Cited by 874Irrigation Practices and Water ManagementEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityWater resources management and optimization

Quantifying blue and green virtual water contents in global crop production as well as potential production losses without irrigation

Siebert, Stefan, Döll, Petra·2010·Journal of Hydrology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.031

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siebert, S., & Döll, P.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Siebert, Stefan
Venue
Journal of Hydrology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
384
Issue
3-4
Pages
198-217
ISSN
0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156382101
Cited by
874
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 37
FWCI
36.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Hydrology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
Keywords
virtual water, blue water, green water, evapotranspiration, crop water use, irrigation, rainfed agriculture, crop yield, soil water balance, crop yield loss, cereals, rice, wheat, maize, global crop production, water scarcity, multiple cropping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review