Cited by 46Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Equine Medical ResearchWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Management factors affecting adrenal glucocorticoid activity of tourist camp elephants in Thailand and implications for elephant welfare

Open access
Bansiddhi, Pakkanut, Brown, Janine L., Khonmee, Jaruwan, Norkaew, Treepradab, Nganvongpanit, Korakot, Punyapornwithaya, Veerasak, Angkawanish, Taweepoke, Somgird, Chaleamchat +1 more·2019·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Elephant camps are among the most popular destinations in Thailand for tourists from many countries. A wide range of management strategies are used by these camps, which can have varied impacts on health and welfare of elephants. The objectives of this study were to examine relationships between FGM (fecal glucocorticoid metabolite) concentrations and camp management factors (work routine, walking, restraint, rest area, foraging), and to other welfare indicators (stereotypic behaviors, body condition, foot health, and skin wounds). Data were obtained on 84 elephants (18 males and 66 females) from 15 elephant camps over a 1-year period. Elephants were examined every 3 months and assigned a body condition score, foot score, and wound score. Fecal samples were collected twice monthly for FGM analysis. Contrary to some beliefs, elephants in the observation only program where mahouts did not carry an ankus for protection had higher FGM concentrations compared to those at camps that offered riding with a saddle and shows. Elephants that were tethered in the forest at night had lower FGM concentrations compared to elephants that were kept in open areas inside the camps. There was an inverse relationship between FGM concentrations and occurrence of stereotypy, which was not anticipated. Thus, assessing adrenal activity via monitoring of FGM concentrations can provide important information on factors affecting the well-being of elephants. Results suggest that more naturalistic housing conditions and providing opportunities to exercise may be good for elephants under human care in Thailand, and that a no riding, no hook policy does not necessarily guarantee good welfare.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0221537

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of the ankus is a welfare concern among elephants used for tourism.

    “For example, Bansiddhi et al. (2019) reported that use of the ankus is a welfare concern among elephants used for tourism; half of the elephants studied had wounds, with most caused primarily by the ankus (e.g., abrasions, lacerations, abscesses) but also knives (e.g., penetrating and incision wounds), scratches, and pressure wounds”

    From Continuing challenges of elephant captivity: the captive environment, health issues, and welfare implications (2024) · cites this paper as Bansiddhi et al., 2019

    The Discussion reports wounds in 42 of 84 elephants, primarily attributed to the ankus, and describes the listed wound types, drawing some details from a larger study. It calls *misuse* of the ankus a welfare concern, whereas the citing sentence describes ankus use generally as a concern; the Discussion also reports no significant effect of ankus use on FGM concentrations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most wounds in the Bansiddhi et al. (2019) study were caused primarily by the ankus.

    “with most caused primarily by the ankus (e.g., abrasions, lacerations, abscesses) but also knives (e.g., penetrating and incision wounds), scratches, and pressure wounds”
  • Half of the elephants studied in Bansiddhi et al. (2019) had wounds.

    “half of the elephants studied had wounds, with most caused primarily by the ankus (e.g., abrasions, lacerations, abscesses) but also knives (e.g., penetrating and incision wounds), scratches, and pressure wounds”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [15]Wong EP, Campos-Arceiz A, Saaban S, Othman N, Solana-Mena A, Wadey J. The elephant who finally crossed the road–Significant life events reflected in faecal hormone metabolites of a wild Asian elephant. Gajah. 2018; 48: 4– 11.
  2. [58]Langbauer WR Jr. Elephant communication. Zoo Biol. 2000; 19(5): 425– 45.
  3. [63]Kurt F, Garai M, editors. Stereotypies in Captive Asian elephants—A symopsium of social isolation. The International Elephant and Rhino Research Symposium; 2001; Vienna.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bansiddhi, P., Brown, J. L., Khonmee, J., Norkaew, T., Nganvongpanit, K., Punyapornwithaya, V., Angkawanish, T., Somgird, C., & Thitaram, C.
Affiliations
  • Chiang Mai University (TH)
  • Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Thitaram, Chatchote
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2019-10-01
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
e0221537
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2979221504
Cited by
46
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Research Council of Thailand (170183)
  • Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. program, Thailand Research Fund (PHD/0187/2558)
  • Chiang Mai University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
captive elephants, elephant welfare, fecal glucocorticoid metabolites, stereotypy, tethering, physical activity, body condition, foot health, skin wounds, Mahout, Thailand
MeSH terms
Parks, Recreational, Adrenal Glands, Animals, Elephants, Feces, Female, Glucocorticoids, Male, Thailand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review