Cited by 293Technology Adoption and User BehaviourInnovative Human-Technology InteractionInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future Research

Open access
Chang, Andreas·2012·Journal The Winners

Abstract

This study reviews the most recent literature on UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology) and UTAUT 2(Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology) 2 by focusing on the findings and recommended future research. The papers, proceedings and dissertations included in the analysis were identified technology acceptance as the focus of their studies. This search was supplemented various websites which host scientific journals such as Emerald, Science Direct and Google Scholar. The initial search produced 65 papers. The studies examined works which employed UTAUT and UTAUT 2 by focusing on findings on the core constructs of UTAUT to predict Behavioral Intentions. The results confirmed previous studies that the four constructs of UTAUT contributed to Behavioral Intention even though PE seemed to be the most significant contributors. Findings also suggest UTAUT 2 has been more explanatory and list the suggestions for future works. The immediate implications are for researchers who wish to examine behavioral intentions, and managers who wish to ensure the acceptance and use of a new system or technology. This study bears a number of limitations. Number of papers examined is one of them. It would be more accurate to increase the number of paper examined. The other limitation is the ability to draw a statistical conclusion each research examined. This is due to a great variety of research topics, methods, constructs and contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21512/tw.v13i2.656

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. MA: Addison-Wesley.
  2. Wang, Y.S., Hung, Y.H., & Chou, S.C. T. (2006). Acceptance of E-Government Service: A Validation of the UTAUT. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on E-ACTIVITIES Venice, Italy.
  3. Williams, M., Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., & Lal, B. (2011). Is UTAUT Really Used or Just Cited f or The Sake o f It? A Systematic Review o f Citations of UTAUT's Originating Article. Paper presentedat the ECIS 2011 Proceedings, Paper 231.

Authors
Chang, A.
Affiliations
Binus University (ID)
Corresponding author
Chang, Andreas
Venue
Journal The Winners
Published
2012-09-28
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
10-114
ISSN
  • 1412-1212 (ISSN-L)
  • 2541-2388
OpenAlex
W1937598794
Cited by
293
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
  • The Winners (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • The Winner (Bina Nusantara University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
UTAUT, UTAUT2, technology acceptance, behavioral intention, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, continuance intention, technology acceptance model, future research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review