Effect of temperature and duration of pyrolysis on spent tea leaves biochar: physiochemical properties and Cd(II) adsorption capacity
Open accessAbstract
We analyzed the effects of pyrolysis temperature and duration on the physiochemical properties and Cd(II) adsorption capacity of spent tea leaves (STL) biochar. The STL biochar was produced by pyrolysis at 300, 400, 500 and 600 °C for 1 and 2 h. The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (SBET), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios. Furthermore, the surface porosity of STL biochar increased, the density of oxygen-containing functional groups decreased, and the formation of aromatic structures was enhanced at higher pyrolysis temperatures. The adsorption of Cd(II) onto STL biochar fitted with the pseudo-second-order kinetics and Langmuir isotherms model. The STL biochar produced at 600 °C for 2 h showed the maximum Cd(II) adsorption capacity of 97.415 mg/g. In addition, Cd(II) adsorption was mainly physical and occurred in monolayers. Thus, STL biochar is a suitable low-cost adsorbent for wastewater treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 3 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The density of oxygen-containing functional groups on STL biochar decreased with increasing pyrolysis temperature.
“Furthermore, the surface porosity of STL biochar increased, the density of oxygencontaining functional groups decreased, and the formation of aromatic structures was enhanced at higher pyrolysis temperatures.”
- Also stated in: § Characterization of surface functional groups · plain
“As shown in Figure 6, the density of the oxygen-containing functional groups, such as hydroxyl (-OH), carboxyl (-COOH) and phenols (C-OH), decreased with increasing temperature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Characterization of surface functional groups · plain
- Findingown data
The adsorption of Cd(II) onto STL biochar fitted the pseudo-second-order kinetics model.
“The adsorption of Cd(II) onto STL biochar fitted with the pseudosecond-order kinetics and Langmuir isotherms model.”
- Also stated in: § Adsorption kinetics · plain
“According to the R 2 values, the pseudo second-order rather than first-order kinetic model was representative of the Cd(II) sorption kinetics on STL biochars (Table 3).”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
“Biochar produced at 600 C for 2 hours adsorbed the largest amount of Cd(II), and the sorption kinetics closely followed the pseudo-second-order model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Adsorption kinetics · plain
- Findingown data
The surface porosity of STL biochar increased at higher pyrolysis temperatures.
“Furthermore, the surface porosity of STL biochar increased, the density of oxygencontaining functional groups decreased, and the formation of aromatic structures was enhanced at higher pyrolysis temperatures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The relationship between ash content and pH of STL biochar followed an exponential trend (Adj.R2 = 0.936).
“As shown in Figure 2, the relationship between ash content and pH of STL biochar followed an exponential trend (Adj.R 2 ¼ 0.936).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The interaction between pyrolysis temperature and duration did not have a statistically significant effect on the yield, ash content, pH, EC, or CEC of STL biochar.
“Temperature × duration | | 1.569 | 0.561 | 3.679 | 0.037 | 0.798”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Cd(II) adsorption on STL biochar was rapid within the first 8 h.
“As shown in Figure 8(a) and 8(b), Cd(II) adsorption on the STL biochar was rapid within the first 8 h, likely due to the availability of adsorption sites and stronger attachment to the outer surfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The most rapid decline in STL biochar yield occurred between 300 and 400 C, with a 15.4% loss of the initial feedstock mass.
“Interestingly, the most rapid decline occurred between 300 and 400 C, with a 15.4% loss of the initial feedstock mass (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The C/N atomic ratio of STL biochar increased from 28.58 to 106.28 at higher temperatures.
“The C/N atomic ratio, representative of the mobilization and exchange of inorganic N, increased from 28.58 to 106.28 at higher temperatures, indicating removal of labile matter and ignition loss of N during pyrolysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
STL biochar produced at 600 C for 2 h showed the maximum Cd(II) adsorption capacity of 97.415 mg/g.
“The STL biochar produced at 600 C for 2 h showed the maximum Cd(II) adsorption capacity of 97.415 mg/g.”
- Also stated in: § Adsorption isotherm · plain
“According to the saturation threshold of the best matching model, the STL biochar produced at 600 C for 2 h showed the maximum Cd(II) adsorption capacity of 97.415 mg/g, which was 1.38-1.63,1.07-1.26and 1.01-1.14times greater than that of biochar samples produced at 300, 400 and 500 C respectively.”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
“The Langmuir isotherm model fitted well with the experimental data, and the maximum adsorption capacity for Cd(II) was 97.415 mg/g.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Adsorption isotherm · plain
- Findingown data
The relationship between pyrolysis temperature and STL biochar yield followed an exponential curve (Adj.R2 = 0.985).
“The relationship between pyrolysis temperature and yield followed an exponential curve (Figure 1(a); Adj.R 2 ¼ 0.985).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The duration of pyrolysis had a negligible effect on S_BET of STL biochar.
“The duration of pyrolysis had a negligible effect on S BET .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cd(II) uptake by STL biochar varied across the pH range of 2-7 regardless of pyrolysis temperature.
“Cd(II) uptake by the STL biochar varied across the pH range of 2-7 regardless of the pyrolysis temperature (Figure 7(a), 7(b)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The highest ash content was obtained following pyrolysis at 600 C for 2 h (17.89%).
“The highest ash content was obtained following pyrolysis at 600 C for 2 h (17.89%;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The O/C and H/C atomic ratios of STL biochar ranged from 0.19-0.39 and 0.02-0.06 respectively.
“The O/C and H/C atomic ratios are indicative of the degree of aromaticity and polarity of biochar, and ranged from 0.19-0.39 and 0.02-0.06respectively (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The q_e,cal values calculated from the pseudo-second-order kinetic model were closer to the experimental data.
“The q e, cal values calculated from the pseudo-second-order kinetic model were closer to the experimental data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
More adherent particles were observed on the surface of STL biochar at a higher temperature.
“In addition, more adherent particles were observed on the surface of STL biochar at a higher temperature (Figure 5(c), 5(d), 5(g), 5(h)), which can be attributed to an increase in crystallization of mineral components.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The adsorption of Cd(II) onto STL biochar fitted the Langmuir isotherm model.
“The adsorption of Cd(II) onto STL biochar fitted with the pseudosecond-order kinetics and Langmuir isotherms model.”
- Also stated in: § Adsorption isotherm · hedged
“The R 2 values obtained from the Langmuir isotherm model were higher than that from the Freundlich isotherm model, indicating that the equilibrium kinetics followed the former (Table 4).”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · boosted
“The Langmuir isotherm model fitted well with the experimental data, and the maximum adsorption capacity for Cd(II) was 97.415 mg/g.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Adsorption isotherm · hedged
- Interpretationreasoning
The temperature-dependent increase in pH of STL biochar can be attributed to the loss of acidic surface functional groups.
“The temperaturedependent increase in pH can also be attributed to the loss of acidic surface functional groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The rapid initial Cd(II) adsorption is likely due to the availability of adsorption sites and stronger attachment to the outer surfaces.
“As shown in Figure 8(a) and 8(b), Cd(II) adsorption on the STL biochar was rapid within the first 8 h, likely due to the availability of adsorption sites and stronger attachment to the outer surfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The higher Cd(II) adsorption capacity of STL biochar produced at higher temperatures may be attributed to the higher specific surface area and pore volume resulting from pyrolysis at higher temperatures.
“This may be attributed to the higher specific surface area and pore volume resulting from pyrolysis at higher temperatures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Cd(II) adsorption on STL biochar mainly occurred in monolayers.
“In addition, Cd(II) adsorption was mainly physical and occurred in monolayers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Günay et al. 2007 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The increase in adherent particles on STL biochar surface at higher temperature can be attributed to an increase in crystallization of mineral components.
“In addition, more adherent particles were observed on the surface of STL biochar at a higher temperature (Figure 5(c), 5(d), 5(g), 5(h)), which can be attributed to an increase in crystallization of mineral components.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The temperature-dependent elevation in S_BET of STL biochar can be attributed to an increase in biochar porosity with heating.
“This temperaturedependent elevation in S BET can be attributed to an increase in biochar porosity with heating.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The increase in C/N ratio indicates removal of labile matter and ignition loss of N during pyrolysis.
“The C/N atomic ratio, representative of the mobilization and exchange of inorganic N, increased from 28.58 to 106.28 at higher temperatures, indicating removal of labile matter and ignition loss of N during pyrolysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The lower O/C and H/C ratios at 600 C compared to 300 C can be attributed to greater dehydration and decarboxylation at high temperatures.
“In addition, the O/C and H/C ratios were respectively 52.25% and 62.24% lower in the biochar produced at 600 C compared to that at 300 C, which can be attributed to a greater degree of dehydration and decarboxylation at high temperatures (Ahmad et al.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The formation of aromatic structures in STL biochar was enhanced at higher pyrolysis temperatures.
“Furthermore, the surface porosity of STL biochar increased, the density of oxygencontaining functional groups decreased, and the formation of aromatic structures was enhanced at higher pyrolysis temperatures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The decrease in -COOH, C-OH and -OH peaks is indicative of the cleavage of acidic groups.
“The decrease in -COOH, C-OH and -OH peaks is indicative of the cleavage of acidic groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- The quote only partly states this claim. 8
- May combine two claims. 28
The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningCd(II) adsorption increased as the solution temperature increased from 20 to 40 C.
“The results indicated that Cd(II) adsorption increased as the temperature increased.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe adsorption rates increased significantly at Cd(II) concentration below 60 mg/L, and decreased thereafter.
“As shown in Figure 8(c) and 8(d), the adsorption rates increased significantly at Cd(II) concentration below 60 mg/L, and decreased thereafter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningPyrolysis temperature is positively correlated with the specific surface area (S_BET) of STL biochar; S_BET was extremely low below 500 C (1.64-8.75 m2/g) and increased to 62.52-67.10 m2/g at 600 C.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Surface characteristics and micro morphology · plain
“The S BET of STL biochar pyrolyzed at temperatures below 500 C were extremely low (1.64-8.75m 2 /g), and increased to 62.52-67.10m 2 /g at 600 C (Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Surface characteristics and micro morphology · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyrolysis temperature is negatively correlated with the H content of STL biochar; H content decreased from 3.71 to 1.78% as temperature increased from 300 to 600 C.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
“The average C content increased from 64.26 to 81.44%, while that of H, O and N respectively decreased from 3.71 to 1.78%, 23.76 to 14.43% and 2.29 to 0.78% as the pyrolysis temperature was increased from 300 to 600 C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningPyrolysis temperature is negatively correlated with the H/C atomic ratio of STL biochar; the H/C ratio was 62.24% lower in biochar produced at 600 C compared to 300 C.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
“In addition, the O/C and H/C ratios were respectively 52.25% and 62.24% lower in the biochar produced at 600 C compared to that at 300 C, which can be attributed to a greater degree of dehydration and decarboxylation at high temperatures (Ahmad et al.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSTL biochar produced at 600 C for 2 h reached the adsorption equilibrium faster and adsorbed the largest amount of Cd(II) compared to other biochar samples.
“The STL biochar produced at 600 C for 2 h reached the adsorption equilibrium faster and adsorbed the largest amount of Cd(II) compared to other biochar samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyrolysis temperature is positively correlated with the pH of STL biochar; average pH increased from 5.75 at 300 C to 7.2, 7.38 and 7.44 at 400, 500 and 600 C respectively.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
“The average pH of STL biochar increased from 5.75 at 300 C to 7.2, 7.38 and 7.44 at 400, 500 and 600 C respectively (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataPyrolysis temperature is positively correlated with the pore volume (PV) of STL biochar; PV was maximum (0.0301 cm3/g) in STL biochar produced at 600 C for 2 h.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Surface characteristics and micro morphology · plain
“Likewise, PV value was maximum (0.0301 cm 3 /g) in the STL biochar produced at 600 C for 2 h (Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Surface characteristics and micro morphology · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyrolysis temperature is positively correlated with the electrical conductivity (EC) of STL biochar; EC increased at higher temperatures and was maximum in samples pyrolyzed at 600 C for 2 h.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
“the electrical conductivity (EC), which reflects the total amount of dissolved salts in biochar, also increased at higher temperatures (Table 1; P < 0.01) and was maximum in samples pyrolyzed at 600 C for 2 h.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyrolysis temperature is positively correlated with the C content of STL biochar; average C content increased from 64.26 to 81.44% as temperature increased from 300 to 600 C.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
“The average C content increased from 64.26 to 81.44%, while that of H, O and N respectively decreased from 3.71 to 1.78%, 23.76 to 14.43% and 2.29 to 0.78% as the pyrolysis temperature was increased from 300 to 600 C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe adsorption rates decreased thereafter and approached equilibrium by 48 h.
“The adsorption rates decreased thereafter and approached equilibrium by 48 h.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyrolysis temperature is positively correlated with the ash content of spent tea leaves (STL) biochar; ash content increased from 5.84 to 17.89% as temperature increased from 300 to 600 C.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
“The ash content of STL biochar increased from 5.84 to 17.89% with increasing pyrolysis temperature (Table 1) due to loss of organic matter and accumulation of inorganic compounds, and showed an exponential curve (Figure 1(b); Adj.R 2 ¼ 0.980).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyrolysis duration had a statistically significant effect on the yield and CEC of STL biochar, but not on ash content, pH, or EC.
“duration | | 7.661* | 3.679 | 1.17 | 1.701 | 14.965*”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe maximum Cd(II) adsorption capacity of STL biochar produced at 600 C for 2 h was 1.38-1.63, 1.07-1.26 and 1.01-1.14 times greater than that of biochar samples produced at 300, 400 and 500 C respectively.
“According to the saturation threshold of the best matching model, the STL biochar produced at 600 C for 2 h showed the maximum Cd(II) adsorption capacity of 97.415 mg/g, which was 1.38-1.63,1.07-1.26and 1.01-1.14times greater than that of biochar samples produced at 300, 400 and 500 C respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSEM micrographs of STL biochar showed a smoother surface and pores blocked with volatile organic compounds at low pyrolysis temperatures.
“Consistent with the above results, the SEM micrographs of STL biochar showed a smoother surface and pores blocked with volatile organic compounds at low pyrolysis temperatures (Figure 5(a), 5(b), 5(e), 5(f)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyrolysis temperature is negatively correlated with the total yield of STL biochar; yield decreased significantly from 52.17% to 26.71% as temperature increased from 300 to 600 C.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
“Consistent with this, the yield of STL biochar decreased significantly from 52.17% to 26.71% as the temperature was increased from 300 to 600 C (Table 1; P < 0.01).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe cation exchange capacity (CEC) of STL biochar ranged from 107.97 to 407.79 cmol/kg and was higher at lower temperatures (300 and 400 C).
“The CEC ranged from 107.97 to 407.79 cmol/kg, and was higher at lower temperatures (300 and 400 C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCd(II) adsorption increased in acidic solutions of pH 2-5 and decreased as the acidity diminished, with optimal uptake seen at pH 5.
“Specifically, Cd(II) adsorption increased in acidic solutions of pH 2-5 and decreased as the acidity diminished, with optimal uptake seen at pH 5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyrolysis at 500 and 600 C significantly increased the surface cracks and holes of STL biochar, indicating a highly porous structure.
“However, pyrolysis at 500 and 600 C significantly increased the surface cracks and holes, indicating a highly porous structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOver the studied pH range, STL biochar produced at 600 C showed the maximum adsorption of Cd(II) and that produced at 300 C showed the least adsorption capacity.
“Over the studied pH range, STL biochar produced at 600 C showed the maximum adsorption of Cd(II) and that produced at 300 C showed the least adsorption capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningPyrolysis temperature is negatively correlated with the O/C atomic ratio of STL biochar; the O/C ratio was 52.25% lower in biochar produced at 600 C compared to 300 C.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
“In addition, the O/C and H/C ratios were respectively 52.25% and 62.24% lower in the biochar produced at 600 C compared to that at 300 C, which can be attributed to a greater degree of dehydration and decarboxylation at high temperatures (Ahmad et al.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyrolysis temperature is negatively correlated with the O content of STL biochar; O content decreased from 23.76 to 14.43% as temperature increased from 300 to 600 C.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
“The average C content increased from 64.26 to 81.44%, while that of H, O and N respectively decreased from 3.71 to 1.78%, 23.76 to 14.43% and 2.29 to 0.78% as the pyrolysis temperature was increased from 300 to 600 C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIncreasing pyrolysis temperature from 300 to 600°C increased the carbon content and C/N ratio and decreased the H, O, N, O/C, and H/C ratios of STL biochar.
“C | (%) | 62.55 | 65.96 | 69.68 | 70.82 | 72.47 | 74.15 | 80.70 | 82.18”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
“H | (%) | 3.86 | 3.55 | 3.23 | 3.06 | 2.53 | 2.24 | 1.88 | 1.67”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
“O | (%) | 24.67 | 22.84 | 21.84 | 19.77 | 17.16 | 16.63 | 15.38 | 13.48”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyrolysis temperature is negatively correlated with the N content of STL biochar; N content decreased from 2.29 to 0.78% as temperature increased from 300 to 600 C.
“The pyrolysis temperature was positively correlated to the ash content, pH, electrical conductivity, specific surface area (S BET ), pore volume (PV) and C content, and negatively with the total yield, O, H and N content, and the O/C and H/C atomic ratios.”
- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
“The average C content increased from 64.26 to 81.44%, while that of H, O and N respectively decreased from 3.71 to 1.78%, 23.76 to 14.43% and 2.29 to 0.78% as the pyrolysis temperature was increased from 300 to 600 C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Characteristics of STL biochar · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyrolysis temperature had a statistically significant effect on the yield, ash content, pH, EC, and CEC of STL biochar.
“Temperature | | 787.344** | 399.224** | 531.125** | 118.023** | 457.141**”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSTL biochar with pH above 7.3 had more than 10% ash content, while samples with less than 7% ash content were acidic (pH < 7).
“The STL biochar with pH above 7.3 had more than 10% ash content, while samples with less than 7% ash content were acidic (pH < 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe pseudo-second-order model described Cd(II) adsorption kinetics better than the pseudo-first-order model for the tested STL biochars, as indicated by higher R2 values.
“1 h | 300 C | 26.376 | 0.997 | 0.876 | 28.207 | 0.053 | 0.988 | 27.97”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe Langmuir model fitted Cd(II) adsorption isotherms better than the Freundlich model for the tested STL biochars, as indicated by higher R2 values.
“1 h | 300 C | 48.279 | 0.017 | 0.994 | 4.592 | 0.431 | 0.974”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataFor STL biochar produced at any given pyrolysis temperature, increasing the pyrolysis duration from 1 h to 2 h increased the carbon content and C/N ratio and decreased the H, O, N, O/C, and H/C ratios.
“C | (%) | 62.55 | 65.96 | 69.68 | 70.82 | 72.47 | 74.15 | 80.70 | 82.18”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
“H | (%) | 3.86 | 3.55 | 3.23 | 3.06 | 2.53 | 2.24 | 1.88 | 1.67”
- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
“O | (%) | 24.67 | 22.84 | 21.84 | 19.77 | 17.16 | 16.63 | 15.38 | 13.48”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe experimental Cd(II) adsorption capacity (qe,exp) of STL biochar increased with pyrolysis temperature and duration.
“1 h | 300 C | 26.376 | 0.997 | 0.876 | 28.207 | 0.053 | 0.988 | 27.97”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe Langmuir maximum adsorption capacity (QL) for Cd(II) on STL biochar increased with pyrolysis temperature and duration.
“1 h | 300 C | 48.279 | 0.017 | 0.994 | 4.592 | 0.431 | 0.974”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe STL biochar was well carbonized and had sparse oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface.
“Taken together, the STL biochar was well carbonized and had sparse oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPyrolysis at higher temperatures increases the exposed surface area as well as the number of adsorption sites on biochar for heavy metal ions.
“Taken together, pyrolysis at higher temperatures increases the exposed surface area as well as the number of adsorption sites on biochar for heavy metal ions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The physiochemical properties of STL biochar that affect its ability to adsorb Cd(II) are still not well understood.
“However, the physiochemical properties of STL biochar that affect its ability to adsorb Cd(II) are still not well understood.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Kinetic time and rate constants use incompatible time units
MinorThe kinetic equations use t measured in hours, but both rate constants are specified per minute. Without a conversion, their products in the stated equations have inconsistent units.
“q t (mg/g) is the amount of Cd adsorbed at time t (h)”
“k 1 (1/min) and k 2 (g/mg min) is the rate constant for adsorption kinetics.”
Reported O/C range excludes a table value
MinorThe stated minimum O/C ratio is 0.19, whereas Table 2 gives 0.16 for biochar produced at 600 C for 2 h.
“The O/C and H/C atomic ratios are indicative of the degree of aromaticity and polarity of biochar, and ranged from 0.19-0.39 and 0.02-0.06respectively (Figure 3).”
“| O/C | / | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.16 |”
Cites
Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review
Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., Vithanage, M., Lee, S. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2014) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071 · Cited by 4,662 · see citing works
Self-citationDynamic Molecular Structure of Plant Biomass-Derived Black Carbon (Biochar)
Keiluweit, M., Nico, P. S., Johnson, M. G., & Kleber, M. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9031419 · Cited by 3,230 · see citing works
Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions
Tan, X., Liu, Y., Zeng, G., Wang, X., Hu, X., Gu, Y., & Yang, Z. (2015) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.058 · Cited by 2,081 · see citing works
Self-citationThe forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures
Yuan, J.-H., Xu, R.-K., & Zhang, H. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.018 · Cited by 2,029 · see citing works
Günay, A., Arslankaya, E., & Tosun, İ. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.034 · Cited by 1,122 · see citing works
Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance
Enders, A., Hanley, K., Whitman, T., Joseph, S., & Lehmann, J. (2012) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.022 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
Al-Wabel, M. I., Al-Omran, A., El-Naggar, A. H., Nadeem, M., & Usman, A. R. A. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.165 · Cited by 1,026 · see citing works
(2009) · Cited by 884 · see citing works
Effect of pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, and residence time on rapeseed stem derived biochar
Zhao, B., O'Connor, D., Zhang, J., Peng, T., Shen, Z., Tsang, D. C. W., & Hou, D. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.013 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
Fan, S., Wang, Y. N., Wang, Z., Tang, J., Tang, J., & Li, X. (2016) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.019 · Cited by 708 · see citing works
Competitive adsorption of heavy metals onto sesame straw biochar in aqueous solutions
Park, J., Ok, Y. S., Kim, S.-H., Cho, J.-S., Heo, J.-S., DeLaune, R. D., & Seo, D.-C. (2015) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.093 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Kim, K. H., Kim, J.-Y., Cho, T.-S., & Choi, J. W. (2012) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.094 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500°C
Lee, Y., Park, J., Ryu, C., Gang, K. S., Yang, W., Park, Y.-K., Jung, J., & Hyun, S. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.135 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Wang, H., Gao, B., Wang, S., Fang, J., Xue, Y., & Yang, K. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.132 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties
Suliman, W., Harsh, J. B., Abu-Lail, N. I., Fortuna, A.-M., Dallmeyer, I., & Garcia-Perez, M. (2016) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.010 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Liu, J., & Liu, R. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.011 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Li, B., Yang, L., Wang, C., Zhang, Q.-P., Liu, Q., Li, Y., & Xiao, R. (2017) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.061 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Hameed, B. H. (2008) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.019 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Potential mechanisms of cadmium removal from aqueous solution by Canna indica derived biochar
Cui, X., Fang, S., Yao, Y., Li, T., Ni, Q., Yang, X., & He, Z. L. (2016) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.248 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Zhou, Q., Liao, B., Lin, L., Qiu, W., & Song, Z. (2017) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.220 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Chen, Z., Xiao, X., Chen, B., & Zhu, L. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es5043468 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Zhou, L., Liu, Y., Liu, S., Yin, Y., Zeng, G., Tan, X., Hu, X., Hu, X., Jiang, L., Ding, Y., et al. (2016) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.102 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Zhang, F., Wang, X., Yin, D., Peng, B., Tan, C., Liu, Y., Tan, X., & Wu, S. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.043 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Zama, E. F., Zhu, Y., Reid, B. J., & Sun, G.-X. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.125 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Thermogravimetric Analysis−Fourier Transform Infrared Analysis of Palm Oil Waste Pyrolysis
Yang, H., Yan, R., Chin, T., Liang, D. T., Chen, H., & Zheng, C. (2004) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef030193m · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Gao, L.-Y., Deng, J.-H., Huang, G.-F., Li, K., Cai, K.-Z., Liu, Y., & Huang, F. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.138 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Na, L., Charrua, A. B., Weng, C., Yuan, X., & Ding, F. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.129 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Chandra, S., & Bhattacharya, J. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.079 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Thangalazhy‐Gopakumar, S., Adhikari, S., Ravindran, H., Gupta, R. B., Fasina, O., Tu, M., & Fernando, S. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.040 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Effect of different biochar and fertilizer types on N2O and NO emissions
Nelissen, V., Saha, B. K., Ruysschaert, G., & Boeckx, P. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.12.026 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Mimmo, T., Panzacchi, P., Baratieri, M., Davies, C. A., & Tonon, G. (2014) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.004 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Sun, J., He, F., Pan, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2016) · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science · doi:10.1080/09064710.2016.1214745 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Elaigwu, S. E., Rocher, V., Kyriakou, G., & Greenway, G. M. (2013) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.036 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Wang, X., Zhou, W., Liang, G., Song, D., & Zhang, X. (2015) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.026 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Luo, M., Lin, H., He, Y., Li, B., Dong, Y., & Wang, L. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.108 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Biosorption of Co (II) from aqueous solution using algal biochar: Kinetics and isotherm studies
Bordoloi, N., Goswami, R., Kumar, M., & Kataki, R. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.139 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Tang, C., Shu, Y., Zhang, R., Li, X., Song, J., Li, B., Zhang, Y., & Ou, D. (2017) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c6ra28035h · Cited by 161 · see citing works
A bioseparation process for removing lead(II) ions from waste water by using C. vulgaris
Aksu, Z., & Kutsal, T. (1991) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.280520108 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Zhang, C., Shan, B., Tang, W., & Zhu, Y. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.051 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationHigashikawa, F. S., Conz, R. F., Colzato, M., Cerri, C. E. P., & Alleoni, L. R. F. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.205 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Aghababaei, A., Ncibi, M. C., & Sillanpää, M. E. T. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.119 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Simultaneous removal of cadmium and sulfamethoxazole from aqueous solution by rice straw biochar
Han, X., Liang, C., Li, T., Wang, K., Huang, H., & Yang, X. (2013) · Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B · doi:10.1631/jzus.b1200353 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Srinivasan, P., & Sarmah, A. K. (2014) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.048 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Anupam, K., Sharma, A. K., Lal, P. S., Dutta, S., & Maity, S. (2016) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.100 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Tan, G., Wu, Y., Liu, Y., & Xiao, D. (2018) · Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2017.12.031 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Adsorption characteristics of methylene blue by biochar prepared using sheep, rabbit and pig manure
Huang, W., Chen, J., & Zhang, J. (2018) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-018-2906-1 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Removal studies of Cd(II) and explosive compounds using buffalo weed biochar-alginate beads
Roh, H., Yu, M.-R., Yakkala, K., Koduru, J. R., Yang, J., & Chang, Y. (2014) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2014.11.034 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Influence of pH, Ionic Strength, and Multidentate Ligand on the Interaction of CdIIwith Biochars
Uchimiya, M. (2014) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/sc5002269 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Kausar, A., MacKinnon, G., Alharthi, A. I., et al. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2018.02.101 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Cao, P., Yang, D., Zhu, J., Liu, Z., Jiang, D., & Xu, H. (2018) · Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12199-018-0696-1 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Oh, S., & Seo, Y. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.064 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Removal of copper(II) from aqueous solution using spent tea leaves (STL) as a potential sorbent
Bajpai, S. K., & Jain, A. (2010) · Water SA · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Re-use of agricultural wastes for the removal and recovery of Zr(IV) from aqueous solutions
Kausar, A., Bhatti, H. N., & MacKinnon, G. (2016) · Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2015.08.016 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Gaur, N., & Dhankhar, R. (2009) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tu, P., Zhang, G., Wei, G., Li, J., Li, Y., Deng, L., & Yuan, H. (2022) · Bioresources and Bioprocessing · doi:10.1186/s40643-022-00618-z · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Gao, Z., Shan, D., He, J., Huang, T., Mao, Y., Tan, H., Shi, H., Li, T., & Xie, T. (2022) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128563 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Leaf-based biochar: A review of thermochemical conversion techniques and properties
Adeniyi, A. G., Iwuozor, K. O., Emenike, E. C., Amoloye, M. A., Adeleke, J. A., Omonayin, E. O., Bamigbola, J. O., Ojo, H. T., & Ezzat, A. O. (2024) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2024.106352 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Engineered Biochar for Metal Recycling and Repurposed Applications
Hasan, M., Chakma, S., Liang, X., Sutradhar, S., Koziński, J. A., & Kang, K. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17184674 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Characterization of algae residue biochar and its application in methyl orange wastewater treatment
Zhu, H. W., & Zou, H. (2021) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2021.473 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Zhu, H. W., & Zou, H. (2022) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ra04263k · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“31,32 In the preparation process, the introduction of other compounds to modify biochar can increase its surface area and functional groups and improve its adsorption and catalytic performance.”
BackgroundPei, S., Fan, X., Qiu, C., Liu, N., Li, F., Li, J., Li, Q., & Wang, S. (2024) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2024.199 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Kozioł, A., Paliwoda, D., Mikiciuk, G., & Benhadji, N. (2024) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture14122165 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Borgohain, A., Sarmah, M., Konwar, K., Gogoi, R., Gogoi, B. B., Khare, P., Paul, R. K., Handique, J. G., Malakar, H., Deka, D., et al. (2022) · Food Chemistry X · doi:10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100255 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Hao, L., Zhao, Z., Zhou, H., Wen, L., Liu, X., Yu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124569 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationRoles of soluble minerals in Cd sorption onto rice straw biochar
Fei, Y., Zhang, Z., Ye, Z., Wu, Q., Tang, Y., & Xiao, T. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2021.05.027 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Medeiros, D. C. C. D. S., Usman, M., Chelme‐Ayala, P., Saeed, S., Al-Shaikh, I. M., Bekele, A., & El‐Din, M. G. (2024) · Waste Management Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.wmb.2024.12.001 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Tu, S.-F., Chu, Y., Chen, T.-L., Hsi, H., Ma, H., & Ting, Y.-C. (2025) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114845 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Theories and applications of tea residue adsorbing aroma compounds: a review
Xu, L., Ma, C., Chen, X., et al. (2024) · Beverage Plant Research · doi:10.48130/bpr-0024-0030 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Najafi, H., Laye, Z. R., & Sobati, M. A. (2023) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117753 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Zhao, Z., Zhang, L., Lou, Y., et al. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11203243 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Therefore, it is speculated that the strong absorbability of tea [41] may be an important reason for reducing the effective antibacterial concentration of polypeptides on tea substrate, or there are other factors affecting the antibacterial activity of polypeptides on tea substrates that need to be further studied.”
BackgroundKavindi, G. A. G., Tang, L., Sasaki, Y., et al. (2025) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2025.104657 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sufian, J., Sari, M. B., Avanes, A., & Moradi, S. (2025) · Water Practice & Technology · doi:10.2166/wpt.2025.047 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Li, Q., Gao, X., Li, D., Li, C., Zhang, S., Wang, S., Li, B., Cui, Z., Tang, Y., Tursunov, O. B., et al. (2024) · Journal of the Energy Institute · doi:10.1016/j.joei.2024.101530 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Gray, G. F., Usman, M., Feng, Q., Aoudi, B., Medeiros, D. C. C. D. S., Chelme‐Ayala, P., Xu, B., & El‐Din, M. G. (2026) · Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2026.101533 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Farooqi, Z. U. R., Waqas, M., Li, J., Bai, J., Ao, C., Liu, X., & Ahmad, S. (2026) · Water · doi:10.3390/w18151843 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationHassan, M. A., Swify, R. M., Rizk, N. M., Mohammed, M. T. M., Ragab, G. A., & Almeelbi, T. B. (2026) · Applied Water Science · doi:10.1007/s13201-026-02867-1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Vindhya, Sohal, H. S., Kaur, N., et al. (2026) · Surfaces and Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2026.109012
Pai, Y., Kao, C.-C., & Lin, S. H. (2026) · Materials Today Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2026.114893
Suleiman, M. A. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44581-1.00004-1
Pai, Y., Kao, C.-C., Chen, W., et al. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5164012
Comparison of Cd(II) adsorption performance on two phosphate modified straw biochar
Tao, T. (2023) · Desalination and Water Treatment · doi:10.5004/dwt.2023.29443 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“As shown in Table 2, the correlation coefficients of the pseudo-first-order kinetic model and Elovich model were smaller than those of the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, indicating that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model can more accurately describe the Cd(II) adsorption process [34].”
Method
- Authors
- Yang, Z., Liu, X., Zhang, M., Liu, L., Xu, X., Xian, J., & Cheng, Z.
- Affiliations
- Sichuan Agricultural University (CN)
- College of Environment, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 61130, China
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Zhanbiao
- Venue
- Water Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IWA Publishing
- Published
- 2020-06-15
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2533-2544
- ISSN
- 0273-1223 (ISSN-L)
- 1996-9732
- OpenAlex
- W3039776681
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Water Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21507095)
- Sichuan Provincial Youth Science and Technology Fund (Grant No. 2017JQ0035)
- Sichuan Province Project Education Fund (Grant No. 16ZA0036)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Keywords
- spent tea leaves, biochar, pyrolysis temperature, pyrolysis duration, cadmium adsorption, heavy metal removal, physicochemical properties, surface porosity, oxygen-containing functional groups, pseudo-second-order kinetics, Langmuir isotherm, low-cost adsorbent, wastewater treatment
- MeSH terms
- Pyrolysis, Adsorption, Cadmium, Charcoal, Tea, Temperature, Plant Leaves
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review