The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language Learner Autonomy: Some Fundamental Considerations Revisited
Abstract
The concept of learner autonomy is often applied to the process and content of language learning but not specifically to its intended outcome, the development of proficiency in a second or foreign language. Against this tendency, the present paper argues for an understanding of language learner autonomy in which the development of learner autonomy and the growth of target language proficiency are mutually supporting and fully integrated with each other. It further argues that only on the basis of such an understanding can learner autonomy move to the centre of language teaching theory and practice. The paper begins by considering the origins of the universally accepted definition of learner autonomy, ‘the ability to take charge of one's own learning’. It then briefly reviews social-psychological and cognitive evidence in favour of promoting learner autonomy before discussing constructivist theories of pedagogy and their implications for a theory of language learner autonomy. From this it derives three fundamental principles – of learner involvement, learner reflection and target language use – and concludes by considering some of the ways in which these principles may be implemented in the language classroom.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING *
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851 · cited 1×
“Support or scaffolding (Wood et al ., 1976) can take many forms.”
BackgroundBruner, J. (1996) · doi:10.4159/9780674251083 · Cited by 6,231
Gass, S. M. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch9 · Cited by 542
Cited by
Engagement with language: interrogating a construct
Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2009) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658410903197264 · Cited by 405
Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing
Kessler, G. (2009) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44169 · Cited by 355
Shen, B., Bai, B., & Xue, W. (2020) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821 · Cited by 108
Gabryś-Barker, D. (2021) · Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64444-4_10 · Cited by 15
Listening to Romanian Teenagers: Lessons in Motivation and ELT Methodology
Taylor, F. (2013) · International Perspectives on Motivation · doi:10.1057/9781137000873_3 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Little, D.
- Venue
- Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-04-16
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-29
- ISSN
- 1750-1229 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-1237
- OpenAlex
- W2028374159
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 90.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Language Learner Autonomy: Some Fundamental Considerations Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2167/illt040.0
- The paper
- Little, D. (2007). Language Learner Autonomy: Some Fundamental Considerations Revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.