Cited by 28Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesPharmaceutical studies and practices

Acute and long-term cardiovascular effects of stimulant, guanfacine, and combination therapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Sayer, Gregory R., McGough, James J., Levitt, Jennifer, Cowen, Jennifer, Sturm, Alexandra, Castelo, Edward, McCracken, James T.·2016·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examines cardiovascular (CV) effects of guanfacine immediate-release (GUAN-IR), dexmethylphenidate extended-release (DMPH), and their combination (COMB) during acute and long-term treatment of youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. METHODS: Two hundred seven participants aged 7-14 years enrolled in an 8-week double-blind randomized trial of GUAN-IR (1-3 milligrams (mg)/day), DMPH (5-20 mg/day), or COMB with fixed-flexible dosing and titrated to optimal behavioral response. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, and electrocardiograms were assessed at baseline, end of blinded optimization, and over a 1-year open-label maintenance phase. RESULTS: During acute titration, GUAN-IR decreased heart rate, systolic BP, and diastolic BP; DMPH increased heart rate, systolic BP, diastolic BP, and corrected QT (QTc) interval; COMB increased diastolic BP, but had no effects on heart rate, systolic BP, or QTc. During maintenance, GUAN-IR-associated decreases in heart rate and DMPH-associated increases in systolic BP returned to baseline values. Other variables across the three groups remained unchanged from the end of blinded titration. There were no discontinuations due to CV adverse events. CONCLUSION: GUAN-IR, DMPH, and COMB were well tolerated and safe. Expected changes in CV parameters during acute titration were seen in GUAN-IR and DMPH groups, with COMB values falling intermediately between the two other treatment groups. No serious CV events occurred in any participant. GUAN-IR- and DMPH-associated CV changes generally returned to baseline with sustained therapy. These data suggest that COMB treatment might attenuate long-term CV effects of GUAN-IR and stimulant monotherapy, possibly reducing risk of the small but statistically significant changes associated with either single treatment. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00429273.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cap.2015.0264

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Non-stimulants, particularly clonidine and guanfacine, are likely to have an opposite effect on ANS functioning, i.e., reducing HR and blood pressure, compared with stimulants, but they have similar benefits on cognitive performance and ADHD symptoms.

    “Non-stimulants, particularly clonidine and guanfacine, are likely to have an opposite effect on ANS functioning, i.e., reducing HR and blood pressure (see, for example, Sayer et al., 2016) compared with stimulants, but they have similar benefits on cognitive performance and ADHD symptoms.”

    From Is autonomic nervous system function atypical in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)? A systematic review of the evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Sayer et al., 2016

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., Text Revision. Washington (District of Columbia), American Psychiatric Association, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  2. Biederman J, Petty CR, Woodworth KY, Lomedico A, Hyder LL, Faraone SV: Adult outcomes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 73:941–950, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Connor DF, Findling RL, Kollins SH, Sallee F, Lopez FA, Lyne A, Tremblay G: Effects of guanfacine extended release on oppositional symptoms in children aged 6–12 years with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and oppositional symptoms. CNS Drugs 24:755–768, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Robertson J, Shilkofski N. (eds): Harriet Lane Handbook: A Manual for Pediatric House Officers: 17th Edition. Maryland Heights (Missouri), Mosby Press, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Stowe CD, Gardner SF, Gist CC, Schultz EG, Wells TG: 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in male children receiving stimulant therapy. Ann Pharmacother 36:1142–1149, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sayer, G. R., McGough, J. J., Levitt, J., Cowen, J., Sturm, A., Castelo, E., & McCracken, J. T.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2016-12
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
882-888
ISSN
  • 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8992
OpenAlex
W2509336638
Cited by
28
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, guanfacine, dexmethylphenidate, cardiovascular effects, heart rate, blood pressure, QTc interval, pediatric ADHD treatment, long-term maintenance therapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Blood Pressure, Child, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Time Factors, Guanfacine, Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists, Dexmethylphenidate Hydrochloride

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review