Cited by 71Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluoride Effects and Removal

Perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctane sulfonate in South African river water

Mudumbi, J. B. N., Ntwampe, S. K. O., Muganza, F. M., Okonkwo, J. O.·2014·Water Science and Technology

Abstract

This study examined the prevalence of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in river water samples (n = 56) and suspended solids (n = 5) from three major Western Cape rivers, in South Africa. Solid phase extraction (SPE) followed by liquid chromatography combined with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using an analytical method developed in ISO 25101 (2009), PFOS and PFOA concentration in river water and in suspended solids from the rivers was investigated and quantified. From the results, PFOA and PFOS were detected in all the river water samples and were found in concentrations up to 314 and 182 ng/L for Diep River; 390 and 47 ng/L for Salt River; and 146 and 23 ng/L for Eerste River, respectively. In suspended solids, concentrations for PFOS and PFOA were 28 and 26 ng/g for Diep River; 16 and less than limit of detection for Eerste River; and 14 and 5 ng/g for Salt River, respectively. Some of these concentrations are higher than those previously reported in similar studies in various countries, and this suggests there is a cause for concern, in the Western Cape, South Africa, particularly in catchments where river and ground water is drawn for agricultural purposes in the province.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wst.2013.566

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mudumbi, J. B. N., Ntwampe, S. K. O., Muganza, F. M., & Okonkwo, J. O.
Affiliations
  • Cape Peninsula University of Technology (ZA)
  • Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
Corresponding author
Mudumbi, J. B. N.
Venue
Water Science and Technology
Published
2013-10-17
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
185-194
ISSN
  • 0273-1223 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-9732
OpenAlex
W2334063836
Cited by
71
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
Keywords
perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, perfluorinated compounds, river pollution, suspended solids, Salt River, agricultural groundwater use
MeSH terms
Caprylates, Chromatography, Liquid, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, South Africa, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Rivers, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review