Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Degradation and toxicity depletion of RB19 anthraquinone dye in water by ozone-based technologies

Lovato, María E., Fiasconaro, María L., Martín, Carlos A.·2017·Water Science and Technology

Abstract

This research investigated the discoloration and mineralization of Reactive Blue 19 (RB19) anthraquinone dye by single ozonation, single UV radiation and ozonation jointed with UV radiation (O3/UV). The problem was approached from two points of view: with the objective of color removal or the mineralization of solution. In each case, the optimum operating conditions were different. Ozonation was the most effective treatment for color removal, while the combined O3/UV treatment was for mineralization. Major intermediates of the dye degradation were identified by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and a degradation pathway was proposed. In addition, a clear decrease of the toxicity of the dye was achieved at the end of the experiments. The effect of initial dye concentration, pH, ozone dose, and UV radiation on the degradation of the dye and decrease of total organic carbon was investigated, in order to establish the optimal operating conditions to achieve discoloration, mineralization or a combination of both.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wst.2016.501

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on Reactive Blue 19 using same starting concentration (100 mg/mL) but different combination of AOP showed highly different results.

    “Studies on Reactive Blue 19 conducted by different groups, using the same starting concentration (100 mg/mL) but different combination of AOP, showed highly different results.”

    From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [68]

    The introduction reports large discrepancies among RB19 studies by different groups, and the section on UV radiation reports different outcomes for UV, ozone, and UV/ozone treatments. But the paper does not establish that those groups used the same starting concentration of 100 mg/mL; its own treatment comparison used approximately 230 mg/L. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using combination of methods such as Fenton reaction coupled with adsorption on pyrite ash, or ozonation coupled with UV radiation can be much more efficient compared to ozonation only.

    “It was shown that using a combination of methods such as Fenton reaction coupled with adsorption on pyrite ash 67 , or ozonation coupled with UV radiation 68 can be much more efficient compared to ozonation only 69 , based on the .”
  • Identified fragments for ozonation of Reactive Blue 19 ranged from a mixture of phenol, acetic acid and propandioic acid, to a mixture of phenol, acetic acid and oxalic acid, and to a mixture of phthalic acid and unspecified carboxylic acids.

    “Identified fragments ranged from a mixture of phenol, acetic acid and propandioic acid 68 , to a mixture of phenol, acetic acid and oxalic acid 92 and to a mixture of phthalic acid and unspecified carboxylic acids 69 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Beltrán, 2003, Ozone Reaction Kinetics for Water and Wastewater Systems, 10.1201/9780203509173 · DOI
  2. Chang, 2009, Comparative study on the degradation of I.C. Remazol Brilliant Blue R and I.C. Acid Black 1 by Fenton oxidation and Fe 0/air process and toxicity evaluation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 166, 1279, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.042 · DOI
  3. Chen, 2009, Application of ozone on the decolorization of reactive dyes — Orange-13 and Blue-19, Desalination, 249, 1238, 10.1016/j.desal.2008.10.032 · DOI
  4. Cortez, 2010, Ozonation as polishing treatment of mature landfill leachate, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 182, 730, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.095 · DOI
  5. Deng, 2008, Decolorization of anthraquinone, triphenylmethane and azo dyes by a new isolated Bacillus cereus strain DC11, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 62, 263, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2008.01.017 · DOI
  6. Fanchiang, 2009, Degradation of anthraquinone dye C.I. Reactive Blue 19 in aqueous solution by ozonation, . Chemosphere, 77, 214, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.038 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Franca, 2015, Effect of an azo dye on the performance of an aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactor treating a simulated textile wastewater, Water Research, 85, 327, 10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.043 · DOI
  8. Gilliard, 2013, Reaction kinetic model for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid decomposition in aqueous media including direct photolysis, direct ozonation, ultraviolet C, and pH enhancement, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52, 14034, 10.1021/ie400957m · DOI
  9. Guimarães, 2012, A comparative study on the degradation of RB-19 dye in an aqueous medium by advanced oxidation processes, Journal of Environmental Management, 110, 33, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.020 · DOI
  10. He, 2008, Mineralization of C.I. Reactive Blue 19 by ozonation combined with sonolysis: performance optimization and degradation mechanism, Separation and Purification Technology, 62, 376, 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Khandegar, 2013, Electrocoagulation for the treatment of textile industry effluent – a review, Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 49, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.043 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kusic, 2011, Photooxidation processes for an azo dye in aqueous media: modeling of degradation kinetic and ecological parameters evaluation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 185, 1558, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.087 · DOI
  13. Liu, 2004, Evaluation of selected operational parameters for the decolorization of dye-finishing wastewater using UV/ozone, Ozone: Science & Engineering, 26, 239, 10.1080/01919510490455557 · DOI
  14. Lovato, 2009, A reaction kinetic model for ozone decomposition in aqueous media valid for neutral and acidic pH, Chemical Engineering Journal, 146, 486, 10.1016/j.cej.2008.11.001 · DOI
  15. Lovato, 2015, Kinetics of the degradation of n-butyl benzyl phthalate using O3/UV, direct photolysis, direct ozonation and UV effects, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 909, 10.1007/s11356-014-2796-9 · DOI
  16. Novotny, 2006, Comparative use of bacterial, algal and protozoan tests to study toxicity of azo- and anthraquinone dyes, Chemosphere, 63, 1436, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Patil, 2015, Decolorization of reactive blue 171 dye using ozonation and UV/H2O2 and elucidation of the degradation mechanism, Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 34, 1652, 10.1002/ep.12171 · DOI
  18. Pirgalioglu, 2009, Comparison of non-catalytic and catalytic ozonation processes of three different aqueous single dye solutions with respect to powder copper sulfide catalyst, Applied Catalysis A: General, 363, 157, 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.05.011 · DOI
  19. Polat, 2015, Catalytic ozonation of an industrial textile wastewater in a heterogeneous continuous reactor, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3, 1860, 10.1016/j.jece.2015.04.020 · DOI
  20. Rondon, 2015, Application of enhanced membrane bioreactor (eMBR) to treat dye wastewater, Bioresource Technology, 183, 78, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.110 · DOI
  21. Sevimli, 2002, Ozone treatment of textile effluents and dyes: effect of applied ozone dose, pH and dye concentration, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 77, 842, 10.1002/jctb.644 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Siddique, 2011, Enhanced decomposition of reactive blue 19 dye in ultrasound assisted electrochemical reactor, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 18, 190, 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.05.004 · DOI
  23. Soares, 2000, Ozonation of textile effluents and dye solutions under continuous operation: influence of operating parameters, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 137, 1664, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.006 · DOI
  24. Tehrani-Bagha, 2010, Degradation of a persistent organic dye from colored textile wastewater by ozonation, Desalination, 260, 34, 10.1016/j.desal.2010.05.004 · DOI
  25. Venkatesh, 2015, Impact of ozonation on decolorization and mineralization of azo dyes: biodegradability enhancement, by-products formation, required energy and cost, Ozone: Science & Engineering, 37, 420, 10.1080/01919512.2015.1027810 · DOI
  26. Vinu, 2010, Investigation of dye functional group on the photocatalytic degradation of dyes by nano-TiO2, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 176, 765, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.101 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lovato, M. E., Fiasconaro, M. L., & Martín, C. A.
Venue
Water Science and Technology
Published
2016-12-05
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
813-822
ISSN
  • 0273-1223
  • 1996-9732
Cited by
29
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review