Cited by 176Skin Protection and AgingMedicinal Plant ResearchComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Botanicals in Dermatology

Reuter, Juliane, Merfort, Irmgard, Schempp, Christoph M.·2010·American Journal of Clinical Dermatology

Abstract

Botanical extracts and single compounds are increasingly used in cosmetics but also in over-the-counter drugs and food supplements. The focus of the present review is on controlled clinical trials with botanicals in the treatment of acne, inflammatory skin diseases, skin infections, UV-induced skin damage, skin cancer, alopecia, vitiligo, and wounds. Studies with botanical cosmetics and drugs are discussed, as well as studies with botanical food supplements. Experimental research on botanicals was considered to a limited extent when it seemed promising for clinical use in the near future. In acne therapy, Mahonia, tea tree oil, and Saccharomyces may have the potential to become standard treatments. Mahonia, Hypericum, Glycyrrhiza and some traditional Chinese medicines appear promising for atopic dermatitis. Some plant-derived substances like dithranol and methoxsalen (8-methoxypsoralen) [in combination with UVA] are already accepted as standard treatments in psoriasis; Mahonia and Capsicum (capsaicin) are the next candidates suggested by present evidence. Oral administration and topical application of antioxidant plant extracts (green and black tea, carotenoids, coffee, and many flavonoids from fruits and vegetables) can protect skin from UV-induced erythema, early aging, and irradiation-induced cancer. Hair loss and vitiligo are also traditional fields of application for botanicals. According to the number and quality of clinical trials with botanicals, the best evidence exi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/11533220-000000000-00000

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reuter, J., Merfort, I., & Schempp, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Schempp, Christoph M.
Venue
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
Published
2010-05
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
1
ISSN
1175-0561 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W22855108
Cited by
176
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 19
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
botanicals, herbal medicine, acne, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, vitiligo, hair loss, wound healing, skin cancer, UV-induced skin damage, antioxidants, tea tree oil, Mahonia, Hypericum, dithranol, 8-methoxypsoralen, phototherapy, photodermatitis, sensitization, traditional Chinese medicine, dietary supplements
MeSH terms
Animals, Cosmetics, Humans, Phytotherapy, Plant Extracts, Plants, Medicinal, Skin Diseases, Ultraviolet Rays, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review