Cited by 321Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsHeavy metals in environment

Relative distribution of Cd2+ adsorption mechanisms on biochars derived from rice straw and sewage sludge

Open access
Gao, Li-Yang, Deng, Jin-Huan, Huang, Guo-Fu, Li, Kai, Cai, Kun-Zheng, Liu, Yan, Huang, Fei·2019·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Qualitative and quantitative characterization of Cd 2+ adsorption mechanisms was performed with rice-straw and sewage-sludge biochars produced at different temperature (300-700 °C), respectively. The pH effect, adsorption kinetics and isotherms were investigated, and chemical analyses of Cd 2+-loaded biochars were conducted by SEM-EDS, XRD, FTIR and Boehm titration. This demonstrated that rice-straw biochars (RSBs) have greater adsorption capacities for Cd 2+ than sewage-sludge biochars (SSBs), which was mainly due to precipitation and cation exchange mechanisms, with their contribution proportion to total adsorption from 76.1% to 80.8%. While in SSBs, both mechanisms were overshadowed by coordination with π electrons mechanism accounting for 59.2%-62.9% of total adsorption, even the role of cation exchange was negligible in the adsorption mechanisms accounting for 2.3%-6.7%. The relationship of each mechanism with biochar's properties were discussed, which further deepen our understanding of adsorption on biochars. These results suggest RSBs have great potential for removing Cd 2+ from aqueous solutions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.138

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, L.-Y., Deng, J.-H., Huang, G.-F., Li, K., Cai, K.-Z., Liu, Y., & Huang, F.
Affiliations
  • South China Agricultural University (CN)
  • China Academy of Engineering Physics (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Fei
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
272
Pages
114-122
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893818424
Cited by
321
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 2
FWCI
13.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2014A030310320, 2017A030313177)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41501338)
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2017YFD0801000)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
cadmium adsorption, biochar, rice straw biochar, sewage sludge biochar, adsorption mechanism, precipitation chemistry, cation exchange, adsorption isotherms, adsorption kinetics, pH effect, heavy metal removal from water, pyrolysis temperature
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Cadmium, Charcoal, Kinetics, Oryza, Sewage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review