Cited by 209Technology Adoption and User BehaviourHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Investigating consumer intention to accept mobile payment systems through unified theory of acceptance model: An Indian perspective

Gupta, Kanishk, Arora, Nupur·2019·South Asian Journal of Business Studies

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of key antecedents of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model 2 on behavioral intention to accept and use mobile payment systems in National Capital Region, India. Design/methodology/approach: A sample of 267 mobile payment system users in National Capital Region was obtained through an online survey. A partial least squares method was used to find out whether key antecedents of UTAUT2 predict behavioral intention to accept mobile payment systems which further predicts use behavior toward mobile payment systems. Findings: The research substantiates that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, habit and facilitating conditions significantly predict behavioral intention, which in turn significantly predict use behavior to use mobile payment systems. Both social influence and hedonic motivation were weak predictors of behavioral intention. Research limitations/implications: The research substantiates that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, habit and facilitating conditions significantly predict behavioral intention, which in turn significantly predict use behavior to use mobile payment systems. Both social influence and hedonic motivation were weak predictors of behavioral intention. Originality/value: The research substantiates that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, habit and facilitating conditions significantly predict behavioral intention, which in turn significantly predict use behavior to use mobile payment systems. Both social influence and hedonic motivation were weak predictors of behavioral intention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/sajbs-03-2019-0037

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 145 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, K., & Arora, N.
Affiliations
Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies (IN)
Venue
South Asian Journal of Business Studies
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-11-29
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
88-114
ISSN
2398-628X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999713194
Cited by
208
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 5
FWCI
17.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
South Asian Journal of Business Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
mobile payment systems, behavioral intention, UTAUT2, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, habit, facilitating conditions, social influence, hedonic motivation, technology acceptance, use behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review