Cited by 17Water Resource Management and QualityGender, Education, and Development IssuesGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Impacts of domestic water supply on gender and income: Results from a participatory study in a drought-prone region in Gujarat, India.

Sijbesma, Christine, Verhagen, Joep, Nanavaty, Reema, James, A. J.·2009·Water Policy

Abstract

In this paper the value of an improved domestic water supply was investigated for economic development and gender relations in rural households in a drought-prone area. A comparative study executed with participatory rural appraisal (PRA) methods with groups of women from 11 micro-enterprises in ten villages and five control villages showed that,when an improved domestic water supply does not function, the entrepreneurs groups have a statistically higher loss of the economic use of water and time than the control groups. The extra income that women gain when the supply works and is used economically helps poor families to bridge the dry season. It could further be quantitatively proven that male–female gender relations were significantly better in the entrepreneurs group. This was not so for mother–daughter relationships, which gave new insights into the need to address gender equality issues with the women themselves and with SEWA, the supporting agency. These findings support the view that rural poverty and the status of women would receive a significant boost if policy makers focused on providing employment opportunities for women along with improved water supplies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wp.2009.011

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sijbesma, C., Verhagen, J., Nanavaty, R., & James, A. J.
Affiliations
  • IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre (NL)
  • Self-Employed Women's Association, Opposite Victoria Garden, Bhadra, Ahmedabad, 380 001, India
  • PRAGMATIX, 520 Galleria, DLF City Phase IV, Gurgaon, Haryana 122002, India
Corresponding author
Sijbesma, Christine
Venue
Water Policy
Published
2009-02-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
95-105
ISSN
  • 1366-7017 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-9759
OpenAlex
W2047324487
Cited by
17
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Water Policy (publishedVersion)
Funders
Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
domestic water supply, gender relations, women's income, rural poverty, drought-prone areas, time use, mother-daughter relationships, SEWA, participatory rural appraisal, Gujarat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review