Cited by 81Extraction and Separation ProcessesGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes

Techno-Economic Analysis of Lithium Extraction from Geothermal Brines

Open access
Warren, Ian·2021

Abstract

The United States has a large, domestic source of lithium in geothermal fluids, especially at the Salton Sea region of southern California, where estimates of lithium pass-through at geothermal plants exceed 24,000 metric tons per year, based on 2019 geothermal plant operations. Lithium extraction from geothermal brines offers the potential to provide the United States with a secure, domestic supply of lithium to meet the increasing demands of electric vehicles, grid energy storage, portable electronics, and other end-use applications. Additionally, the use of direct extraction technologies allows for a more sustainable lithium supply relative to current evaporative brine and hardrock mining operations in terms of land use, water use, time to market with lithium products, and carbon intensity of operations. This report is part of an effort to assess geothermal brines as a source of commercial lithium supply for the United States. In this study, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) reviews and summarizes public technoeconomic analyses of lithium extraction technologies. The work was coordinated with the Critical Minerals Institute at the Colorado School of Mines who focused on supply chain analysis of lithium.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This NREL report reviews public techno-economic analyses of direct lithium extraction (DLE) from geothermal and other brines, concluding that production costs near $4,000/metric ton lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) are achievable and economically feasible at modeled prices above ~$11,000/mt Li₂CO₃. The Salton Sea KGRA is identified as the most promising U.S. resource, with estimated lithium throughput exceeding 24,000 mt/year.

Key findings

  • Reported DLE production costs cluster near $4,000/mt LCE: SRI International's Salton Sea estimate is $3,845/mt LCE, Berkshire Hathaway Energy targets <$4,000/mt LCE, and EnergySource's project is inferred near $4,000/mt LCE for 16,500 mt LCE/year. Table 3 lists project costs from $3,217/mt (Vulcan, Standard Lithium) to $4,545/mt (Anson Resources).
  • Positive internal rates of return suggest feasibility at modeled prices >$11,000/mt Li₂CO₃ and >$12,267/mt LiOH•H₂O; spot prices since mid-2018 ranged from ~$20,000/mt to $7,500/mt LCE.
  • Salton Sea brine flow of 121,308,148 mt (2019) at a conservative 200 mg/L lithium implies ~24,000 mt/year lithium throughput, convertible to nearly 127,000 mt of lithium carbonate; the KGRA has an inferred resource of 15 million mt and could produce >600,000 mt LCE/year if fully developed.
  • Pilot results: Simbol recovered >95% of lithium as LiCl over 3,500 hours at Elmore and 9,000 hours at Featherstone, with >90% conversion yield to Li₂CO₃/LiOH•H₂O; EnergySource's ILiAD pilot showed >99.5% monovalent/divalent removal and >90% lithium recovery; Ventura et al. (2020) recovered 90% of lithium from Salton Sea brine in a 100-hour packed-bed test.

Methods

  • Literature and public-document review: NREL reviewed published techno-economic analyses, DOE- and California Energy Commission-funded project reports, patent documents, and Preliminary Economic Assessments/Pre-Feasibility Studies filed with Canadian and Australian exchanges (coordinated with the Colorado School of Mines Critical Minerals Institute).
  • No new process modeling was performed; cost estimates were compiled from bench- and pilot-scale studies scaled up to commercial estimates, plus reported OPEX breakdowns (Tables 4–7) and a summary DLE project economics table (Table 3) covering geothermal, evaporite, oilfield, and salar brines.
  • Supporting data include brine composition tables for the Salton Sea KGRA and chemical analyses from Simbol's Elmore and Featherstone pilot tests.

Limitations

  • Stated: few pilot-scale field tests of lithium extraction from geothermal brines exist, and publicly available cost and performance data are limited; detailed cost/performance data from Simbol's pilots are not publicly available; robust modeling requires proprietary process details; PEA/PFS estimates are not guarantees of project success; Anson Resources' Phase 3 PEA was retracted owing to reliance on inferred resources (cost estimates retained as valid).
  • Stated: each geothermal fluid requires a uniquely tailored process, so no single model applies across brines or Salton Sea operations.
  • Evident from the text: the headline ~$4,000/mt LCE figure rests largely on scaled-up bench-scale results and company-reported estimates rather than demonstrated commercial operations; reservoir impacts of cooler, lithium-depleted injectate and lithium re-saturation are unresolved and flagged as needing reservoir modeling.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2172/1782801

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 76 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning
    § Executive Summary

    Reported internal rates of return suggest the reviewed lithium extraction projects are economically feasible at modeled prices of ≥$11,000/mt LCE (or >$11,000/mt Li2CO3 and >$12,267/mt LiOH•H2O).

    “A review of these projects indicates expected production costs (i.e., operating expenses or OPEX) near $4,000/metric ton of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) and reported internal rates of return suggest this production cost target is economically feasible with estimated prices of ≥$11,000/mt LCE.”
    • Also stated in: § 4 Techno-Economic Analysis · hedged
      “Cost estimates typically focus on reported OPEX ($/mt lithium product), and positive Internal Rate of Return (IRR) suggests that the projects reviewed are economically feasible at modeled prices >$11,000/mt Li2CO3 and >$12,267/mt LiOH•H2O (see Table 3 below).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Cost data from DLE projects using geothermal, salar, oilfield, and evaporite brines are informative for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
    • Rests on an assumption: The reported OPEX and IRR from public company reports are accurate and representative of commercial-scale lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
  • Findingcitation
    § Executive Summary

    Of the technologies proposed for direct lithium extraction from brines, those currently advancing to pilot- and near-commercial-scale demonstrations involve adsorption and ion exchange techniques.

    “Of these technologies, the ones currently advancing to pilot-and near-commercial-scale demonstrations involve adsorption and ion exchange techniques.”
    • Also stated in: § 4 Techno-Economic Analysis · plain
      “Diverse DLE processes can be applied to extraction of lithium from geothermal brines, and the most advanced studies and pilot demonstrations in the United States have focused on adsorption and ion-exchange methods at the Salton Sea KGRA (Harrison 2014; Ventura et al. 2020; EnergySource Minerals 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Harrison 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ventura et al. 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites EnergySource Minerals 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data
    § Executive Summary

    A review of projects focused on lithium extraction from geothermal and other brine types indicates expected production costs (OPEX) near $4,000/metric ton of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE).

    “A review of these projects indicates expected production costs (i.e., operating expenses or OPEX) near $4,000/metric ton of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) and reported internal rates of return suggest this production cost target is economically feasible with estimated prices of ≥$11,000/mt LCE.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Cost data from DLE projects using geothermal, salar, oilfield, and evaporite brines are informative for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
    • Rests on an assumption: The reported OPEX and IRR from public company reports are accurate and representative of commercial-scale lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
  • Findingnone given
    § 4 Techno-Economic Analysis

    Only Ventura et al. (2020) have reported an estimated cost of lithium production from Salton Sea brine.

    “Only Ventura et al. (2020) have reported an estimated cost of lithium production from Salton Sea brine (Section 4.2), so additional data from DLE projects exploiting other brine types are included to better inform cost estimates (Section 4.1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ventura et al. (2020)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation
    § 4.3 Planned and Ongoing Demonstrations

    A demonstration at the Salton Sea began in 2020 with financial support from the California Energy Commission through its EPIC program.

    “One of the most recently announced projects is a demonstration at the Salton Sea that began in 2020 with financial support from California Energy Commission through their EPIC program (BHER Minerals 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BHER Minerals 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 71
  • May combine two claims. 51
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given
    § Executive Summary

    There have been few pilot-scale field tests focused on extraction of lithium from geothermal brines.

    “Mineral extraction from geothermal brines in the Salton Sea and elsewhere has a decades-long history, but there have been few pilot-scale field tests focused on extraction of lithium from geothermal brines.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given
    § Executive Summary

    There are limited publicly available cost and performance data to fully evaluate the techno-economics of lithium extraction from geothermal brine.

    “There are also limited publicly available cost and performance data to fully evaluate the techno-economics of lithium extraction from geothermal brine.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Executive Summary

    The United States has a large domestic source of lithium in geothermal fluids, especially at the Salton Sea region of southern California, where estimated lithium pass-through at geothermal plants exceeds 24,000 metric tons per year based on 2019 geothermal plant operations, convertible to nearly 127,000 mt of lithium carbonate.

    “The United States has a large, domestic source of lithium in geothermal fluids, especially at the Salton Sea region of southern California, where estimates of lithium pass-through at geothermal plants exceed 24,000 metric tons per year, based on 2019 geothermal plant operations.”
    • Also stated in: § 1.1 Project Motivation and Goals · hedged
      “This represents an estimated annual lithium throughput of approximately 24,000 mt that can be converted to nearly 127,000 mt of lithium carbonate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites CalGEM 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites McKibben and Hardie 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Executive Summary

    Recent and ongoing lab studies on direct lithium extraction from brines have focused largely on sorbent and solvent performance, with goals to increase lithium selectivity relative to competing ions, increase operating cycles between regeneration and replacement, and lower costs of sorbent and solvent manufacturing.

    “Recent and ongoing lab studies on direct lithium extraction (DLE) from brines have focused largely on sorbent and solvent performance, with goals to increase lithium selectivity relative to competing ions, increase operating cycles between regeneration and replacement, and lower costs of sorbent and solvent manufacturing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Some of the DLE projects (Table 3; Appendix A) report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).

    Some DLE projects report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).

    “Some of the DLE projects (Table 3; Appendix A) report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines

    Available data and estimates of costs for lithium extraction from geothermal brines are limited.

    “Available data and estimates of costs for lithium extraction from geothermal brines are limited”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines

    Salton Sea plant operators have decades of experience managing pre-processing to enable power generation and post-processing to prevent scaling of injection wells.

    “Salton Sea plant operators have decades of experience managing pre-processing to enable power generation and post-processing to prevent scaling of injection wells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Marston and Garska (2019)

    Materials and infrastructure are already in place at Salton Sea geothermal power plants if scale inhibition processes are required.

    “Materials and infrastructure are already in place at Salton Sea geothermal power plants if scale inhibition processes are required.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Materials and infrastructure are already in place at Salton Sea geothermal power plants if scale inhibition processes are required.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines

    Salton Sea geothermal power plants had throughput in 2019 equivalent to 127,750 mt LCE (121,308,148 mt with average lithium concentration of 200 mg/L).

    “Salton Sea geothermal power plants had throughput in 2019 equivalent to 127,750 mt LCE (121,308,148 mt with average lithium concentration of 200 mg/L).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Marston and Garska (2019)

    There is no detailed public information regarding modification of fluid after lithium extraction and prior to injection.

    “There is no detailed public information regarding modification of fluid after lithium extraction and prior to injection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines

    Detailed U.S. patent documents describe in detail the process proposed by EnergySource.

    “detailed U.S. patent documents (e.g., Marston and Garska 2019) describe in detail the process proposed by EnergySource.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marston and Garska 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines

    The feedstock for lithium extraction comes from downstream of the secondary clarifier.

    “The feedstock for lithium extraction comes from downstream of the secondary clarifier.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines

    EnergySource and Berkshire Hathaway have operating power plants at the Salton Sea and are planning lithium extraction demonstrations.

    “EnergySource and Berkshire Hathaway have operating power plants at the Salton Sea and are planning lithium extraction demonstrations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 4.3 Planned and Ongoing Demonstrations

    Multiple companies are pursuing DLE projects focused on geothermal and other brines; most important demonstrations for U.S. lithium production are focused on Salton Sea brines.

    “Multiple companies are pursuing DLE projects focused on geothermal and other brines (e.g., Table 3); however, the most important demonstrations for U.S. lithium production are focused on Salton Sea brines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3 Planned and Ongoing Demonstrations

    Pilot testing demonstrated monovalent and divalent removal >99.5% and lithium recovery >90%.

    “Pilot testing demonstrated monovalent and divalent removal >99.5% and lithium recovery >90% (Figure 7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.3 Planned and Ongoing Demonstrations

    EnergySource has reported successful completion of pilot testing of its patented ILiAD technology.

    “They have reported successful completion of pilot testing of their patented Integrated Lithium Adsorption Desorption (ILiAD) technology, which combines lithiumselective sorbent with continuous bed processing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4.3 Planned and Ongoing Demonstrations

    The demonstration facility will be sited at an existing geothermal power plant, with the project managed by BHER Minerals.

    “The demonstration facility will be sited at an existing geothermal power plant, with the project managed by BHER Minerals (wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BHER Minerals 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    Bench column experiments with LDH have shown high selectivity for lithium relative to competing ions, and LDH sorbents are low cost and environmentally benign without consuming reagent chemicals or producing secondary waste.

    “Bench column experiments with LDH have shown high selectivity for lithium relative to competing ions, and LDH sorbents are low cost and environmentally benign without consuming reagent chemicals or producing secondary waste.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    Other Li-Mn-O and Li-Ti-O chemistries have been explored with positive results.

    “Other Li-Mn-O and Li-Ti-O chemistries have been explored with positive results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    LDHs have slightly lower capacity but good selectivity, are relatively inexpensive to regenerate, and are stable through many cycles.

    “LDHs have slightly lower capacity but good selectivity, are relatively inexpensive to regenerate, and are stable through many cycles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    There is no single model to apply to all geothermal brines or even to different brine and power plant operations in the Salton Sea KGRA.

    “there is no single model to apply to all geothermal brines or even to different brine and power plant operations in the Salton Sea KGRA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § A.2 SRI International

    The treated brine contained 319 mg/L Li, 77,173 mg/L Na, 27,409 mg/L K, 42,831 mg/L Ca, and 694 mg/L Sr.

    “the treated brine contained 319 mg/L Li, 77,173 mg/L Na, 27,409 mg/L K, 42,831 mg/L Ca, and 694 mg/L Sr”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Electrodialysis

    Chromatography is a proven technology in industrial applications for chemical separations, and researchers at NREL have recently begun investigating application of simulated moving bed chromatography to extraction of lithium and other materials from brines.

    “Chromatography is a proven technology in industrial applications for chemical separations, and researchers at NREL have recently begun investigating application of simulated moving bed chromatography to extraction of lithium and other materials from brines (Karp 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Karp 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Electrodialysis

    Established commercial solvent extraction expertise is being directed toward advancing the technique's application to lithium extraction from brines.

    “Established commercial solvent extraction expertise (e.g., Tenova) is also being directed toward advancing the technique's application to lithium extraction from brines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Additional information

    During pilot testing at the Elmore and Featherstone power plants, more than 93% of silica and 98% percent of Fe (II) were removed as filter cake.

    “During pilot testing at the Elmore and Featherstone power plants, more than 93% of silica and 98% percent of Fe (II) were removed as filter cake.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harrison 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § Additional information

    Removal of 95% of arsenic was achieved by oxidizing 20%-30% of the iron between pH values of 3 and 4 before precipitation of silica-iron filter cake.

    “Importantly, removal of 95% of arsenic was achieved by oxidizing 20%-30% of the iron between pH values of 3 and 4 before precipitation of silica-iron filter cake.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harrison 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1.1 Project Motivation and Goals

    U.S. lithium consumption from 2015 through 2019 is estimated to be 2,000-3,000 mt per year, convertible to nearly 16,000 mt of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE).

    “This is significant-U.S. lithium consumption from 2015 through 2019 is estimated to be 2,000-3,000 mt per year, which can be converted to nearly 16,000 mt of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) (Jaskula 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jaskula 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1.1 Project Motivation and Goals

    From 2015-2019, U.S. net import reliance as a percentage of estimated consumption was typically >50%, with imports primarily from Argentina (53%), Chile (40%), and China (3%).

    “From 2015-2019, net import reliance as a percentage of estimated consumption was typically >50%, with imports primarily coming from Argentina (53%), Chile (40%), and China (3%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jaskula 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1.1 Project Motivation and Goals

    In 2018, estimated lithium extraction and processing from evaporation ponds and hardrock leaching made up approximately 46% and 54%, respectively, of the current economically profitable lithium production methods.

    “In 2018, estimated lithium extraction and processing from evaporation ponds and hardrock leaching made up approximately 46% and 54%, respectively, of the current economically profitable lithium production methods (Facada 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Facada 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Executive Summary

    Use of direct extraction technologies allows for a more sustainable lithium supply relative to current evaporative brine and hardrock mining operations in terms of land use, water use, time to market with lithium products, and carbon intensity of operations.

    “Additionally, the use of direct extraction technologies allows for a more sustainable lithium supply relative to current evaporative brine and hardrock mining operations in terms of land use, water use, time to market with lithium products, and carbon intensity of operations.”
    • Also stated in: § 2.3 Other Methods of Lithium Extraction · plain
      “DLE technologies can be added to existing geothermal power plants or built into the design of future plants and have distinct advantages over evaporative ponds and hardrock mining with respect to sustainability related to land use, water use, time to market with lithium products, and carbon intensity of operations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1.1 Project Motivation and Goals

    The latest U.S. Geological Survey's Mineral Commodities Summary estimates that 65% of lithium end use globally is for lithium-ion batteries, and this market is expected to grow rapidly in coming years.

    “The latest U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) Mineral Commodities Summary (Jaskula 2020) estimates that 65% of the lithium end use globally is for lithium-ion batteries, and this market is expected to grow rapidly in coming years.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jaskula 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § Executive Summary

    Many techniques and process strategies proposed to extract lithium directly from geothermal and other brines can be generally categorized into adsorption, ion exchange, and solvent extraction techniques.

    “Many techniques and process strategies have been proposed to extract lithium directly from geothermal and other brines, and these can be generally categorized into adsorption, ion exchange, and solvent extraction techniques.”
    • Also stated in: § 2.3 Other Methods of Lithium Extraction · plain
      “DLE technologies can be broadly grouped into three main categories: adsorption, ion exchange, and solvent extraction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Executive Summary

    Since mid-2018, lithium carbonate spot market prices have ranged from approximately $20,000/mt to $7,500/mt and lithium hydroxide monohydrate from $21,000/mt to $10,000/mt.

    “For comparison, market prices since mid-2018 have ranged from approximately $20,000/mt to $7,500/mt LCE.”
    • Also stated in: § 2 Lithium Extraction Technology · plain
      “Since mid-2018, lithium carbonate spot market prices have ranged from approximately $20,000/mt to $7,500/mt and lithium hydroxide monohydrate from $21,000/mt to $10,000/mt (Fastmarkets, 2021) with lowest prices coming during the COVID-19-related, global economic downturn and reduction in demand.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fastmarkets, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1 Lithium Occurrence in Geothermal Brines

    Less than 1% of geothermal fluid samples from primarily the western United States have lithium concentrations >20 mg/kg, and the highest concentrations are from the Salton Sea, with values up to 400 mg/kg.

    “Notably, less than 1% of samples have lithium concentrations >20 mg/kg, and the highest concentrations are from the Salton Sea, with values up to 400 mg/kg.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Neupane and Wendt (2017)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Executive Summary

    Improved performance of sorbents and solvents will be primary drivers of future cost reductions and improved economics for lithium extraction from geothermal brines.

    “Improved performance of sorbent and solvents will be primary drivers of future cost reductions and improved economics for lithium extraction from geothermal brines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.1 Proposed Direct Lithium Extraction Projects

    Ultimately, a specific geothermal fluid will require a best-fit lithium extraction process, or combination of processes, based on fluid composition and physical and chemical requirements related to power generation and reservoir management.

    “Ultimately, a specific geothermal fluid will require a best-fit lithium extraction process, or combination of processes, based on fluid composition and physical and chemical requirements related to power generation and reservoir management.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.1 Proposed Direct Lithium Extraction Projects

    Some oilfield and evaporite brine projects have advanced to pilot scale and provide confidence in the technical feasibility of DLE.

    “Some of the oilfield and evaporite brine projects have advanced to pilot scale and provide confidence in the technical feasibility of DLE”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Proposed Direct Lithium Extraction Projects

    Bench-scale studies of sorbents and Upper Rhine Valley geothermal fluid indicate potential to extract >90% of lithium from brine containing 181 mg/kg lithium.

    “bench-scale studies of sorbents and Upper Rhine Valley geothermal fluid indicate the potential to extract >90% of lithium from brine containing 181 mg/kg lithium (Vulcan Energy Resources 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vulcan Energy Resources 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 DOE Support of Lithium Extraction from Geothermal Brines

    Renew and Hansen (2017) performed a techno-economic analysis that suggested their lithium extraction process would not be economically viable, particularly with respect to Li concentration (150 mg/L) and Li2CO3 ($20,000/mt) price sensitivity used in their study.

    “Renew and Hansen (2017) performed a techno-economic analysis that suggested the process would not be economically viable, particularly with respect to Li concentration (150 mg/L) and Li2CO3 ($20,000/mt) price sensitivity used in their study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Renew and Hansen (2017)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2 Overview of Minerals Extraction from Geothermal Brines

    Optimal lithium recovery parameters will vary based on the specific physical and chemical properties of target geothermal fluids.

    “An important lesson for lithium extraction was noted by the authors-optimal lithium recovery parameters will vary based on the specific physical and chemical properties of target geothermal fluids.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Berthold and Baker (1976)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 DOE Support of Lithium Extraction from Geothermal Brines

    Higher lithium concentrations (300 mg/L), higher Li2CO3 prices ($28,000/mt), or reduced capital costs (-27%) potentially could support project economics for the Renew and Hansen process.

    “Higher concentrations (300 mg/L), higher prices ($28,000/mt), or reduced capital costs (-27%) potentially could support project economics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Renew and Hansen (2017)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2 Overview of Minerals Extraction from Geothermal Brines

    Optimal lithium recovery (>98%) from post-flash Salton Sea brine was achieved with Al/Li ratios of 3/1, pH 7.5, and temperature 75°-85°C.

    “Optimal lithium recovery (>98%) was achieved with Al/Li ratios of 3/1, pH 7.5, and temperature 75°-85°C.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Berthold and Baker (1976)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2 Overview of Minerals Extraction from Geothermal Brines

    Schultze and Bauer (1984) described one of the earliest processes considered economic for recovery of lithium from geothermal brines at the Salton Sea, with recovery of 99% of lithium as LiCl.

    “Schultze and Bauer (1984) described one of the earliest processes considered economic for recovery of lithium from geothermal brines at the Salton Sea, with recovery of 99% of lithium as LiCl (Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schultze and Bauer (1984)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Marston and Garska (2019)

    The tail fluid will be cooler than the normal injection stream, and this could potentially affect reservoir temperatures if large volumes of cooled, post-lithium-extraction fluid are injected for many years.

    “The tail fluid will be cooler than the normal injection stream, and this could potentially affect reservoir temperatures if large volumes of cooled, post-lithium-extraction fluid are injected for many years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines

    A projected Li2CO3 price of $12,000/mt suggests a cost near $4,000/mt LCE for planned production of 16,500 mt LCE per year.

    “projected Li2CO3 price of $12,000/mt, suggests a cost near $4,000/mt LCE for planned production of 16,500 mt LCE per year (EnergySource 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites EnergySource 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Some of the DLE projects (Table 3; Appendix A) report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).

    Power generation processes can benefit lithium extraction with the potential to provide power, heat, and water for downstream operations.

    “Power generation processes can benefit lithium extraction with the potential to provide power, heat, and water for downstream operations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines

    The primary differences between non-geothermal brine processes and those applied to geothermal brine at the Salton Sea are required pre-processing to manage silica, iron and other metals and, if required, post-processing to ensure appropriate physical and chemical properties of injected tail brine.

    “Generally, the primary differences between non-geothermal brine processes and those applied to geothermal brine at the Salton Sea are required pre-processing to manage silica, iron and other metals and, if required, post-processing to ensure appropriate physical and chemical properties of injected tail brine”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Some of the DLE projects (Table 3; Appendix A) report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).

    Geothermal brines have unique brine pre-treatments required for power generation, and the power generation process influences the physical and chemical properties of injection fluid that is the source brine for lithium extraction.

    “Geothermal brines also have unique brine pre-treatments required for power generation, and the power generation process influences the physical and chemical properties of injection fluid that is the source brine for lithium extraction operations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Some of the DLE projects (Table 3; Appendix A) report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).

    Each project has unique physical, chemical, and economic requirements that help determine the optimized DLE process.

    “Each project has unique physical, chemical, and economic requirements that help determine the optimized DLE process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines

    Lithium extraction benefits from crystallizer and clarifier processes to remove silica and iron as pre-treatment for the power generation process.

    “Lithium extraction benefits from crystallizer and clarifier processes to remove silica and iron as pre-treatment for the power generation process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines

    Other processes commercialized at the Salton Sea will vary in design but share many of the same process steps and likely have costs near $4,000/mt LCE.

    “Though other processes that might be commercialized at the Salton Sea will vary in design (e.g., BHER Minerals 2020), they will share many of the same process steps and likely have costs near $4,000/mt LCE.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BHER Minerals 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    Li2TiO3 is the precursor for hydrated titanium oxide (H2TiO3) sorbent, which has high lithium capacity and selectivity, despite studies documenting some co-adsorbed sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium at non-negligible levels.

    “Li2TiO3) is the precursor for hydrated titanium oxide (H2TiO3) sorbent, which has high lithium capacity and selectivity, despite studies that document some co-adsorbed sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium at non-negligible levels (Chitrakar et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chitrakar et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3 Planned and Ongoing Demonstrations

    EnergySource is planning to build a lithium extraction facility at its Featherstone power plant, with construction starting in 2021 and operations beginning in 2023.

    “EnergySource is planning to build a lithium extraction facility at their Featherstone power plant, with construction starting in 2021 and operations beginning in 2023 (EnergySource 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites EnergySource 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    Robust modeling of lithium extraction from geothermal brines requires explicit process details, many of which are proprietary.

    “robust modeling of lithium extraction from geothermal brines requires explicit process details, many of which are proprietary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    Stringfellow and Dobson (2021) note that large-scale, expensive demonstration projects are necessary to advance lithium extraction from geothermal brines toward commercialization.

    “They also note that large-scale, expensive demonstration projects are necessary to advance lithium extraction from geothermal brines toward commercialization”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stringfellow and Dobson (2021)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    These prices are within the range of spot market prices since mid-2018.

    “These prices are within the range of spot market prices since mid-2018”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    Stringfellow and Dobson (2021) report that lithium extraction with inorganic molecular sieve ion-exchange sorbents is the most developed technology and note that sorbent selectivity, sorbent tolerance for interfering ions, and purity of extracted lithium are the main cost drivers.

    “Stringfellow and Dobson (2021) report that lithium extraction with inorganic molecular sieve ion-exchange sorbents is the most developed technology and note that sorbent selectivity, sorbent tolerance for interfering ions, and purity of extracted lithium are the main cost drivers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stringfellow and Dobson (2021)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    Paranthanam et al. (2017) reported that further improvements can be made in the quality of sorbent materials related to recovery efficiency, lithium capacity, selectivity relative to other competing bulk ions, and stability.

    “Paranthanam et al. (2017) reported that further improvements can be made in the quality of sorbent materials related to recovery efficiency, lithium capacity, selectivity relative to other competing bulk ions, and stability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Paranthanam et al. (2017)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    Increased lithium demand is expected in the future.

    “increased lithium demand is expected in the future (Chao 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chao 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Future Considerations

    The most recent review of lithium extraction techniques is by Stringfellow and Dobson (2021), which provides descriptions and extensive documentation of methods being investigated by researchers.

    “The most recent review of lithium extraction techniques is by Stringfellow and Dobson (2021), which provides descriptions and extensive documentation of methods being investigated by researchers (Table 8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stringfellow and Dobson (2021)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Electrodialysis

    The application of ionic liquids for solvent extraction shows promise for developing high-lithium-affinity and highly efficient extraction processes.

    “The application of ionic liquids for solvent extraction shows promise for developing highlithium-affinity and highly efficient extraction processes (Yang et al. 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yang et al. 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Electrodialysis

    Because of the high concentration of lithium, Salton Sea geothermal brines are an obvious target for DLE.

    “Because of the high concentration of lithium, Salton Sea geothermal brines are an obvious target for DLE.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Electrodialysis

    The need for DLE process power and water is mitigated by the availability of on-site geothermal power, heat, and water, giving geothermal sites a potential advantage over other DLE brine targets.

    “Need for DLE process power and water is mitigated by the availability of on-site geothermal power, heat, and water (RO-processed condensate).This gives geothermal sites a potential advantage over other DLE brine targets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Electrodialysis

    In addition to lithium, other valuable minerals could potentially be extracted from geothermal brines.

    “In addition to lithium, other valuable minerals could potentially be extracted from geothermal brines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Electrodialysis

    Stoichiometries of chemical reactions and combinations of reactions guide the application of DLE in terms of reagent and materials costs.

    “Stoichiometries of chemical reactions and combinations of reactions guide the application of DLE in terms of reagent and materials costs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Electrodialysis

    If inexpensive and sustainable chemistries can be developed, solvent extraction may be particularly suitable for geothermal brines with modest lithium concentrations.

    “If inexpensive and sustainable chemistries can be developed, solvent extraction may be particularly suitable for geothermal brines with modest lithium concentrations (e.g., most brines outside the Salton Sea).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Electrodialysis

    Lithium extraction from Salton Sea brines will benefit from cost reductions associated with increased sorbent selectivity for lithium with respect to competing ions and from decreased pre-treatment requirements.

    “Lithium extraction from Salton Sea brines will benefit from cost reductions associated with increased sorbent selectivity for lithium with respect to competing ions such as sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium and from decreased pre-treatment requirements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § A.2 SRI International

    An alternative to HCl for sorbent regeneration is important in order to minimize deleterious effects on the hydrated manganese oxide caused by Mn solubility in HCl.

    “An alternative to HCl for sorbent regeneration was deemed important to minimize deleterious effects on the hydrated manganese oxide due to Mn solubility in HCl.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Electrodialysis

    Fracture controlled permeability and hydrothermal alteration potentially limit injectate's contact with lithium-rich rocks.

    “Fracture controlled permeability and hydrothermal alteration potentially limit injectate's contact with lithium-rich rocks (e.g., silicified selvages to permeable fractures).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Electrodialysis

    Diversity of fluid physical and chemical properties and variations in operational conditions require lithium extraction processes to be uniquely tailored to the target geothermal reservoir and power plant.

    “Diversity of fluid physical and chemical properties and variations in operational conditions (e.g., plant rejection temperature) require lithium extraction processes to be uniquely tailored to the target geothermal reservoir and power plant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Additional information

    Anson Resources Paradox Basin project is located in Utah and consists of three phases of development.

    “Anson Resources Paradox Basin project is located in Utah and consists of three phases of development (Anson Resources 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anson Resources 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A.9 Lake Resources

    In Alsace, France, geothermal fluids have measured temperatures up to 205°C and lithium concentrations up to 162 mg/L.

    “In Alsace, France, geothermal fluids have measured temperatures up to 205°C and lithium concentrations up to 162 mg/L(Sanjuan et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sanjuan et al. 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A.4 Vulcan Energy Resources

    Upper Rhine Valley brines most amenable to lithium extraction have chemistries of approximately 150-200 mg/kg lithium, 30,000 mg/kg sodium, 2,000 mg/kg potassium, 6,000 mg/kg calcium, and 400 mg/kg magnesium, from reservoirs measured up to 200°C with geothermometry indicating 225°C.

    “Upper Rhine Valley brines most amenable to lithium extraction have chemistries approximately 150-200 mg/kg lithium, 30,000 mg/kg sodium, 2,000 mg/kg potassium, 6,000 mg/kg calcium, and 400 mg/kg magnesium from reservoirs measured up to 200°C and with geothermometry indicating 225°C (Sanjuan et al. 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sanjuan et al. 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § A.6 E3 Metals Corp

    Pure Energy Minerals' Clayton Valley project brines contain up to 221 mg/L lithium and comprise a resource of 247,000 mt of lithium hydroxide monohydrate in saturated basin sediments from ~150-1,000 m below surface.

    “Pure Energy Minerals Clayton Valley project is in Nevada where they plan to produce 11,500 mt per year of lithium hydroxide monohydrate (LiOH•H2O; LHM) from brines containing up to 221 mg/L lithium that comprise a resource of 247,000 mt of LHM in saturated basin sediments from ~150-1,000 m below surface.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § A.9 Lake Resources

    The tail brine contains an average lithium concentration of 168 mg/L, and the brine resource contains 3,140,000 mt LCE.

    “The tail brine contains an average lithium concentration of 168 mg/L, and the brine resource contains 3,140,000 mt LCE.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Additional information

    The bromine-lithium brine is hosted in sedimentary units ~1,900 m below surface that are intersected by historic hydrocarbon wells.

    “The bromine-lithium brine is hosted in sedimentary units ~1,900 m below surface that are intersected by historic hydrocarbon wells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anson Resources 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § A.9 Lake Resources

    Lake Resources' Kachi project salar brine indicated resource comprises 1 million tons LCE with a concentration of 250 mg/L lithium contained in saturated sediments that extend to 880 m below surface.

    “The salar brine indicated resource comprises 1 million tons LCE with a concentration of 250 mg/L lithium contained in saturated sediments that extend to 880 m below surface.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Additional information

    The information about Anson Resources' proposed lithium extraction process and estimates of costs remain valid, separate from the issue of overall project viability.

    “Despite that, the information about the proposed lithium extraction process and estimates of costs remain valid, separate from the issue of overall project viability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The PEA for Anson Resources' Phase 3 was retracted soon after it was released because of its significant reliance on inferred resources.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § A.6 E3 Metals Corp

    Tenova's novel extraction process for the Clayton Valley project was confirmed with a mini-pilot test using a synthetic brine matched to the physical and chemical properties of naturally occurring Clayton Valley brines.

    “Tenova has developed a novel extraction process that was confirmed with a mini-pilot test using a synthetic brine to match the physical and chemical properties of naturally occurring Clayton Valley brines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A.9 Lake Resources

    Upper Rhine Valley geothermal fluids have measured temperatures up to 200°C and lithium concentrations up to 210 mg/L.

    “Upper Rhine Valley geothermal fluids have measured temperatures up to 200°C and lithium concentrations up to 210 mg/L(Sanjuan et al. 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sanjuan et al. 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A.9 Lake Resources

    Standard Lithium began testing a lithium extraction demonstration plant in late 2020 using the tail brine from Lanxess bromine extraction operations in Arkansas, and they plan to scale up to a 20,900 mt/yr commercial operation.

    “Standard Lithium began testing a lithium extraction demonstration plant in late 2020 using the tail brine from Lanxess bromine extraction operations in Arkansas, and they plan to scale up to a 20,900 mt/yr commercial operation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Standard Lithium (2019)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § A.4 Vulcan Energy Resources

    In late 2020 Standard Lithium produced concentrated LiCl solution from their demonstration plant in Arkansas, processing 50 gpm of brine from the Lanxess South Plant.

    “In late 2020, Standard Lithium announced that they had successfully produced concentrated LiCl solution from their demonstration plant in Arkansas operating under optimized and refined processes summarized above and processing 50 gpm of brine from the Lanxess South Plant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § A.9 Lake Resources

    Extraction from less lithium-rich brines has also been studied at Wairakei, New Zealand, where lithium concentrations are only ~13 mg/L.

    “Extraction from less lithium-rich brines has also been studied at Wairakei, New Zealand, where lithium concentrations are only ~13 mg/L(Mroczek et al. 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mroczek et al. 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § A.6 E3 Metals Corp

    E3 Metals' oilfield brine of the Leduc Formation in Alberta, Canada has an average lithium concentration of 74.6 mg/L with a resource estimated at 2.2 million mt LCE.

    “The average lithium concentration is 74.6 mg/L with a resource estimated at 2.2 million mt LCE.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A.9 Lake Resources

    Other processes that might be commercialized at the Salton Sea will vary in design but will share many of the same process steps and likely have costs near $4,000/mt LCE.

    “Though other processes that might be commercialized at the Salton Sea will vary in design (e.g., BHER Minerals 2020), they will share many of the same process steps and likely have costs near $4,000/mt LCE.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BHER Minerals 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Additional information

    The purified brine, containing mostly Li + , K + and Na + cations, is suitable for electrolysis and crystallization to form LiOH•H2O, while water removed from the brine prior to electrolysis can be used as make-up water for lithium processing.

    “The purified brine, containing mostly Li + , K + and Na + cations, is suitable for electrolysis and crystallization to form LiOH•H2O, while water removed from the brine prior to electrolysis can be used as make-up water for lithium processing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites E3 Metals Corp. (2020)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Additional information

    Silica removal via sorbents was problematic due to required large volumes of stripping solution and degradation of the sorbents.

    “Silica removal via sorbents was problematic due to required large volumes of stripping solution and degradation of the sorbents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harrison 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Additional information

    The brine is estimated to contain 192,000 mt LCE with lithium concentrations up to 253 mg/L.

    “The brine is estimated to contain 192,000 mt LCE with lithium concentrations up to 253 mg/L.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anson Resources 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Additional information

    The sorbent chosen for development to commercial scale exhibited high capacity, low affinity for impurities, and production via a simple two-step process.

    “The sorbent chosen for development to commercial scale exhibited high capacity, low affinity for impurities, and production via a simple two-step process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harrison 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Additional information

    The main process steps for lithium extraction were demonstrated at pilot scale: silica management, lithium extraction, purification, concentration, and conversion into lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate products.

    “The main process steps for lithium extraction were demonstrated at pilot scale: (1) silica management; ( 2) lithium extraction; (3) purification; (4) concentration; and (5) conversion into lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate products.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harrison 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Additional information

    Simbol focused on the recovery of lithium manganese, zinc, and potassium from pre-injection brines at the Elmore (CalEnergy) and Featherstone (EnergySource) power plants.

    “Simbol focused on the recovery of lithium manganese, zinc, and potassium from pre-injection brines at the Elmore (CalEnergy) and Featherstone (EnergySource) power plants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harrison 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Additional information

    Of the two novel processes, silica removal via sorbent was deemed less costly and potentially economical for polishing solutions with low silica concentrations.

    “Of the two novel processes, silica removal via sorbent was deemed less costly and potentially economical for polishing solutions with low silica concentrations (Harrison 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harrison 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Additional information

    Silica removal using precipitants was problematic due to required large caustic volumes to maintain pH at optimal levels and, for some precipitants, lithium was also extracted.

    “Silica removal using precipitants was problematic due to required large caustic volumes to maintain pH at optimal levels and, for some precipitants, lithium was also extracted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harrison 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Additional information

    The electrolysis process forms a weak sulfuric acid stream, which is recycled to the elution stage, reducing the need for purchase of large quantities of reagent.

    “The electrolysis process forms a weak sulfuric acid stream, which is recycled to the elution stage, reducing the need for purchase of large quantities of reagent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites E3 Metals Corp. (2020)

      Not checked in the free run.

94 of 94
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cost data from DLE projects using geothermal, salar, oilfield, and evaporite brines are informative for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.

    “These projects are focused on geothermal, salar, oilfield, and evaporite brines, all of which are informative for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The reported OPEX and IRR from public company reports are accurate and representative of commercial-scale lithium extraction from geothermal brines.

    “In the present study, we are mainly limited to understanding techniques and costs made publicly available by companies with projects advanced to stages of development and investment that require formal reporting to stock exchanges in Canada and Australia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Conversion of hardrock mining concentrate to battery-grade lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide costs $2,000-2,500/mt of mined concentrate depending on lithium concentration and bulk chemistry.

    “Conversion to these battery-grade forms can cost $2,000-2,500/mt of mined concentrate depending on the lithium concentration and bulk chemistry.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Simbol Phase 3 cost estimates remain valid despite retraction owing to large inferred resources.

    “Phase 3 estimates were retracted owing to large inferred resources, but cost estimates remain valid.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Materials and infrastructure are already in place at Salton Sea geothermal power plants if scale inhibition processes are required.

    “Materials and infrastructure are already in place at Salton Sea geothermal power plants if scale inhibition processes are required.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The projected Li2CO3 price is $12,000/mt.

    “projected Li2CO3 price of $12,000/mt”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The PEA for Anson Resources' Phase 3 was retracted soon after it was released because of its significant reliance on inferred resources.

    “The PEA for Phase 3 was retracted soon after it was released because of its significant reliance on inferred resources.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Lake Resources labor cost per ton does not match annual cost

    Minor

    Lake Resources plans to produce 25,500 mt per year. Its reported annual labor cost of $10,900,000 therefore equals about $427 per ton, not the listed $394 per ton.

    Reported 394 · recomputed 427.45098

  • Lake Resources utility cost per ton does not match annual cost

    Minor

    At the stated production rate of 25,500 mt per year, the $42,100,000 annual utility cost equals about $1,651 per ton, not $1,677.

    Reported 1677 · recomputed 1650.980392

  • A positive return is reported at-not above-$11,000 per ton

    Minor

    The text says positive returns occur at modeled lithium carbonate prices above $11,000 per ton, but Table 3 reports a 25% pre-tax IRR for Lake Resources at exactly $11,000 per ton.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Chitrakar, R., Y. Makita, K. Ooi, and A. Sonoda. 2014. "Lithium recovery from salt lake brine by H2TiO3." Dalton Transactions 43, no. 23: 8933-8939.
  2. Clutter, T. J. 2000. "Mining Economic Benefits from Geothermal Brine." Quarterly Bulletin 21, no. 2: 1-3.
  3. Grant, A. 2020. "Disruption or Evolution?" Benchmark Q1 Review 2020: Lithium Extraction: 46-52.
  4. Kennedy, A.M. 1961. "The recovery of lithium and other metals from geothermal water at Wairakei." Proceedings of United Nations Conference on New Sources of Energy, Conf. 35/ G/56: 502-511.
  5. Ling, L., V. G. Deshmane, M. P. Paranthaman, R. Bhave, B. A. Moyer, and S. Harrison. 2018. "Lithium Recovery from Aqueous Resources and Batteries: A Brief Review." Johnson Matthey Technology Review 62, no. 2: 161-176.
  6. Liu, G., Z. Zhao, and A. Ghahreman. 2019. "Novel approaches for lithium extraction from salt- lake brines: A review." Hydrometallurgy 187: 81-100.
  7. Neupane, G., and D.S. Wendt. 2017. "Assessment of Mineral Resources in Geothermal Brines in the US." 42nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University.
  8. Palmer, T.D. 1975 "Characteristics of geothermal wells located in the Salton Sea geothermal field, Imperial County, California." Lawrence Livermore Laboratory UCRL-51976. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/7356054
  9. Renew, J., and T. Hansen. 2017. "Geothermal thermoelectric generation (G-TEG) with integrated temperature driven membrane distillation and novel manganese oxide for lithium extraction." United States. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1360976
  10. Simmons, S.F., S. Kirby, P. Verplanck, and K. Kelley. 2018. "Strategic and Critical Elements in Produced Geothermal Fluids from Nevada and Utah." 43 rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University.
  11. Stringfellow, W.T., and P. F. Dobson. 2021. "Technology for Lithium Extraction in the Context of Hybrid Geothermal Power." 46 th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University.
  12. Ventura, S., S. Bhamidi, and M. Hornbostel. 2018. "Selective recovery of lithium from brines." 43 rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warren, I.
Affiliations
National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
Corresponding author
Warren, Ian
Published
2021-05-01
OpenAlex
W3163261753
Cited by
81
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE -AC36-08GO28308, 08GO28308, DE-AC36, Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308, AC36‐08GO28308)
  • Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (DE-AC36-08-GO28308., AC36-08-GO28308)
  • Geothermal Technologies Office (DE‐AC36‐08GO28308)
  • Office of Energy Efficiency
  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (DE-AC36-08-GO28308, AC36-08GO28308)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
Keywords
lithium recovery, geothermal brine, direct lithium extraction, Salton Sea, critical mineral supply chains, techno-economic analysis, hard rock mining, carbon intensity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review