The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Strength Training on Sprint Running Performance: Current Findings and Implications for Training
Abstract
Today, it is generally accepted that sprint performance, like endurance performance, can improve considerably with training. Strength training, especially, plays a key role in this process. Sprint performance will be viewed multidimensionally as an initial acceleration phase (0 to 10 m), a phase of maximum running speed (36 to 100 m) and a transition phase in between. Immediately following the start action, the powerful extensions of the hip, knee and ankle joints are the main accelerators of body mass. However, the hamstrings, the m. adductor magnus and the m. gluteus maximus are considered to make the most important contribution in producing the highest levels of speed. Different training methods are proposed to improve the power output of these muscles. Some of them aim for hypertrophy and others for specific adaptations of the nervous system. This includes general (hypertrophy and neuronal activation), velocity specific (speed-strength) and movement specific (sprint associated exercises) strength training. In developing training strategies, the coach has to keep in mind that strength, power and speed are inherently related to one another, because they are all the output of the same functional systems. As heavy resistance training results in a fibre type IIb into fibre type IIa conversion, the coach has to aim for an optimal balance between sprint specific and nonspecific training components. To achieve this they must take into consideration the specific strength training demands of each individual, based on performance capacity in each specific phase of the sprint.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF CELL SIZE IN SPINAL MOTONEURONS
Henneman, E., Somjen, G., & Carpenter, D. O. (1965) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.560 · Cited by 2,294
Skeletal muscle adaptations during early phase of heavy-resistance training in men and women.
Staron, R. S., Karapondo, D. L., Kraemer, W. J., Fry, A. C., Gordon, S. E., Falkel, J. E., Hagerman, F. C., & Hikida, R. S. (1994) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1994.76.3.1247 · Cited by 796
Velocity Specificity of Resistance Training
Behm, D. G., & Sale, D. G. (1993) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-199315060-00003 · Cited by 460
Cited by
Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults
(2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181915670 · Cited by 4,332
Progression Models in Resistance Training for Healthy Adults
(2002) · Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200202000-00027 · Cited by 2,979
Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing
Sheppard, J. M., & Young, W. B. (2006) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410500457109 · Cited by 1,707
Repeated-Sprint Ability – Part I: Factors Contributing to Fatigue
Girard, O., Mendez-Villanueva, A., & Bishop, D. (2011) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/11590550-000000000-00000 · Cited by 916
Repeated-Sprint Ability – Part II: Recommendations for Training
Bishop, D., Girard, O., & Mendez-Villanueva, A. (2011) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/11590560-000000000-00000 · Cited by 621
Maximum Strength-Power-Performance Relationships in Collegiate Throwers
STONE, M. H., SANBORN, K., OʼBRYANT, H. S., HARTMAN, M., STONE, M. E., PROULX, C., WARD, B., & HRUBY, J. (2003) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/00124278-200311000-00019 · Cited by 254
Effect of training cessation on muscular performance: a meta-analysis
Bosquet, L., Berryman, N., Dupuy, O., Mekary, S., Arvisais, D., Bherer, L., & Mujika, I. (2013) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.12047 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Delecluse, C.
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 147-156
- ISSN
- 0112-1642
- OpenAlex
- W1987616163
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.