Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current perspectives on attachment and bonding in the dog–human dyad

Payne, Elyssa, Bennett, Pauleen, McGreevy, Paul·2015·Psychology Research and Behavior Management

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/prbm.s74972

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stressful experiences may be buffered by the support of the human attachment figure and different attachment styles are also prevalent in dogs.

    “Moreover, stressful experiences may be buffered by the support of the human attachment figure and different attachment styles are also prevalent in dogs [49].”

    From Therapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [49]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. [1]Thalmann O Shapiro B Cui P Complete mitochondrial genomes of ancient canids suggest a European origin of domestic dogs Science 2013 342 6160 871 874 24233726
  2. [2]Landsberg GM Hunthausen WL Ackerman LJ Handbook of Behavior Problems of the Dog and Cat 2nd ed Philadelphia, PA Elsevier Health Sciences 2003
  3. [7]Gácsi M Gyoöri B Virányi Z Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills PLoS One 2009 4 8 e6584 19714197 PMC2719091
  4. [8]Kirchhofer KC Zimmermann F Kaminski J Tomasello M Dogs (Canis familiaris), but not chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), understand imperative pointing PLoS One 2012 7 2 e30913 22347411 PMC3275610
  5. [10]Reid PJ Adapting to the human world: dogs’ responsiveness to our social cues Behav Processes 2009 80 3 325 333 19056474
  6. [12]Kaminski J Marshall-Pescini S The Social Dog: Behavior and Cognition Burlington, VT Elsevier Science 2014
  7. [13]Bowlby J The nature of the childs tie to his mother Int J Psychoanal 1958 39 5 350 373 13610508
  8. [16]Topál J Miklósi A Csányi V Dóka A Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) Strange Situation Test J Comp Psychol 1998 112 3 219 229 9770312
  9. [17]Gácsi M Maros K Sernkvist S Faragó T Miklósi A Human analogue safe haven effect of the owner: behavioural and heart rate response to stressful social stimuli in dogs PLoS One 2013 8 3 e58475 23469283 PMC3587610
  10. [18]Horn L Huber L Range F The importance of the secure base effect for domestic dogs – evidence from a manipulative problem-solving task PLoS One 2013 8 5 e65296 23734243 PMC3667003
  11. [19]Siniscalchi M Stipo C Quaranta A “Like owner, like dog”: correlation between the owner’s attachment profile and the owner-dog bond PLoS One 2013 8 10 e78455 24205235 PMC3813613
  12. [22]Horvath Z Doka A Miklosi A Affiliative and disciplinary behavior of human handlers during play with their dog affects cortisol concentrations in opposite directions Horm Behav 2008 54 1 107 114 18353328
  13. [23]McGreevy PD Boakes RA Carrots and Sticks: Principles of Animal Training Sydney, Australia Darlington Press 2007
  14. [24]Barker SB Wolen AR The benefits of human-companion animal interaction: a review J Vet Med Educ 2008 35 4 487 495 19228898
  15. [27]Anderson DC Assessing the Human-Animal Bond: A Compendium of Actual Measures West Lafayette, IN Purdue University Press 2007
  16. [29]Patronek GJ Glickman LT Beck AM McCabe GP Ecker C Risk factors for relinquishment of dogs to an animal shelter J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996 209 3 572 581 8755975
  17. [36]Kerswell KJ Butler KL Bennett P Hemsworth PH The relationships between morphological features and social signalling behaviours in juvenile dogs: the effect of early experience with dogs of different morphotypes Behav Processes 2010 85 1 1 7 20472041
  18. [39]Horowitz A Disambiguating the “guilty look”: Salient prompts to a familiar dog behaviour Behav Processes 2009 81 3 447 452 19520245
  19. [40]Starling MJ Branson NJ Cody D McGreevy PD Conceptualising the impact of arousal and affective state on training outcomes of operant conditioning Animals 2013 3 2 300 317 PMC4494394 26487403
  20. [41]Schwab C Huber L Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners J Comp Psychol 2006 120 3 169 175 16893253
  21. [43]Kwan JY Bain MJ Owner attachment and problem behaviors related to relinquishment and training techniques of dogs J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2013 16 2 168 183 23544756
  22. [46]Kotrschal K Schöberl I Bauer B Thibeaut AM Wedl M Dyadic relationships and operational performance of male and female owners and their male dogs Behav Processes 2009 81 3 383 391 19520238
  23. [51]de Bruijn GJ de Groot R van den Putte B Rhodes R Conscientiousness, extraversion, and action control: comparing moderate and vigorous physical activity J Sport Exerc Psychol 2009 31 6 724 742 20384009
  24. [54]Ákos Z Beck R Nagy M Vicsek T Kubinyi E Leadership and path characteristics during walks are linked to dominance order and individual traits in dogs PLoS Comput Biol 2014 10 1 e1003446 24465200 PMC3900374
  25. [58]Virányi Z1 Gácsi M Kubinyi E Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris) Anim Cogn 2008 11 3 373 387 18183437
  26. [59]Range F Virányi Z Wolves are better imitators of conspecifics than dogs PLoS One 2014 9 1 e86559 24489744 PMC3906065
  27. [60]Range F Virányi Z Social learning from humans or conspecifics: differences and similarities between wolves and dogs Front Psychol 2013 4 868 24363648 PMC3849518
  28. [63]Merola I Prato-Previde E Lazzaroni M Marshall-Pescini S Dogs’ comprehension of referential emotional expressions: familiar people and familiar emotions are easier Anim Cogn 2014 17 2 373 385 23955027
  29. [67]Johannson EE Human-Animal Bonding: An Investigation of Attributes [doctoral thesis] Edmonton, AB University of Alberta 1999
  30. [70]Bennett PC Cooper N Rohlf VI Mornement K Factors influencing owner satisfaction with companion-dog-training facilities J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2007 10 3 217 241 17645407
  31. [75]Gosling SD From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychol Bull 2001 127 1 45 86 11271756
  32. [78]Rehn T Handlin L Uvnäs-Moberg K Keeling LJ Dogs’ endocrine and behavioural responses at reunion are affected by how the human initiates contact Physiol Behav 2014 124 45 53 24471179
  33. [79]Shiverdecker MD Schiml PA Hennessy MB Human interaction moderates plasma cortisol and behavioral responses of dogs to shelter housing Physiol Behav 2013 109 75 79 23234768
  34. [80]Carter CS DeVries AC Taymans SE Roberts RL Williams JR Getz LL Peptides, Steroids, and Pair Bonding Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997 807 260 272 9071356

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Payne, E., Bennett, P., & McGreevy, P.
Venue
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Published
2015-02
Pages
71
ISSN
1179-1578
Cited by
239
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review