Cited by 9Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatment

Efficacy of quetiapine in patients with bipolar I and II depression: a multicenter, prospective, open-label, observational study

Open access
Jeong, Jong-Hyun, Bahk, Won-Myong, Woo, Seo, Hong, Jon, Min, Yoon·2013·Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the therapeutic efficacy of quetiapine in bipolar I and II depression patients in the clinical setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an 8-week, multicenter, open-label, observational study for bipolar depression. The dosage of quetiapine was flexible, and concomitant medications were permitted on clinician's judgments. A total of 1097 patients were enrolled, and 764 bipolar depression patients who exhibited good therapeutic compliance (>75% compliance rate) were analyzed. RESULTS: Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar scale and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores were significantly improved at weeks four and eight compared with the baseline scores. At the end of the 8-week study, the response rate was 58.9%, and the remission rate was 42.1%. However, there were no significant differences in the response and remission rates between bipolar I and II disorder (BD-I and BD-II) patients (response rate 60.1% versus 56.3%; remission rate 44.5% versus 37.0%). Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score at baseline (β = 0.612, P < 0.001), duration of current episode (β = -0.152, P = 0.001), and presence of remission on previous episode (β = 0.111, P = 0.012) were significantly associated with improvements in depressive symptoms. Fatigue (16.0%), somnolence (14.9%), and manic/hypomanic switching (0.6% at week four, 0.3% at week eight) were observed throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that quetiapine improves depressive symptoms in BD-I and BD-II patients with a minimal incidence of manic switching. The therapeutic efficacy of quetiapine increased with time. Quetiapine could be an effective and safe modality for the treatment of BD-I and BD-II.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/ndt.s41081

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision: DSM-IV-TR® Washington, DC American Psychiatric Association 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeong, J.-H., Bahk, W.-M., Woo, Seo, Hong, Jon, Min, & Yoon
Affiliations
  • Catholic University of Korea (KR)
  • Hallym University (KR)
  • Chung-Ang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Bahk, Won-Myong
Venue
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Published
2013-02
Volume
9
Pages
197
ISSN
1176-6328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978587895
Cited by
9
References
26
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
quetiapine, bipolar depression, bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, atypical antipsychotics, antidepressant efficacy, fatigue, sleepiness, predictors of treatment response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review