Cited by 101Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Effects of Guanfacine Extended Release on Oppositional Symptoms in Children Aged 6–12 Years with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Oppositional Symptoms: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Connor, Daniel F., Findling, Robert L., Kollins, Scott H., Sallee, Floyd, López, Frank A., Lyne, Andrew, Tremblay, Gerald·2010·CNS Drugs

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of guanfacine extended release (XR, Intuniv; Shire Development Inc., Wayne, PA, USA) in the treatment of oppositional symptoms in children aged 6-12 years with a diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the presence of oppositional symptoms. Subjects and methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, flexible-dose, dose-optimization study, children aged 6-12 years were randomized to receive guanfacine XR (1-4 mg/day) or placebo for 9 weeks. Screening and washout periods were followed by a 5-week dose-optimization period, a 3-week dose-maintenance period and a 1-week tapering period. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to endpoint in the oppositional subscale of the Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised: Long Form (CPRS-R:L) score. Change in ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score was a secondary efficacy measure. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, ECG readings and laboratory studies. Results A total of 217 children were enrolled: 138 were randomized to receive guanfacine XR and 79 to receive placebo. Least-squares mean reductions from baseline to endpoint in CPRS-R:L oppositional subscale scores were 10.9 in the guanfacine XR group compared with 6.8 in the placebo group (p Conclusions In this population of children aged 6-12 years with ADHD and the presence of oppositional symptoms, significant reductions in CPRS-R:L oppositional…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/11537790-000000000-00000

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Connor, D. F., Findling, R. L., Kollins, S. H., Sallee, F., López, F. A., Lyne, A., & Tremblay, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Connor, Daniel F.
Venue
CNS Drugs
Published
2010-07
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1
ISSN
1172-7047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W107618943
Cited by
101
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CNS Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Shire
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
guanfacine extended release, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional behavior, children, ADHD medication, dose optimization, ADHD Rating Scale-IV, sleepiness, adverse events, treatment efficacy and safety
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Guanfacine, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review