The role of social networks on the uptake of household water filters by women in self-help groups in rural India.
Abstract
Household water treatment and safe storage (HWTS) has been shown to improve drinking water quality and prevent disease. Efforts to scale up HWTS among vulnerable populations have been limited, partly due to an incomplete understanding of the socio-cultural influences on decision-making around uptake of HWTS. In-depth interviews were conducted with women in self-help groups in rural India who were exposed to a HWTS promotional campaign to investigate the influence of social networks on uptake of a household water filter. Results show discussion of the water filter amongst self-help group members, other peers, and family members allows social network members to share their opinions and purchasing intentions. This exposure is shown to shape individuals' opinions of the filter and establish purchasing norms within social networks. Within this cultural context, for high cost products like water filters, women needed to negotiate purchase with other household decision-makers. These results suggest that promoters of healthful durables like water filters must not only ensure product availability and financing, but also encourage platforms for discussion, recognize the socio-economic norms that develop around who adopts new technologies, and reach out to multiple actors in families and communities that influence individuals' behaviors and control household purchasing decisions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In India, social networks played an important role in women's decision to purchase new water filters.
“In India, social networks played an important role in women's decision to purchase new water filters [204]”
From Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [204]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Water, sanitation, and women’s empowerment: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis
Caruso, B. A., Conrad, A., Patrick, M., Owens, A., Kviten, K., Zarella, O., Rogers, H., & Sinharoy, S. S. (2022) · PLOS Water · doi:10.1371/journal.pwat.0000026 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Holvoet, N., Dewachter, S., & Molenaers, N. (2016) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-016-0760-9 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Trinies, V., Freeman, M. C., Hennink, M., & Clasen, T.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Emory University (US)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Freeman, Matthew C.
- Venue
- Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 224-232
- ISSN
- 2043-9083 (ISSN-L)
- 2408-9362
- OpenAlex
- W2004289230
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
- Keywords
- household water filters, social networks, women, self-help groups, technology adoption, household decision-making, social norms, purchase intention, peer influence, rural India, health campaigns, durable goods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review