n=3), family members (n=3), decision makers and managers (n=4), and pain researchers (n=7) took part in seven focus groups and five nominal groups. RESULTS: Challenges identified in focus group discussions were related to five dimensions: knowledge gap, "work in silos", lack of awareness that CNCP represents an important clinical problem, difficulties in access to health professionals and services, and patient empowerment needs. Based on the nominal group discussions, the following priority interventions were identified: interdisciplinary continuing education, interdisciplinary treatment approach, regional expert leadership, creation and definition of care paths, and patient education programs. CONCLUSION: Barriers to optimal management of CNCP in primary care are numerous. Improving its management cannot be envisioned without considering multifaceted interventions targeting several dimensions of the Chronic Care Model and focusing on both clinicians and patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/jpr.s78177

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interventions targeted at both clinicians and patients improved management in patients with chronic pain.

    “Research exploring interventions targeted at both clinicians and patients demonstrated improved management in patients with chronic pain [67].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lalonde, L., Choinière, M., Martin, E., Lévesque, L., Hudon, E., Bélanger, D., Perreault, S., Lacasse, A., & Laliberté, M.-C.
Affiliations
  • Sanofi (Canada) (CA)
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Centre Integre de Sante et de Services Sociaux de Laval (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (CA)
  • AbbVie Canada (Canada) (CA)
Corresponding author
Lalonde, Lyne
Venue
Journal of Pain Research
Published
2015-04
Volume
8
Pages
203
ISSN
1178-7090 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1552059934
Cited by
29
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Depositum (Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
chronic non-cancer pain, primary care, Chronic Care Model, stakeholder perspectives, multidisciplinary care, continuing education, care pathways, patient education, patient empowerment, health care access, knowledge gaps, barriers to pain management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review