CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Environmental Impact and SustainabilityWater-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesWater resources management and optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Water footprint assessment and its importance in Indian context: a meta-review

Open access
Mehla, Mukesh Kumar, Kothari, Mahesh, Singh, Pardeep Kumar, Bhakar, Sita Ram, Yadav, Kamal Kishore·2023·Water Supply
DOI 10.2166/ws.2023.174
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

With the increasing population and per capita demand for freshwater, the burden of natural resources has increased many folds. Indian agriculture is still largely dependent on conventional methods of crop production that are mainly inefficient. Water security is essential for social and economic development, having an indispensable role in enhancing health, well-being, and economic progress, particularly in a developing country like India. Water footprint (WF) is an important indicator that helps ascertain the direct and indirect use of water in any process. WF modeling in agriculture enables us to pinpoint the impacts and limitations of the current crop production system. Assessing vulnerabilities across various regions and time helps us prepare actions to improve water productivity and promote sustainable water use. There is considerable spatial variability in blue, green, and gray WF among the different states of India due to their varied climate, soil, and topographic characteristics. WF assessment is critical for developing water allocation strategies, planning water trade, making policies, and implementing remedial measures. This paper describes the significance of WF and its proper management for sustainable crop production in India.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/ws.2023.174

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. 10.1007/s11269-009-9480-8 · DOI
  2. 10.3390/su15065325 · DOI
  3. Briscoe, 2005, India's Water Economy: Bracing for A Turbulent Future
  4. 10.1080/02508060208686989 · DOI
  5. CGWB, 2014, Dynamic Groundwater Resources of India. Technical Report
  6. Chapagain, 2004, Water Footprints of Nations. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 16
  7. 10.1080/02508060801927812 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.06.006 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156906 · DOI
  10. 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.020105.100323 · DOI
  11. Chukalla, 2017, Green, Blue, and Grey Water Footprint Reduction in Irrigated Crop Production
  12. 10.5194/hess-19-4877-2015 · DOI
  13. 10.5194/hess-22-3245-2018 · DOI
  14. 10.2166/wp.2014.165 · DOI
  15. Dhawan V. 2017 Water and Agriculture in India. Background Paper for the South Asia Expert Panel during the Global Forum for Food and Agriculture, 28, pp. 80–85.
  16. 10.5194/hess-15-1641-2011 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106962 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.11.015 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s11269-006-9048-9 · DOI
  20. Garrido, 2010, Water Footprint and Virtual Water Trade in Spain: Policy Implications, 10.1007/978-1-4419-5741-2 · DOI
  21. 10.5194/hess-12-1007-2008 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.085 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/wat2.1000 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s11269-017-1618-5 · DOI
  25. Hoekstra, 2008, Globalisation of Water: Sharing the Planet's Freshwater Resources
  26. 10.1073/pnas.1109936109 · DOI
  27. Hoekstra, 2011, The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard
  28. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032688 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/clen.201400765 · DOI
  30. 10.3390/w7126674 · DOI
  31. 10.18520/cs/v117/i4/569-576 · DOI
  32. 10.5958/2455-7145.2019.00050.X · DOI
  33. Kampman, 2007, The Water Footprint of India: A Study on Water Use in Relation to the Consumption of Agricultural Goods in the Indian States
  34. Kampman, 2008, The Water Footprint of India. Value of Water Research Report Serie No. 32
  35. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124881 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102959 · DOI
  37. Kathpalia, 2002, Water policy and action plan for India 2020: an alternative, Alternative Future, 1, 1
  38. 10.2166/wp.2015.086 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.304 · DOI
  40. Liu, 2009, Global consumptive water uses for crop production: the importance of green water and virtual water, Water Resources Research, 45, W05428, 10.1029/2007WR006051 · DOI
  41. Lorite, 2015, Reference Manual AquaCrop-GIS Version 2.1
  42. Mali, 2019, Assessment of water footprints in Betwa River basin under limited data availability, Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 56, 122
  43. 10.1038/s41598-021-88223-6 · DOI
  44. 10.7717/peerj.14207 · DOI
  45. 10.31018/jans.v14i4.3896 · DOI
  46. 10.53550/EEC.2023.v29i01.018 · DOI
  47. 10.5194/hess-14-1259-2010 · DOI
  48. 10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011 · DOI
  49. Mekonnen, 2011b, National Water Footprint Accounts: The Green, Blue and Grey Water Footprint of Production and Consumption, Value of Water Research Report Series No. 50
  50. Mekonnen, 2013, Water Footprint Benchmarks for Crop Production, Value of Water Research, Report Series No. 64
  51. 10.1126/sciadv.1500323 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Miguel A., Kallache M. & García-Calvo E. 2012 CWUModel: a water balance model to estimate the water footprint in the Duero River Basin. In Proceedings of the Session ‘Solving the Water Crisis: Common Action Toward a Sustainable Water Footprint’-Planet Under Pressure Conference London 26: 39–58.
  53. 10.1016/j.pedsph.2022.06.045 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.311 · DOI
  55. 10.1007/s10705-009-9292-5 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/ird.323 · DOI
  57. PIB, 2020, Per Capita Availability of Water
  58. Raes, 2011, Reference Manual AquaCrop Version 4.0
  59. 10.1029/2007WR006331 · DOI
  60. Saha, 2019, Groundwater resources of India: potential, challenges and management, 19, 10.1007/978-3-319-75115-3_2 · DOI
  61. 10.1007/s40899-021-00549-1 · DOI
  62. Shrestha, 2021, National water mission (India) templates revisited, Journal of Indian Water Resources Society, 41, 1
  63. Sidhu, 2021, The water footprint of crop production: a review, Indian Journal of Ecology, 48, 358
  64. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.031 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.7717/peerj.14815 · DOI
  66. 10.2134/agronj2008.0139s · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.21523/gcj5.17010102 · DOI
  68. Suhail, 2020, Assessment of water footprint under wheat cultivation in Uttar Pradesh, 30, 10.4324/9781003141020-4 · DOI
  69. Tewatia, 2017, Trends in fertilizer nitrogen production and consumption in India, 45, 10.1016/B978-0-12-811836-8.00004-5 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.09.001 · DOI
  71. UNEP, 2011, Water Footprint and Corporate Water Accounting for Resource Efficiency
  72. UNFPA, 2023, State of World Population Report
  73. 10.1016/j.wri.2013.03.002 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.pce.2008.05.002 · DOI
  75. 10.1038/d41586-019-02600-w · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mehla, M. K., Kothari, M., Singh, P. K., Bhakar, S. R., & Yadav, K. K.
Affiliations
Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Mehla, Mukesh Kumar
ORCID
Venue
Water Supply
Publisher
IWA Publishing
Published
2023-07-17
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
3113-3127
ISSN
  • 1606-9749 (ISSN-L)
  • 1607-0798
DOI
10.2166/ws.2023.174
OpenAlex
W4384523735
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Water Science & Technology Water Supply (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water resources management and optimization
Keywords
water footprint, blue water footprint, green water footprint, grey water footprint, agricultural water use, water security, water productivity, sustainable crop production, water allocation, water markets, spatial variability, India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review