Cited by 10Child Nutrition and Water AccessGender Studies and Social IssuesFecal contamination and water quality

A qualitative assessment of mothers' perceptions and behaviors in response to an intervention designed to encourage safe child feces management practices in rural Odisha, India

Open access
Williams, Rebekah N., Sclar, Gloria D., Routray, Parimita, Majorin, Fiona, Blais, Linelle, Caruso, Bethany A.·2022·Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development

Abstract

Abstract Child feces are not always safely disposed of into a latrine, potentially contributing to fecal exposure in the household environment. In India, safe disposal of child feces is a relatively uncommon practice despite gains in latrine coverage. This study took place after the delivery of a behavior change intervention that also included the provision of potties and scoops. The aims of this research were to (1) describe current child feces management (CFM) practices, (2) explore perceptions and behaviors of mothers who participated in intervention activities, and (3) assess the spillover of intervention activities in neighboring villages. Twenty-four in-depth interviews and four focus group discussions were conducted across six villages, three of which received the intervention. Using thematic analysis, we explored caregivers' descriptions of the different strategies to manage their child's feces. The study found (i) women's access to and perception of the intervention informed their knowledge, attitudes, perceived risk, and behaviors related to CFM, (ii) most women positively perceived the messages of the intervention with varying use of the tools provided for feces disposal, and (iii) there was no spillover in the neighboring villages. Our findings underscore that CFM practices must be addressed to reduce fecal contamination of the environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/washdev.2022.011

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women and girls might have increased exposures based on gendered expectations that they collect and treat water, manage dependents' faeces, and care for ill children.

    “Women and girls might have increased exposures based on gendered expectations that they collect and treat water, manage dependents’ faeces, and care for ill children.65, 66, 67”

    From Burden of disease attributable to unsafe drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene in domestic settings: a global analysis for selected adverse health outcomes (2023) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Family roles and responsibilities related to CFM section (page unavailable) identifies child-feces disposal as a responsibility of mothers and female caregivers; the Introduction links unsafe child-feces management to fecal-exposure risk. The paper does not establish the broader claim about women and girls collecting and treating water or caring for ill children, or show that these combined roles increase their exposure. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gil, A. I., Lanata, C. F., Kleinau, E. F. & Penny, M. E. 2004 Strategic Report 11 Children's Feces Disposal Practices in Developing Countries and Interventions to Prevent Diarrheal Diseases: A Literature Review. Environmental Health Project: Office of Health, Infectious Diseases and Nutrition Bureau for Global Health. Grandmother Project 2020 Available from: https://www.grandmotherproject.org (accessed 22 April 2022).
  2. Water and Sanitation Program, World Bank Group, United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) 2015 Management of Child Feces: Current Disposal Practices (Scaling Up Rural Sanitation and Hygiene). Water and Sanitation Program and World Bank Group. First received 16 January 2022; accepted in revised form 1 April 2022. Available online 19 April 2022 Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development Vol 12 No 4, 386

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, R. N., Sclar, G. D., Routray, P., Majorin, F., Blais, L., & Caruso, B. A.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Rebekah N.
Venue
Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
Published
2022-04-01
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
375-386
ISSN
  • 2043-9083 (ISSN-L)
  • 2408-9362
OpenAlex
W4224277624
Cited by
10
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1148651)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
Keywords
latrine use, behaviour change interventions, maternal perceptions, spillover effects, fecal contamination, rural Odisha, household hygiene

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review