Techno-Economic Analysis of Lithium Extraction from Geothermal Brines
Open accessAbstract
The United States has a large, domestic source of lithium in geothermal fluids, especially at the Salton Sea region of southern California, where estimates of lithium pass-through at geothermal plants exceed 24,000 metric tons per year, based on 2019 geothermal plant operations. Lithium extraction from geothermal brines offers the potential to provide the United States with a secure, domestic supply of lithium to meet the increasing demands of electric vehicles, grid energy storage, portable electronics, and other end-use applications. Additionally, the use of direct extraction technologies allows for a more sustainable lithium supply relative to current evaporative brine and hardrock mining operations in terms of land use, water use, time to market with lithium products, and carbon intensity of operations. This report is part of an effort to assess geothermal brines as a source of commercial lithium supply for the United States. In this study, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) reviews and summarizes public technoeconomic analyses of lithium extraction technologies. The work was coordinated with the Critical Minerals Institute at the Colorado School of Mines who focused on supply chain analysis of lithium.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This NREL report reviews public techno-economic analyses of direct lithium extraction (DLE) from geothermal and other brines, concluding that production costs near $4,000/metric ton lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) are achievable and economically feasible at modeled prices above ~$11,000/mt Li₂CO₃. The Salton Sea KGRA is identified as the most promising U.S. resource, with estimated lithium throughput exceeding 24,000 mt/year.
Key findings
- Reported DLE production costs cluster near $4,000/mt LCE: SRI International's Salton Sea estimate is $3,845/mt LCE, Berkshire Hathaway Energy targets <$4,000/mt LCE, and EnergySource's project is inferred near $4,000/mt LCE for 16,500 mt LCE/year. Table 3 lists project costs from $3,217/mt (Vulcan, Standard Lithium) to $4,545/mt (Anson Resources).
- Positive internal rates of return suggest feasibility at modeled prices >$11,000/mt Li₂CO₃ and >$12,267/mt LiOH•H₂O; spot prices since mid-2018 ranged from ~$20,000/mt to $7,500/mt LCE.
- Salton Sea brine flow of 121,308,148 mt (2019) at a conservative 200 mg/L lithium implies ~24,000 mt/year lithium throughput, convertible to nearly 127,000 mt of lithium carbonate; the KGRA has an inferred resource of 15 million mt and could produce >600,000 mt LCE/year if fully developed.
- Pilot results: Simbol recovered >95% of lithium as LiCl over 3,500 hours at Elmore and 9,000 hours at Featherstone, with >90% conversion yield to Li₂CO₃/LiOH•H₂O; EnergySource's ILiAD pilot showed >99.5% monovalent/divalent removal and >90% lithium recovery; Ventura et al. (2020) recovered 90% of lithium from Salton Sea brine in a 100-hour packed-bed test.
Methods
- Literature and public-document review: NREL reviewed published techno-economic analyses, DOE- and California Energy Commission-funded project reports, patent documents, and Preliminary Economic Assessments/Pre-Feasibility Studies filed with Canadian and Australian exchanges (coordinated with the Colorado School of Mines Critical Minerals Institute).
- No new process modeling was performed; cost estimates were compiled from bench- and pilot-scale studies scaled up to commercial estimates, plus reported OPEX breakdowns (Tables 4–7) and a summary DLE project economics table (Table 3) covering geothermal, evaporite, oilfield, and salar brines.
- Supporting data include brine composition tables for the Salton Sea KGRA and chemical analyses from Simbol's Elmore and Featherstone pilot tests.
Limitations
- Stated: few pilot-scale field tests of lithium extraction from geothermal brines exist, and publicly available cost and performance data are limited; detailed cost/performance data from Simbol's pilots are not publicly available; robust modeling requires proprietary process details; PEA/PFS estimates are not guarantees of project success; Anson Resources' Phase 3 PEA was retracted owing to reliance on inferred resources (cost estimates retained as valid).
- Stated: each geothermal fluid requires a uniquely tailored process, so no single model applies across brines or Salton Sea operations.
- Evident from the text: the headline ~$4,000/mt LCE figure rests largely on scaled-up bench-scale results and company-reported estimates rather than demonstrated commercial operations; reservoir impacts of cooler, lithium-depleted injectate and lithium re-saturation are unresolved and flagged as needing reservoir modeling.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 76 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning§ Executive Summary
Reported internal rates of return suggest the reviewed lithium extraction projects are economically feasible at modeled prices of ≥$11,000/mt LCE (or >$11,000/mt Li2CO3 and >$12,267/mt LiOH•H2O).
“A review of these projects indicates expected production costs (i.e., operating expenses or OPEX) near $4,000/metric ton of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) and reported internal rates of return suggest this production cost target is economically feasible with estimated prices of ≥$11,000/mt LCE.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Techno-Economic Analysis · hedged
“Cost estimates typically focus on reported OPEX ($/mt lithium product), and positive Internal Rate of Return (IRR) suggests that the projects reviewed are economically feasible at modeled prices >$11,000/mt Li2CO3 and >$12,267/mt LiOH•H2O (see Table 3 below).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cost data from DLE projects using geothermal, salar, oilfield, and evaporite brines are informative for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
- Rests on an assumption: The reported OPEX and IRR from public company reports are accurate and representative of commercial-scale lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
- Also stated in: § 4 Techno-Economic Analysis · hedged
- Findingcitation§ Executive Summary
Of the technologies proposed for direct lithium extraction from brines, those currently advancing to pilot- and near-commercial-scale demonstrations involve adsorption and ion exchange techniques.
“Of these technologies, the ones currently advancing to pilot-and near-commercial-scale demonstrations involve adsorption and ion exchange techniques.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Techno-Economic Analysis · plain
“Diverse DLE processes can be applied to extraction of lithium from geothermal brines, and the most advanced studies and pilot demonstrations in the United States have focused on adsorption and ion-exchange methods at the Salton Sea KGRA (Harrison 2014; Ventura et al. 2020; EnergySource Minerals 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Harrison 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ventura et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites EnergySource Minerals 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 4 Techno-Economic Analysis · plain
- Findingown data§ Executive Summary
A review of projects focused on lithium extraction from geothermal and other brine types indicates expected production costs (OPEX) near $4,000/metric ton of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE).
“A review of these projects indicates expected production costs (i.e., operating expenses or OPEX) near $4,000/metric ton of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) and reported internal rates of return suggest this production cost target is economically feasible with estimated prices of ≥$11,000/mt LCE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cost data from DLE projects using geothermal, salar, oilfield, and evaporite brines are informative for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
- Rests on an assumption: The reported OPEX and IRR from public company reports are accurate and representative of commercial-scale lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
- Findingnone given§ 4 Techno-Economic Analysis
Only Ventura et al. (2020) have reported an estimated cost of lithium production from Salton Sea brine.
“Only Ventura et al. (2020) have reported an estimated cost of lithium production from Salton Sea brine (Section 4.2), so additional data from DLE projects exploiting other brine types are included to better inform cost estimates (Section 4.1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ventura et al. (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ 4.3 Planned and Ongoing Demonstrations
A demonstration at the Salton Sea began in 2020 with financial support from the California Energy Commission through its EPIC program.
“One of the most recently announced projects is a demonstration at the Salton Sea that began in 2020 with financial support from California Energy Commission through their EPIC program (BHER Minerals 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites BHER Minerals 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ A.2 SRI International
A sorbent regeneration process using carbon dioxide was developed to concentrate lithium bicarbonate that is readily converted to high purity lithium carbonate.
“a sorbent regeneration process was developed using carbon dioxide to concentrate lithium bicarbonate that is readily converted to high purity lithium carbonate”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ A.3 Southern Research, Novus Energy Technologies, Carus Corporation, and Applied Membrane Technology Inc.
The synthetic brines studied by Renew and Hansen (2017) have significantly lower concentrations than Salton Sea brines with respect to all reported species.
“Notably, the synthetic brines studied have significantly lower concentrations than Salton Sea brines with respect to all reported species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Renew and Hansen (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ A.2 SRI International
The precipitate formed during brine treatment contained aluminum, manganese, iron, zinc, and small amounts of magnesium and calcium.
“The precipitate was analyzed by Xray diffraction and found to contain aluminum, manganese, iron, zinc, and small amounts of magnesium and calcium”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ Electrodialysis
A variety of DLE processes and brine types have estimated OPEX near $4,000/mt LCE.
“A variety of DLE processes and brine types have estimated OPEX near $4,000/mt LCE (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 3
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given§ A.4 Vulcan Energy Resources
Bench-scale direct lithium extraction studies with two commercially available sorbents using Upper Rhine Valley geothermal brine showed lithium recovery rates of more than 90%.
“Bench-scale DLE studies with two commercially available sorbents using Upper Rhine Valley geothermal brine showed Li recovery rates of more than 90%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2.1 Evaporative Brine Processing
According to S&P Global Market Intelligence (2019), production costs across 9 brine operations average $5,580/mt LCE.
“According to S&P Global Market Intelligence (2019), production costs across 9 brine operations average $5,580/mt LCE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites S&P Global Market Intelligence (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1.1 Project Motivation and Goals
A fully developed Salton Sea KGRA would be capable of producing more than 600,000 mt of LCE per year.
“A fully developed Salton Sea KGRA would be capable of producing more than 600,000 mt of LCE per year (Ventura et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ventura et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1.1 Project Motivation and Goals
The Salton Sea KGRA currently has an inferred lithium resource of 15 million mt.
“The Salton Sea KGRA currently has an inferred lithium resource of 15 million mt (Chao 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chao 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2.2 Hardrock Mining
According to S&P Global Market Intelligence (2019), production costs across 11 hardrock mining operations averaged $2,540/mt LCE.
“According to S&P Global Market Intelligence (2019), production costs across 11 hardrock mining operations averaged $2,540/mt LCE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites S&P Global Market Intelligence (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1.1 Project Motivation and Goals
Reported 2019 brine flow from the Salton Sea geothermal wellfields is 121,308,148 metric tons.
“Reported 2019 brine flow from the Salton Sea geothermal wellfields is 121,308,148 metric tons (mt) (CalGEM 2019), and a conservative average lithium concentration in geothermal brine is 200 mg/L (McKibben and Hardie 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CalGEM 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Executive Summary
Lithium extraction from geothermal brines offers the potential to provide the United States with a secure, domestic supply of lithium to meet increasing demands of electric vehicles, grid energy storage, portable electronics, and other end-use applications.
“Lithium extraction from geothermal brines offers the potential to provide the United States with a secure, domestic supply of lithium to meet the increasing demands of electric vehicles, grid energy storage, portable electronics, and other end-use applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1.1 Project Motivation and Goals
A conservative average lithium concentration in geothermal brine is 200 mg/L.
“Reported 2019 brine flow from the Salton Sea geothermal wellfields is 121,308,148 metric tons (mt) (CalGEM 2019), and a conservative average lithium concentration in geothermal brine is 200 mg/L (McKibben and Hardie 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McKibben and Hardie 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.1 Lithium Occurrence in Geothermal Brines
Simmons et al. (2018) found only a single sample from Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah (25 mg/kg) with lithium concentration >10 mg/kg among geothermal and oilfield brines from Nevada and Utah.
“Simmons et al. (2018) investigated strategic and critical element occurrence in geothermal and oilfield brines from Nevada and Utah with new sampling and analyses, and only a single sample from Roosevelt Hot Springs, Utah (25 mg/kg) was found to have lithium concentration >10 mg/kg.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Simmons et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Ventura et al. (2016) examined feasibility of developing a new generation of ion-exchange resins
Ventura et al. (2016) found their extraction processes to be economically viable in a preliminary process cost assessment.
“In a preliminary process cost assessment, the authors found their extraction processes to be economically viable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ventura et al. (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4.1 Proposed Direct Lithium Extraction Projects
Ventura et al. (2016) estimated a lithium production cost of $3,845/mt LCE using ion-imprinted polymer sorbents and synthetic Salton Sea brine.
“Ventura et al. (2016) report an estimated lithium production cost of $3,845/mt LCE using ionimprinted polymer sorbents and synthetic Salton Sea brine (Table 2; Appendix A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ventura et al. (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4 Techno-Economic Analysis
Additional data from DLE projects exploiting other brine types are included to better inform cost estimates for lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
“Only Ventura et al. (2020) have reported an estimated cost of lithium production from Salton Sea brine (Section 4.2), so additional data from DLE projects exploiting other brine types are included to better inform cost estimates (Section 4.1).”
- Also stated in: § 4.1 Proposed Direct Lithium Extraction Projects · plain
“These projects are focused on geothermal, salar, oilfield, and evaporite brines, all of which are informative for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cost data from DLE projects using geothermal, salar, oilfield, and evaporite brines are informative for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
- Also stated in: § 4.1 Proposed Direct Lithium Extraction Projects · plain
- Premisecitation§ 3.2 Overview of Minerals Extraction from Geothermal Brines
The estimated cost of $2.99 per pound LiCl ($6,590/mt LiCl; Schultze and Bauer 1984) equates to approximately $16,700/mt LiCl in today's dollars.
“Though the authors concluded that LiCl could be extracted economically from geothermal brine at the Salton Sea, the estimated cost of $2.99 per pound LiCl ($6,590/mt LiCl; Schultze and Bauer 1984) equates to approximately $16,700/mt LiCl in today's dollars.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schultze and Bauer 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3.2 Overview of Minerals Extraction from Geothermal Brines
The most salt-laden geothermal brines in the United States (20%-30% total dissolved solids) are located at the Salton Sea KGRA.
“The most salt-laden geothermal brines in the United States (20%-30% total dissolved solids) are located at the Salton Sea KGRA (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 1
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines
Ventura et al. (2020) estimated costs to extract lithium based on bench-scale experiments with Salton Sea brine and process modeling simulations.
“Ventura et al. (2020) estimated costs to extract lithium based on bench-scale experiments with Salton Sea brine and process modeling simulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ventura et al. (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1 Proposed Direct Lithium Extraction Projects
With reasonable assumptions, PEA and PFS cost estimates can provide guidance for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
“with reasonable assumptions, the PEA and PFS cost estimates can provide guidance for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Marston and Garska (2019)
With many highly concentrated species removed or partially removed during lithium extraction, composition of tail fluids is likely acceptable for injection.
“With many of the highly concentrated species removed or partially removed during the lithium extraction process, composition of tail fluids is likely to be acceptable for injection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines
Information from Salton-Sea-focused projects together provide a template for a potential process for commercial lithium extraction from geothermal brine and expected costs.
“Information from these Salton-Sea-focused projects together provide a template for a potential process for commercial lithium extraction from geothermal brine and expected costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines
EnergySource's proposed 16,500 mt/yr LCE output is equivalent to current U.S. annual demand reported by the USGS (<16,000 mt LCE).
“EnergySource's proposed 16,500 mt/yr LCE output is equivalent to current U.S. annual demand reported by the USGS (<16,000 mt LCE; Jaskula 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaskula 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines
Lithium extraction at the Salton Sea will exploit lithium-rich fluids downstream from the power generation process.
“Lithium extraction at the Salton Sea will exploit lithium-rich fluids downstream from the power generation process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal Brines
EnergySource's proposed output represents only part of the Salton Sea lithium resource (15 million mt).
“it represents only part of the Salton Sea lithium resource (15 million mt; Chao 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chao 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 4.4 Future Considerations
Each lithium extraction process will be unique to the specific physical and chemical conditions of brine and lithium extraction ± power generation operations.
“Each will be unique to the specific physical and chemical conditions of brine and lithium extraction ± power generation operations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4.4 Future Considerations
The range of brine types and lithium extraction processes reviewed suggests an OPEX near $4,000/mt LCE is achievable with modeled prices assumed to be >$11,000/mt Li2CO3 and >$12,267/mt LiOH•H2O.
“the range of brine types and lithium extraction processes reviewed herein suggest an OPEX near $4,000/mt LCE is achievable with modeled prices assumed to be >$11,000/mt Li2CO3 and >$12,267/mt LiOH•H2O (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 3
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Electrodialysis
Mixed matrix membranes have been developed comprising polymers and metal organic framework nanoparticles formed into thin films that can separate lithium from monovalent ions in high-salinity brines at high rates, efficiency, and selectivity.
“Mixed matrix membranes have been developed comprising polymers and metal organic framework nanoparticles formed into thin films that can separate lithium from monovalent ions in high-salinity brines at high rates, efficiency, and selectivity (Zhang et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A.2 SRI International
Ventura et al. (2020) estimate a production cost of $3,845/mt Li2CO3 using their sorbents and extraction process, based on a 50-MW Salton Sea power plant with 6,000 gpm throughput and 400 mg/kg Li in brine.
“Based on bench-scale experimental results, Ventura et al. (2020) estimate a production cost of $3,845/mt Li2CO3 using their sorbents and extraction process based on a 50-MW Salton Sea power plant with 6,000 gpm throughput and 400 mg/kg Li in brine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ventura et al. (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A.9 Lake Resources
Estimated costs based on detailed process modeling are $3,845/mt LCE.
“Estimated costs based on detailed process modeling (Ventura et al. 2020) are $3,845/mt LCE”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ventura et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ A.9 Lake Resources
EnergySource's reported project development and construction costs (~$350 million), combined with internal rate of return in the range reported by companies proposing DLE and projected Li2CO3 price of $12,000/mt, suggests a cost near $4,000/mt LCE for planned production of 16,500 mt LCE per year.
“EnergySource has not publicly provided costs, but their reported project development and construction costs (~$350 million), combined with internal rate of return in the range reported by companies proposing DLE (Table3) and projected Li2CO3 price of $12,000/mt, suggests a cost near $4,000/mt LCE for planned production of 16,500 mt LCE per year (EnergySource 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EnergySource 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The projected Li2CO3 price is $12,000/mt.
- Premisecitation§ A.9 Lake Resources
Simbol, SRI International, EnergySource, and Berkshire Hathaway Energy have proposed lithium-selective sorbents for lithium extraction from Salton Sea geothermal brines.
“Simbol (Harrison 2014), SRI International (Ventura et al. 2020), EnergySource (Marston and Garska 2019), and Berkshire Hathaway Energy (BHER Minerals 2020) have proposed lithiumselective sorbents for lithium extraction from Salton Sea geothermal brines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Harrison 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ventura et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Marston and Garska 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A.4 Vulcan Energy Resources
The potential for lithium extraction in the Upper Rhine Valley of southwest Germany is indicated by lithium concentrations in geothermal brine of up to 210 mg/kg lithium.
“the potential for lithium extraction is indicated by lithium concentration in geothermal brine up to 210 mg/kg lithium (Sanjuan et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sanjuan et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 71
- May combine two claims. 51
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone given§ Executive SummaryThere have been few pilot-scale field tests focused on extraction of lithium from geothermal brines.
“Mineral extraction from geothermal brines in the Salton Sea and elsewhere has a decades-long history, but there have been few pilot-scale field tests focused on extraction of lithium from geothermal brines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone given§ Executive SummaryThere are limited publicly available cost and performance data to fully evaluate the techno-economics of lithium extraction from geothermal brine.
“There are also limited publicly available cost and performance data to fully evaluate the techno-economics of lithium extraction from geothermal brine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Executive SummaryThe United States has a large domestic source of lithium in geothermal fluids, especially at the Salton Sea region of southern California, where estimated lithium pass-through at geothermal plants exceeds 24,000 metric tons per year based on 2019 geothermal plant operations, convertible to nearly 127,000 mt of lithium carbonate.
“The United States has a large, domestic source of lithium in geothermal fluids, especially at the Salton Sea region of southern California, where estimates of lithium pass-through at geothermal plants exceed 24,000 metric tons per year, based on 2019 geothermal plant operations.”
- Also stated in: § 1.1 Project Motivation and Goals · hedged
“This represents an estimated annual lithium throughput of approximately 24,000 mt that can be converted to nearly 127,000 mt of lithium carbonate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites CalGEM 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McKibben and Hardie 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 1.1 Project Motivation and Goals · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Executive SummaryRecent and ongoing lab studies on direct lithium extraction from brines have focused largely on sorbent and solvent performance, with goals to increase lithium selectivity relative to competing ions, increase operating cycles between regeneration and replacement, and lower costs of sorbent and solvent manufacturing.
“Recent and ongoing lab studies on direct lithium extraction (DLE) from brines have focused largely on sorbent and solvent performance, with goals to increase lithium selectivity relative to competing ions, increase operating cycles between regeneration and replacement, and lower costs of sorbent and solvent manufacturing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ Some of the DLE projects (Table 3; Appendix A) report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).Some DLE projects report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).
“Some of the DLE projects (Table 3; Appendix A) report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal BrinesAvailable data and estimates of costs for lithium extraction from geothermal brines are limited.
“Available data and estimates of costs for lithium extraction from geothermal brines are limited”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal BrinesSalton Sea plant operators have decades of experience managing pre-processing to enable power generation and post-processing to prevent scaling of injection wells.
“Salton Sea plant operators have decades of experience managing pre-processing to enable power generation and post-processing to prevent scaling of injection wells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ Marston and Garska (2019)Materials and infrastructure are already in place at Salton Sea geothermal power plants if scale inhibition processes are required.
“Materials and infrastructure are already in place at Salton Sea geothermal power plants if scale inhibition processes are required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Materials and infrastructure are already in place at Salton Sea geothermal power plants if scale inhibition processes are required.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal BrinesSalton Sea geothermal power plants had throughput in 2019 equivalent to 127,750 mt LCE (121,308,148 mt with average lithium concentration of 200 mg/L).
“Salton Sea geothermal power plants had throughput in 2019 equivalent to 127,750 mt LCE (121,308,148 mt with average lithium concentration of 200 mg/L).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Marston and Garska (2019)There is no detailed public information regarding modification of fluid after lithium extraction and prior to injection.
“There is no detailed public information regarding modification of fluid after lithium extraction and prior to injection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal BrinesDetailed U.S. patent documents describe in detail the process proposed by EnergySource.
“detailed U.S. patent documents (e.g., Marston and Garska 2019) describe in detail the process proposed by EnergySource.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marston and Garska 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal BrinesThe feedstock for lithium extraction comes from downstream of the secondary clarifier.
“The feedstock for lithium extraction comes from downstream of the secondary clarifier.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal BrinesEnergySource and Berkshire Hathaway have operating power plants at the Salton Sea and are planning lithium extraction demonstrations.
“EnergySource and Berkshire Hathaway have operating power plants at the Salton Sea and are planning lithium extraction demonstrations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 4.3 Planned and Ongoing DemonstrationsMultiple companies are pursuing DLE projects focused on geothermal and other brines; most important demonstrations for U.S. lithium production are focused on Salton Sea brines.
“Multiple companies are pursuing DLE projects focused on geothermal and other brines (e.g., Table 3); however, the most important demonstrations for U.S. lithium production are focused on Salton Sea brines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4.3 Planned and Ongoing DemonstrationsPilot testing demonstrated monovalent and divalent removal >99.5% and lithium recovery >90%.
“Pilot testing demonstrated monovalent and divalent removal >99.5% and lithium recovery >90% (Figure 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 4.3 Planned and Ongoing DemonstrationsEnergySource has reported successful completion of pilot testing of its patented ILiAD technology.
“They have reported successful completion of pilot testing of their patented Integrated Lithium Adsorption Desorption (ILiAD) technology, which combines lithiumselective sorbent with continuous bed processing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ 4.3 Planned and Ongoing DemonstrationsThe demonstration facility will be sited at an existing geothermal power plant, with the project managed by BHER Minerals.
“The demonstration facility will be sited at an existing geothermal power plant, with the project managed by BHER Minerals (wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites BHER Minerals 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsBench column experiments with LDH have shown high selectivity for lithium relative to competing ions, and LDH sorbents are low cost and environmentally benign without consuming reagent chemicals or producing secondary waste.
“Bench column experiments with LDH have shown high selectivity for lithium relative to competing ions, and LDH sorbents are low cost and environmentally benign without consuming reagent chemicals or producing secondary waste.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsOther Li-Mn-O and Li-Ti-O chemistries have been explored with positive results.
“Other Li-Mn-O and Li-Ti-O chemistries have been explored with positive results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsLDHs have slightly lower capacity but good selectivity, are relatively inexpensive to regenerate, and are stable through many cycles.
“LDHs have slightly lower capacity but good selectivity, are relatively inexpensive to regenerate, and are stable through many cycles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsThere is no single model to apply to all geothermal brines or even to different brine and power plant operations in the Salton Sea KGRA.
“there is no single model to apply to all geothermal brines or even to different brine and power plant operations in the Salton Sea KGRA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ A.2 SRI InternationalThe treated brine contained 319 mg/L Li, 77,173 mg/L Na, 27,409 mg/L K, 42,831 mg/L Ca, and 694 mg/L Sr.
“the treated brine contained 319 mg/L Li, 77,173 mg/L Na, 27,409 mg/L K, 42,831 mg/L Ca, and 694 mg/L Sr”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ ElectrodialysisChromatography is a proven technology in industrial applications for chemical separations, and researchers at NREL have recently begun investigating application of simulated moving bed chromatography to extraction of lithium and other materials from brines.
“Chromatography is a proven technology in industrial applications for chemical separations, and researchers at NREL have recently begun investigating application of simulated moving bed chromatography to extraction of lithium and other materials from brines (Karp 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Karp 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ ElectrodialysisEstablished commercial solvent extraction expertise is being directed toward advancing the technique's application to lithium extraction from brines.
“Established commercial solvent extraction expertise (e.g., Tenova) is also being directed toward advancing the technique's application to lithium extraction from brines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Additional informationDuring pilot testing at the Elmore and Featherstone power plants, more than 93% of silica and 98% percent of Fe (II) were removed as filter cake.
“During pilot testing at the Elmore and Featherstone power plants, more than 93% of silica and 98% percent of Fe (II) were removed as filter cake.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harrison 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ Additional informationRemoval of 95% of arsenic was achieved by oxidizing 20%-30% of the iron between pH values of 3 and 4 before precipitation of silica-iron filter cake.
“Importantly, removal of 95% of arsenic was achieved by oxidizing 20%-30% of the iron between pH values of 3 and 4 before precipitation of silica-iron filter cake.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harrison 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.1 Project Motivation and GoalsU.S. lithium consumption from 2015 through 2019 is estimated to be 2,000-3,000 mt per year, convertible to nearly 16,000 mt of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE).
“This is significant-U.S. lithium consumption from 2015 through 2019 is estimated to be 2,000-3,000 mt per year, which can be converted to nearly 16,000 mt of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) (Jaskula 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaskula 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.1 Project Motivation and GoalsFrom 2015-2019, U.S. net import reliance as a percentage of estimated consumption was typically >50%, with imports primarily from Argentina (53%), Chile (40%), and China (3%).
“From 2015-2019, net import reliance as a percentage of estimated consumption was typically >50%, with imports primarily coming from Argentina (53%), Chile (40%), and China (3%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaskula 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1.1 Project Motivation and GoalsIn 2018, estimated lithium extraction and processing from evaporation ponds and hardrock leaching made up approximately 46% and 54%, respectively, of the current economically profitable lithium production methods.
“In 2018, estimated lithium extraction and processing from evaporation ponds and hardrock leaching made up approximately 46% and 54%, respectively, of the current economically profitable lithium production methods (Facada 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Facada 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Executive SummaryUse of direct extraction technologies allows for a more sustainable lithium supply relative to current evaporative brine and hardrock mining operations in terms of land use, water use, time to market with lithium products, and carbon intensity of operations.
“Additionally, the use of direct extraction technologies allows for a more sustainable lithium supply relative to current evaporative brine and hardrock mining operations in terms of land use, water use, time to market with lithium products, and carbon intensity of operations.”
- Also stated in: § 2.3 Other Methods of Lithium Extraction · plain
“DLE technologies can be added to existing geothermal power plants or built into the design of future plants and have distinct advantages over evaporative ponds and hardrock mining with respect to sustainability related to land use, water use, time to market with lithium products, and carbon intensity of operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 2.3 Other Methods of Lithium Extraction · plain
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1.1 Project Motivation and GoalsThe latest U.S. Geological Survey's Mineral Commodities Summary estimates that 65% of lithium end use globally is for lithium-ion batteries, and this market is expected to grow rapidly in coming years.
“The latest U.S. Geological Survey's (USGS) Mineral Commodities Summary (Jaskula 2020) estimates that 65% of the lithium end use globally is for lithium-ion batteries, and this market is expected to grow rapidly in coming years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jaskula 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ Executive SummaryMany techniques and process strategies proposed to extract lithium directly from geothermal and other brines can be generally categorized into adsorption, ion exchange, and solvent extraction techniques.
“Many techniques and process strategies have been proposed to extract lithium directly from geothermal and other brines, and these can be generally categorized into adsorption, ion exchange, and solvent extraction techniques.”
- Also stated in: § 2.3 Other Methods of Lithium Extraction · plain
“DLE technologies can be broadly grouped into three main categories: adsorption, ion exchange, and solvent extraction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 2.3 Other Methods of Lithium Extraction · plain
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Executive SummarySince mid-2018, lithium carbonate spot market prices have ranged from approximately $20,000/mt to $7,500/mt and lithium hydroxide monohydrate from $21,000/mt to $10,000/mt.
“For comparison, market prices since mid-2018 have ranged from approximately $20,000/mt to $7,500/mt LCE.”
- Also stated in: § 2 Lithium Extraction Technology · plain
“Since mid-2018, lithium carbonate spot market prices have ranged from approximately $20,000/mt to $7,500/mt and lithium hydroxide monohydrate from $21,000/mt to $10,000/mt (Fastmarkets, 2021) with lowest prices coming during the COVID-19-related, global economic downturn and reduction in demand.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fastmarkets, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 2 Lithium Extraction Technology · plain
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.1 Lithium Occurrence in Geothermal BrinesLess than 1% of geothermal fluid samples from primarily the western United States have lithium concentrations >20 mg/kg, and the highest concentrations are from the Salton Sea, with values up to 400 mg/kg.
“Notably, less than 1% of samples have lithium concentrations >20 mg/kg, and the highest concentrations are from the Salton Sea, with values up to 400 mg/kg.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Neupane and Wendt (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Executive SummaryImproved performance of sorbents and solvents will be primary drivers of future cost reductions and improved economics for lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
“Improved performance of sorbent and solvents will be primary drivers of future cost reductions and improved economics for lithium extraction from geothermal brines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 4.1 Proposed Direct Lithium Extraction ProjectsUltimately, a specific geothermal fluid will require a best-fit lithium extraction process, or combination of processes, based on fluid composition and physical and chemical requirements related to power generation and reservoir management.
“Ultimately, a specific geothermal fluid will require a best-fit lithium extraction process, or combination of processes, based on fluid composition and physical and chemical requirements related to power generation and reservoir management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 4.1 Proposed Direct Lithium Extraction ProjectsSome oilfield and evaporite brine projects have advanced to pilot scale and provide confidence in the technical feasibility of DLE.
“Some of the oilfield and evaporite brine projects have advanced to pilot scale and provide confidence in the technical feasibility of DLE”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Proposed Direct Lithium Extraction ProjectsBench-scale studies of sorbents and Upper Rhine Valley geothermal fluid indicate potential to extract >90% of lithium from brine containing 181 mg/kg lithium.
“bench-scale studies of sorbents and Upper Rhine Valley geothermal fluid indicate the potential to extract >90% of lithium from brine containing 181 mg/kg lithium (Vulcan Energy Resources 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vulcan Energy Resources 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.3 DOE Support of Lithium Extraction from Geothermal BrinesRenew and Hansen (2017) performed a techno-economic analysis that suggested their lithium extraction process would not be economically viable, particularly with respect to Li concentration (150 mg/L) and Li2CO3 ($20,000/mt) price sensitivity used in their study.
“Renew and Hansen (2017) performed a techno-economic analysis that suggested the process would not be economically viable, particularly with respect to Li concentration (150 mg/L) and Li2CO3 ($20,000/mt) price sensitivity used in their study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Renew and Hansen (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.2 Overview of Minerals Extraction from Geothermal BrinesOptimal lithium recovery parameters will vary based on the specific physical and chemical properties of target geothermal fluids.
“An important lesson for lithium extraction was noted by the authors-optimal lithium recovery parameters will vary based on the specific physical and chemical properties of target geothermal fluids.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berthold and Baker (1976)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.3 DOE Support of Lithium Extraction from Geothermal BrinesHigher lithium concentrations (300 mg/L), higher Li2CO3 prices ($28,000/mt), or reduced capital costs (-27%) potentially could support project economics for the Renew and Hansen process.
“Higher concentrations (300 mg/L), higher prices ($28,000/mt), or reduced capital costs (-27%) potentially could support project economics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Renew and Hansen (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Premisecitation§ 3.2 Overview of Minerals Extraction from Geothermal BrinesOptimal lithium recovery (>98%) from post-flash Salton Sea brine was achieved with Al/Li ratios of 3/1, pH 7.5, and temperature 75°-85°C.
“Optimal lithium recovery (>98%) was achieved with Al/Li ratios of 3/1, pH 7.5, and temperature 75°-85°C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berthold and Baker (1976)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.2 Overview of Minerals Extraction from Geothermal BrinesSchultze and Bauer (1984) described one of the earliest processes considered economic for recovery of lithium from geothermal brines at the Salton Sea, with recovery of 99% of lithium as LiCl.
“Schultze and Bauer (1984) described one of the earliest processes considered economic for recovery of lithium from geothermal brines at the Salton Sea, with recovery of 99% of lithium as LiCl (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schultze and Bauer (1984)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Marston and Garska (2019)The tail fluid will be cooler than the normal injection stream, and this could potentially affect reservoir temperatures if large volumes of cooled, post-lithium-extraction fluid are injected for many years.
“The tail fluid will be cooler than the normal injection stream, and this could potentially affect reservoir temperatures if large volumes of cooled, post-lithium-extraction fluid are injected for many years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal BrinesA projected Li2CO3 price of $12,000/mt suggests a cost near $4,000/mt LCE for planned production of 16,500 mt LCE per year.
“projected Li2CO3 price of $12,000/mt, suggests a cost near $4,000/mt LCE for planned production of 16,500 mt LCE per year (EnergySource 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EnergySource 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Some of the DLE projects (Table 3; Appendix A) report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).Power generation processes can benefit lithium extraction with the potential to provide power, heat, and water for downstream operations.
“Power generation processes can benefit lithium extraction with the potential to provide power, heat, and water for downstream operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal BrinesThe primary differences between non-geothermal brine processes and those applied to geothermal brine at the Salton Sea are required pre-processing to manage silica, iron and other metals and, if required, post-processing to ensure appropriate physical and chemical properties of injected tail brine.
“Generally, the primary differences between non-geothermal brine processes and those applied to geothermal brine at the Salton Sea are required pre-processing to manage silica, iron and other metals and, if required, post-processing to ensure appropriate physical and chemical properties of injected tail brine”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Some of the DLE projects (Table 3; Appendix A) report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).Geothermal brines have unique brine pre-treatments required for power generation, and the power generation process influences the physical and chemical properties of injection fluid that is the source brine for lithium extraction.
“Geothermal brines also have unique brine pre-treatments required for power generation, and the power generation process influences the physical and chemical properties of injection fluid that is the source brine for lithium extraction operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ Some of the DLE projects (Table 3; Appendix A) report detailed operating expenses (OPEX).Each project has unique physical, chemical, and economic requirements that help determine the optimized DLE process.
“Each project has unique physical, chemical, and economic requirements that help determine the optimized DLE process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal BrinesLithium extraction benefits from crystallizer and clarifier processes to remove silica and iron as pre-treatment for the power generation process.
“Lithium extraction benefits from crystallizer and clarifier processes to remove silica and iron as pre-treatment for the power generation process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.2 DLE from Salton Sea Geothermal BrinesOther processes commercialized at the Salton Sea will vary in design but share many of the same process steps and likely have costs near $4,000/mt LCE.
“Though other processes that might be commercialized at the Salton Sea will vary in design (e.g., BHER Minerals 2020), they will share many of the same process steps and likely have costs near $4,000/mt LCE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites BHER Minerals 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsLi2TiO3 is the precursor for hydrated titanium oxide (H2TiO3) sorbent, which has high lithium capacity and selectivity, despite studies documenting some co-adsorbed sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium at non-negligible levels.
“Li2TiO3) is the precursor for hydrated titanium oxide (H2TiO3) sorbent, which has high lithium capacity and selectivity, despite studies that document some co-adsorbed sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium at non-negligible levels (Chitrakar et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chitrakar et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.3 Planned and Ongoing DemonstrationsEnergySource is planning to build a lithium extraction facility at its Featherstone power plant, with construction starting in 2021 and operations beginning in 2023.
“EnergySource is planning to build a lithium extraction facility at their Featherstone power plant, with construction starting in 2021 and operations beginning in 2023 (EnergySource 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EnergySource 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsRobust modeling of lithium extraction from geothermal brines requires explicit process details, many of which are proprietary.
“robust modeling of lithium extraction from geothermal brines requires explicit process details, many of which are proprietary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsStringfellow and Dobson (2021) note that large-scale, expensive demonstration projects are necessary to advance lithium extraction from geothermal brines toward commercialization.
“They also note that large-scale, expensive demonstration projects are necessary to advance lithium extraction from geothermal brines toward commercialization”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stringfellow and Dobson (2021)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsThese prices are within the range of spot market prices since mid-2018.
“These prices are within the range of spot market prices since mid-2018”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsStringfellow and Dobson (2021) report that lithium extraction with inorganic molecular sieve ion-exchange sorbents is the most developed technology and note that sorbent selectivity, sorbent tolerance for interfering ions, and purity of extracted lithium are the main cost drivers.
“Stringfellow and Dobson (2021) report that lithium extraction with inorganic molecular sieve ion-exchange sorbents is the most developed technology and note that sorbent selectivity, sorbent tolerance for interfering ions, and purity of extracted lithium are the main cost drivers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stringfellow and Dobson (2021)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsParanthanam et al. (2017) reported that further improvements can be made in the quality of sorbent materials related to recovery efficiency, lithium capacity, selectivity relative to other competing bulk ions, and stability.
“Paranthanam et al. (2017) reported that further improvements can be made in the quality of sorbent materials related to recovery efficiency, lithium capacity, selectivity relative to other competing bulk ions, and stability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Paranthanam et al. (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsIncreased lithium demand is expected in the future.
“increased lithium demand is expected in the future (Chao 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chao 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.4 Future ConsiderationsThe most recent review of lithium extraction techniques is by Stringfellow and Dobson (2021), which provides descriptions and extensive documentation of methods being investigated by researchers.
“The most recent review of lithium extraction techniques is by Stringfellow and Dobson (2021), which provides descriptions and extensive documentation of methods being investigated by researchers (Table 8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stringfellow and Dobson (2021)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ ElectrodialysisThe application of ionic liquids for solvent extraction shows promise for developing high-lithium-affinity and highly efficient extraction processes.
“The application of ionic liquids for solvent extraction shows promise for developing highlithium-affinity and highly efficient extraction processes (Yang et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al. 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ ElectrodialysisBecause of the high concentration of lithium, Salton Sea geothermal brines are an obvious target for DLE.
“Because of the high concentration of lithium, Salton Sea geothermal brines are an obvious target for DLE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ ElectrodialysisThe need for DLE process power and water is mitigated by the availability of on-site geothermal power, heat, and water, giving geothermal sites a potential advantage over other DLE brine targets.
“Need for DLE process power and water is mitigated by the availability of on-site geothermal power, heat, and water (RO-processed condensate).This gives geothermal sites a potential advantage over other DLE brine targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ElectrodialysisIn addition to lithium, other valuable minerals could potentially be extracted from geothermal brines.
“In addition to lithium, other valuable minerals could potentially be extracted from geothermal brines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ElectrodialysisStoichiometries of chemical reactions and combinations of reactions guide the application of DLE in terms of reagent and materials costs.
“Stoichiometries of chemical reactions and combinations of reactions guide the application of DLE in terms of reagent and materials costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ ElectrodialysisIf inexpensive and sustainable chemistries can be developed, solvent extraction may be particularly suitable for geothermal brines with modest lithium concentrations.
“If inexpensive and sustainable chemistries can be developed, solvent extraction may be particularly suitable for geothermal brines with modest lithium concentrations (e.g., most brines outside the Salton Sea).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ ElectrodialysisLithium extraction from Salton Sea brines will benefit from cost reductions associated with increased sorbent selectivity for lithium with respect to competing ions and from decreased pre-treatment requirements.
“Lithium extraction from Salton Sea brines will benefit from cost reductions associated with increased sorbent selectivity for lithium with respect to competing ions such as sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium and from decreased pre-treatment requirements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoning§ A.2 SRI InternationalAn alternative to HCl for sorbent regeneration is important in order to minimize deleterious effects on the hydrated manganese oxide caused by Mn solubility in HCl.
“An alternative to HCl for sorbent regeneration was deemed important to minimize deleterious effects on the hydrated manganese oxide due to Mn solubility in HCl.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ElectrodialysisFracture controlled permeability and hydrothermal alteration potentially limit injectate's contact with lithium-rich rocks.
“Fracture controlled permeability and hydrothermal alteration potentially limit injectate's contact with lithium-rich rocks (e.g., silicified selvages to permeable fractures).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ ElectrodialysisDiversity of fluid physical and chemical properties and variations in operational conditions require lithium extraction processes to be uniquely tailored to the target geothermal reservoir and power plant.
“Diversity of fluid physical and chemical properties and variations in operational conditions (e.g., plant rejection temperature) require lithium extraction processes to be uniquely tailored to the target geothermal reservoir and power plant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Additional informationAnson Resources Paradox Basin project is located in Utah and consists of three phases of development.
“Anson Resources Paradox Basin project is located in Utah and consists of three phases of development (Anson Resources 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anson Resources 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A.9 Lake ResourcesIn Alsace, France, geothermal fluids have measured temperatures up to 205°C and lithium concentrations up to 162 mg/L.
“In Alsace, France, geothermal fluids have measured temperatures up to 205°C and lithium concentrations up to 162 mg/L(Sanjuan et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sanjuan et al. 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A.4 Vulcan Energy ResourcesUpper Rhine Valley brines most amenable to lithium extraction have chemistries of approximately 150-200 mg/kg lithium, 30,000 mg/kg sodium, 2,000 mg/kg potassium, 6,000 mg/kg calcium, and 400 mg/kg magnesium, from reservoirs measured up to 200°C with geothermometry indicating 225°C.
“Upper Rhine Valley brines most amenable to lithium extraction have chemistries approximately 150-200 mg/kg lithium, 30,000 mg/kg sodium, 2,000 mg/kg potassium, 6,000 mg/kg calcium, and 400 mg/kg magnesium from reservoirs measured up to 200°C and with geothermometry indicating 225°C (Sanjuan et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sanjuan et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ A.6 E3 Metals CorpPure Energy Minerals' Clayton Valley project brines contain up to 221 mg/L lithium and comprise a resource of 247,000 mt of lithium hydroxide monohydrate in saturated basin sediments from ~150-1,000 m below surface.
“Pure Energy Minerals Clayton Valley project is in Nevada where they plan to produce 11,500 mt per year of lithium hydroxide monohydrate (LiOH•H2O; LHM) from brines containing up to 221 mg/L lithium that comprise a resource of 247,000 mt of LHM in saturated basin sediments from ~150-1,000 m below surface.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ A.9 Lake ResourcesThe tail brine contains an average lithium concentration of 168 mg/L, and the brine resource contains 3,140,000 mt LCE.
“The tail brine contains an average lithium concentration of 168 mg/L, and the brine resource contains 3,140,000 mt LCE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Additional informationThe bromine-lithium brine is hosted in sedimentary units ~1,900 m below surface that are intersected by historic hydrocarbon wells.
“The bromine-lithium brine is hosted in sedimentary units ~1,900 m below surface that are intersected by historic hydrocarbon wells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anson Resources 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ A.9 Lake ResourcesLake Resources' Kachi project salar brine indicated resource comprises 1 million tons LCE with a concentration of 250 mg/L lithium contained in saturated sediments that extend to 880 m below surface.
“The salar brine indicated resource comprises 1 million tons LCE with a concentration of 250 mg/L lithium contained in saturated sediments that extend to 880 m below surface.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Additional informationThe information about Anson Resources' proposed lithium extraction process and estimates of costs remain valid, separate from the issue of overall project viability.
“Despite that, the information about the proposed lithium extraction process and estimates of costs remain valid, separate from the issue of overall project viability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The PEA for Anson Resources' Phase 3 was retracted soon after it was released because of its significant reliance on inferred resources.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ A.6 E3 Metals CorpTenova's novel extraction process for the Clayton Valley project was confirmed with a mini-pilot test using a synthetic brine matched to the physical and chemical properties of naturally occurring Clayton Valley brines.
“Tenova has developed a novel extraction process that was confirmed with a mini-pilot test using a synthetic brine to match the physical and chemical properties of naturally occurring Clayton Valley brines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A.9 Lake ResourcesUpper Rhine Valley geothermal fluids have measured temperatures up to 200°C and lithium concentrations up to 210 mg/L.
“Upper Rhine Valley geothermal fluids have measured temperatures up to 200°C and lithium concentrations up to 210 mg/L(Sanjuan et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sanjuan et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A.9 Lake ResourcesStandard Lithium began testing a lithium extraction demonstration plant in late 2020 using the tail brine from Lanxess bromine extraction operations in Arkansas, and they plan to scale up to a 20,900 mt/yr commercial operation.
“Standard Lithium began testing a lithium extraction demonstration plant in late 2020 using the tail brine from Lanxess bromine extraction operations in Arkansas, and they plan to scale up to a 20,900 mt/yr commercial operation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Standard Lithium (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ A.4 Vulcan Energy ResourcesIn late 2020 Standard Lithium produced concentrated LiCl solution from their demonstration plant in Arkansas, processing 50 gpm of brine from the Lanxess South Plant.
“In late 2020, Standard Lithium announced that they had successfully produced concentrated LiCl solution from their demonstration plant in Arkansas operating under optimized and refined processes summarized above and processing 50 gpm of brine from the Lanxess South Plant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A.9 Lake ResourcesExtraction from less lithium-rich brines has also been studied at Wairakei, New Zealand, where lithium concentrations are only ~13 mg/L.
“Extraction from less lithium-rich brines has also been studied at Wairakei, New Zealand, where lithium concentrations are only ~13 mg/L(Mroczek et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mroczek et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ A.6 E3 Metals CorpE3 Metals' oilfield brine of the Leduc Formation in Alberta, Canada has an average lithium concentration of 74.6 mg/L with a resource estimated at 2.2 million mt LCE.
“The average lithium concentration is 74.6 mg/L with a resource estimated at 2.2 million mt LCE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A.9 Lake ResourcesOther processes that might be commercialized at the Salton Sea will vary in design but will share many of the same process steps and likely have costs near $4,000/mt LCE.
“Though other processes that might be commercialized at the Salton Sea will vary in design (e.g., BHER Minerals 2020), they will share many of the same process steps and likely have costs near $4,000/mt LCE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites BHER Minerals 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Additional informationThe purified brine, containing mostly Li + , K + and Na + cations, is suitable for electrolysis and crystallization to form LiOH•H2O, while water removed from the brine prior to electrolysis can be used as make-up water for lithium processing.
“The purified brine, containing mostly Li + , K + and Na + cations, is suitable for electrolysis and crystallization to form LiOH•H2O, while water removed from the brine prior to electrolysis can be used as make-up water for lithium processing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites E3 Metals Corp. (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Additional informationSilica removal via sorbents was problematic due to required large volumes of stripping solution and degradation of the sorbents.
“Silica removal via sorbents was problematic due to required large volumes of stripping solution and degradation of the sorbents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harrison 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Additional informationThe brine is estimated to contain 192,000 mt LCE with lithium concentrations up to 253 mg/L.
“The brine is estimated to contain 192,000 mt LCE with lithium concentrations up to 253 mg/L.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anson Resources 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Additional informationThe sorbent chosen for development to commercial scale exhibited high capacity, low affinity for impurities, and production via a simple two-step process.
“The sorbent chosen for development to commercial scale exhibited high capacity, low affinity for impurities, and production via a simple two-step process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harrison 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Additional informationThe main process steps for lithium extraction were demonstrated at pilot scale: silica management, lithium extraction, purification, concentration, and conversion into lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate products.
“The main process steps for lithium extraction were demonstrated at pilot scale: (1) silica management; ( 2) lithium extraction; (3) purification; (4) concentration; and (5) conversion into lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate products.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harrison 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Additional informationSimbol focused on the recovery of lithium manganese, zinc, and potassium from pre-injection brines at the Elmore (CalEnergy) and Featherstone (EnergySource) power plants.
“Simbol focused on the recovery of lithium manganese, zinc, and potassium from pre-injection brines at the Elmore (CalEnergy) and Featherstone (EnergySource) power plants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harrison 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Additional informationOf the two novel processes, silica removal via sorbent was deemed less costly and potentially economical for polishing solutions with low silica concentrations.
“Of the two novel processes, silica removal via sorbent was deemed less costly and potentially economical for polishing solutions with low silica concentrations (Harrison 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harrison 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Additional informationSilica removal using precipitants was problematic due to required large caustic volumes to maintain pH at optimal levels and, for some precipitants, lithium was also extracted.
“Silica removal using precipitants was problematic due to required large caustic volumes to maintain pH at optimal levels and, for some precipitants, lithium was also extracted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harrison 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Additional informationThe electrolysis process forms a weak sulfuric acid stream, which is recycled to the elution stage, reducing the need for purchase of large quantities of reagent.
“The electrolysis process forms a weak sulfuric acid stream, which is recycled to the elution stage, reducing the need for purchase of large quantities of reagent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites E3 Metals Corp. (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Cost data from DLE projects using geothermal, salar, oilfield, and evaporite brines are informative for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
“These projects are focused on geothermal, salar, oilfield, and evaporite brines, all of which are informative for estimating costs of lithium extraction from geothermal brines.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The reported OPEX and IRR from public company reports are accurate and representative of commercial-scale lithium extraction from geothermal brines.
“In the present study, we are mainly limited to understanding techniques and costs made publicly available by companies with projects advanced to stages of development and investment that require formal reporting to stock exchanges in Canada and Australia.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Conversion of hardrock mining concentrate to battery-grade lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide costs $2,000-2,500/mt of mined concentrate depending on lithium concentration and bulk chemistry.
“Conversion to these battery-grade forms can cost $2,000-2,500/mt of mined concentrate depending on the lithium concentration and bulk chemistry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Simbol Phase 3 cost estimates remain valid despite retraction owing to large inferred resources.
“Phase 3 estimates were retracted owing to large inferred resources, but cost estimates remain valid.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Materials and infrastructure are already in place at Salton Sea geothermal power plants if scale inhibition processes are required.
“Materials and infrastructure are already in place at Salton Sea geothermal power plants if scale inhibition processes are required.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The projected Li2CO3 price is $12,000/mt.
“projected Li2CO3 price of $12,000/mt”
The paper relies on this without support.
The PEA for Anson Resources' Phase 3 was retracted soon after it was released because of its significant reliance on inferred resources.
“The PEA for Phase 3 was retracted soon after it was released because of its significant reliance on inferred resources.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Detailed information on the technology used at each site is essential, ideally at a process level.
“Detailed information on the technology used at each site is essential, ideally at a process level.15,22,23,32,42−50,52−54,56−74”
From Current and Future Impacts of Lithium Carbonate from Brines: A Global Regionalized Life Cycle Assessment Model (2025) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Lake Resources labor cost per ton does not match annual cost
MinorLake Resources plans to produce 25,500 mt per year. Its reported annual labor cost of $10,900,000 therefore equals about $427 per ton, not the listed $394 per ton.
Reported 394 · recomputed 427.45098
“Description Cost per year Cost per metric ton LCE Labor 10,900,000 $ 394 $”
Lake Resources utility cost per ton does not match annual cost
MinorAt the stated production rate of 25,500 mt per year, the $42,100,000 annual utility cost equals about $1,651 per ton, not $1,677.
Reported 1677 · recomputed 1650.980392
“Utilities (electric, gas, water) 42,100,000 $ 1,677 $”
A positive return is reported at-not above-$11,000 per ton
MinorThe text says positive returns occur at modeled lithium carbonate prices above $11,000 per ton, but Table 3 reports a 25% pre-tax IRR for Lake Resources at exactly $11,000 per ton.
“positive Internal Rate of Return (IRR) suggests that the projects reviewed are economically feasible at modeled prices >$11,000/mt Li2CO3 and >$12,267/mt LiOH•H2O”
“| Modeled product price ($/mt) | 12,000 | 14,925 | 13,550 | 15,160 | 13,000 | 12,267 | 11,000 | | Pre-tax IRR (%) | 268 | 31 | 41.8 | 32 | 106 | 24 | 25 |”
Cites
Flexer, V., Baspineiro, C. F., & Galli, C. I. (2018) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.223 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Hou, J., Hu, Y., Wang, P., Ou, R., Jiang, L., Liu, J. Z., Freeman, B. D., Hill, A. J., & Wang, H. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaq0066 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Materials for lithium recovery from salt-lake brine
Xu, P., Hong, J., Qian, X., Xu, Z., Xia, H., Tao, X., Xu, Z., & Ni, Q.-Q. (2021) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-020-05019-1 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Review on the Electrochemical Extraction of Lithium from Seawater/Brine
Zhao, X., Yang, H., Wang, Y., & Sha, Z. (2019) · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113389 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Fortier, S. M., Nassar, N. T., Lederer, G. W., Brainard, J., Gambogi, J., & McCullough, E. A. (2018) · Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World · doi:10.3133/ofr20181021 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
WILLIAMS, A. E., & McKibben, M. A. (1989) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90312-8 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Zukin, J. G., Hammond, D. E., Ku, T., & Elders, W. A. (1987) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(87)90152-9 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Recovery of lithium from alkaline brine by solvent extraction with functionalized ionic liquid
Yang, S., Liu, G., Wang, J., Cui, L., & Chen, Y. (2019) · Fluid Phase Equilibria · doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2019.04.015 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Maimoni, A. (1982) · Geothermics · doi:10.1016/0375-6505(82)90031-1 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Lithium Extraction from Wairakei Geothermal Fluid using Electrodialysis
Mroczek, E., Dedual, G., Graham, D., & Bacon, L. (2015) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Sanjuan, B., Negrel, G., Lous, M. L., Poulmarch, E., Gal, F., & Damy, P.-C. (2020) · HAL · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Schultze, L. E., & Bauer, D. (1982) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
SImbol Materials Lithium Extraction Operating Data From Elmore and Featherstone Geothermal Plants
Harrison, S. (2015) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.15121/1196287
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Chitrakar, R., Y. Makita, K. Ooi, and A. Sonoda. 2014. "Lithium recovery from salt lake brine by H2TiO3." Dalton Transactions 43, no. 23: 8933-8939.
- Clutter, T. J. 2000. "Mining Economic Benefits from Geothermal Brine." Quarterly Bulletin 21, no. 2: 1-3.
- Grant, A. 2020. "Disruption or Evolution?" Benchmark Q1 Review 2020: Lithium Extraction: 46-52.
- Kennedy, A.M. 1961. "The recovery of lithium and other metals from geothermal water at Wairakei." Proceedings of United Nations Conference on New Sources of Energy, Conf. 35/ G/56: 502-511.
- Ling, L., V. G. Deshmane, M. P. Paranthaman, R. Bhave, B. A. Moyer, and S. Harrison. 2018. "Lithium Recovery from Aqueous Resources and Batteries: A Brief Review." Johnson Matthey Technology Review 62, no. 2: 161-176.
- Liu, G., Z. Zhao, and A. Ghahreman. 2019. "Novel approaches for lithium extraction from salt- lake brines: A review." Hydrometallurgy 187: 81-100.
- Neupane, G., and D.S. Wendt. 2017. "Assessment of Mineral Resources in Geothermal Brines in the US." 42nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford University.
- Palmer, T.D. 1975 "Characteristics of geothermal wells located in the Salton Sea geothermal field, Imperial County, California." Lawrence Livermore Laboratory UCRL-51976. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/7356054
- Renew, J., and T. Hansen. 2017. "Geothermal thermoelectric generation (G-TEG) with integrated temperature driven membrane distillation and novel manganese oxide for lithium extraction." United States. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1360976
- Simmons, S.F., S. Kirby, P. Verplanck, and K. Kelley. 2018. "Strategic and Critical Elements in Produced Geothermal Fluids from Nevada and Utah." 43 rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University.
- Stringfellow, W.T., and P. F. Dobson. 2021. "Technology for Lithium Extraction in the Context of Hybrid Geothermal Power." 46 th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University.
- Ventura, S., S. Bhamidi, and M. Hornbostel. 2018. "Selective recovery of lithium from brines." 43 rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Technology for the Recovery of Lithium from Geothermal Brines
Stringfellow, W. T., & Dobson, P. F. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14206805 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Prospects of metal recovery from wastewater and brine
DuChanois, R. M., Cooper, N. J., Lee, B., Patel, S. K., Mazurowski, L., Graedel, T. E., & Elimelech, M. (2023) · Nature Water · doi:10.1038/s44221-022-00006-z · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Balaram, V., Santosh, M., Satyanarayanan, M., Srinivas, N., & Gupta, H. (2024) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101868 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Metal-based adsorbents for lithium recovery from aqueous resources
Yu, H., Naidu, G., Zhang, C., Wang, C., Razmjou, A., Han, D. S., He, T., & Shon, H. K. (2022) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2022.115951 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Nikkhah, H., Ipekçi, D., Xiang, W., Stoll, Z., Xu, P., Li, B., McCutcheon, J. R., & Beykal, B. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.155349 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Lithium in the Green energy transition: the quest for both sustainability and security
Graham, J. D., Rupp, J. A., & Brungard, E. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132011274 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Mends, E. A., & Chu, P. (2023) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2023.110710 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Hu, H., Guo, X., Yang, L., Wu, Y., Yang, G., & Luo, X. (2025) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202506055 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Reich, R., Slunitschek, K., Danisi, R. M., Eiche, E., & Kolb, J. (2023) · Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review · doi:10.1080/08827508.2022.2047041 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Yan, G., Wang, M., Hill, G. T., Zou, S., & Liu, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2200751119 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Boroumand, Y., & Razmjou, A. (2024) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2024.117406 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Advancing ion-exchange membranes to ion-selective membranes: principles, status, and opportunities
Fan, H., Huang, Y., & Yip, N. Y. (2022) · Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11783-023-1625-0 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Mojid, M. R., Lee, K. J., & You, J. (2024) · Sustainable materials and technologies · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e00923 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Electrochemical Wastewater Refining: A Vision for Circular Chemical Manufacturing
Miller, D. M., Abels, K., Guo, J., Williams, K. S., Liu, M. J., & Tarpeh, W. A. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.3c01142 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Review of recent advances in lithium extraction from subsurface brines
Disu, B., Rafati, R., Haddad, A. S., Mendoza‐Roca, J. A., Iborra–Clar, M. I., & Bakhtiari, S. S. E. (2024) · Geoenergy Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213189 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Lithium resources and novel strategies for their extraction and purification
Wu, F., Shivakumar, K. R., Konhauser, K. O., & Alessi, D. S. (2025) · npj Materials Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s44296-025-00069-5 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Recovery of Lithium from Oilfield Brines—Current Achievements and Future Perspectives: A Mini Review
Knapik, E., Rotko, G., & Marszałek, M. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16186628 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Utilisation of adsorption as a resource recovery technique for lithium in geothermal water
Ighalo, J. O., Amaku, J. F., Olisah, C., Adeola, A. O., Iwuozor, K. O., Akpomie, K. G., Conradie, J., Adegoke, K. A., & Oyedotun, K. O. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2022.120107 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Kölbel, T., Kölbel, T., Herrmann, L., Kaymakci, E., Ghergut, I., Poirel, A., & Schneider, J. (2023) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2023.106131 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
2021 U.S. Geothermal Power Production and District Heating Market Report
Robins, J., Kolker, A., Flores-Espino, F., Pettitt, W. S., Schmidt, B., Beckers, K. F., Pauling, H., & Anderson, B. (2021) · doi:10.2172/1808679 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Electro-Driven Materials and Processes for Lithium Recovery—A Review
Siekierka, A., Bryjak, M., Razmjou, A., Kujawski, W. M., Nikoloski, A. N., & Dumée, L. F. (2022) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes12030343 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Schenker, V., & Pfister, S. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.4c12619 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Is lithium from geothermal brines the sustainable solution for Li-ion batteries?
Schenker, V., Bayer, P., Oberschelp, C., & Pfister, S. (2024) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114456 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Sustainable lithium extraction from liquid ores using membrane-based technologies: a review
Kumar, R., Choi, K.-W., Khan, M. A., Biswas, G. G., Cho, S., Chakrabortty, S., Tripathy, S. K., Kim, K., & Jeon, B. (2025) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-025-01871-2 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Produced Water Treatment and Valorization: A Techno-Economical Review
Sanchez-Rosario, R., & Hildenbrand, Z. L. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15134619 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Zegeye, R. B., Tufa, R. A., Santoro, S., Inzillo, B. M., Aquino, M., Politano, G. G., Embaye, A. S., Argurio, P., Bartolo, L. D., & Curcio, E. (2025) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d4gc06530a · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Parker, S. S., Clifford, M. J., & Cohen, B. S. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168639 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Ettehadi, A., Chuprin, M., Mokhtari, M., Gang, D. D., Wortman, P. B., & Heydari, E. (2024) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00732 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Comprehensive review of lithium extraction processes with economic and environmental analysis
Abrishami, S., Gonbadi, M., Boroumand, Y., Golmohammadi, M., Narimani, M., Sarmadi, A., Matthews, C., Estay, H., Khiadani, M., & Razmjou, A. (2025) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2025.135582 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Slattery, M., Kendall, A. M., Helal, N., & Whittaker, M. (2023) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103043 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Characterizing the Geothermal Lithium Resource at the Salton Sea
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), B., Dobson, P., USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), R. P. O. G. T. O., Araya, N., Brounce, M., Busse, M., Camarillo, M., English, L., Humphreys, J., Kalderon-Asael, B., et al. (2023) · doi:10.2172/2222403 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
A review of Geological Thermal Energy Storage for seasonal, grid-scale dispatching
Witter, E., Dobson, P. F., Akindipe, D., McTigue, J. D., Atkinson, T., Kumar, R., Sonnenthal, E., & Zhu, G. (2025) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115761 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Li, D., Zhang, N., Gao, D., Zhuang, Z., & Zeng, D. (2023) · ACS Materials Au · doi:10.1021/acsmaterialsau.3c00063 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Khatoon, R., Raksasat, R., Ho, Y., Lim, J. W., Jumbri, K., Ho, C., Chan, Y. J., Abdelfattah, E. A., & Khoo, K. S. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su152216016 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Sustainable process design for lithium recovery from geothermal brines using chemical precipitation
Nikkhah, H., Maria, A. D., Granata, G., & Beykal, B. (2024) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107980 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Chen, F., Ma, Z., Nasrabadi, H., Chen, B., Mehana, M. Z., & van Wijk, J. W. (2023) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c04000 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Wang, R., Sheng, M., Liu, X., Wang, Q., Wang, Z., & Wang, L. A. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c13571 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Das, J., Young, M. H., Gülen, G., Harner, Z. Q., & Singh, S. (2025) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2025.05.075 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Whittaker, M., Dong, W., Li, K., Aytuğ, T., Evans, S. F., Meyer, H. M., Moyer, B. A., & Paranthaman, M. P. (2023) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c00072 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Disu, B., Rafati, R., Haddad, A. S., & Muirhead, D. (2025) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00735 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Berry, C. (2023) · Archimedes · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25577-9_6 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The Effect of Silicate Ions on the Separation of Lithium From Geothermal Fluid
Lee, J., & Chung, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.3389/fceng.2022.741281 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Chen, L., Li, C., Adibnia, S., Yang, S., Li, J., Samoľová, E., Dopilka, A., Huang, Z., Giovine, R. A., Fleming, X. B., et al. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adz7696 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Kölbel, T., Slunitschek, K., Kaymakci, E., Kölbel, T., Reich, R., & Schneider, J. (2024) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2024.106266 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Geothermal Lithium Extraction Technology: Research Status and Prospects
Zhang, B., Wang, F., Wang, R., Shang, Y., Li, F., Li, M., & Wang, T. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en18123146 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Balaram, V., & Santosh, M. (2025) · Gondwana Research · doi:10.1016/j.gr.2025.07.001 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Lee, J., Mangiri, R., Jang, G., Jbari, O., Lee, Y., & Chung, E. (2025) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2025.119498 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Liu, X., Hao, Z., Liu, T., Zhao, Q., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., & Chu, H. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2525797123 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Insufficient Lithium Supply is Likely to Slow Down the Transition to Electrified TransportPreprint
McNeil, B., Billy, R. G., Lopez, F. A., Petavratzi, E., & Müller, D. B. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4662605 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Membranes for Lithium Recovery From Conventional and Unconventional Sources
Sreedhar, N., Lee, R., Appukuttan, S. N., Sitaraman, H., DesVeaux, J. S., Grim, R. G., Paul, M., Kumar, M., & Roy, A. (2026) · ACS ES&T Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsestengg.5c00997 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Geothermal power generation potential in the United States by 2050
Chen, C., Merino-García, D., Lines, T., & Cohan, D. S. (2024) · Environmental Research Energy · doi:10.1088/2753-3751/ad3fbb · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hu, H., Yang, G., Chen, C., Guo, X., Xie, Y., Hou, D., Li, X., Fan, W., Yang, L., & Luo, X. (2025) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202513012 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Valorization of lithium hardrock concentrates into battery raw materials and commodity products
Mowbray, B. A. W., Hunt, C., Fuelling, K. M., Prawira, J., Jafari, K., Strong, N., & Chiang, Y. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aec4652 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Barajas-Villarruel, L. R., Flores-Guerrero, W. G., Rico-Ramı́rez, V., & Castrejón‐González, E. O. (2024) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2024.09.028 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Lithium extraction from Dieng geothermal brine using solvent extraction – A preliminary study
Wahyudi, A. H., Septiarani, A., Hairunnisa, & Rodliyah, I. (2023) · Indonesian Mining Journal · doi:10.30556/imj.vol26.no1.2023.1477 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kölbel, L., Herrmann, L., Kölbel, T., & Schneider, J. (2024) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.105913 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Economic Analysis of Lithium and Salts Recoveries from Bakken Formation
Jakaria, M., Ling, K., Wang, D., Crowell, J., & Zheng, D. (2025) · SPE Journal · doi:10.2118/220910-pa · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Saasi, A. T., Colosi, L. M., Geise, G. M., & Koenig, G. M. (2025) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2025.134692 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Mousavinezhad, S., Sharifian, S., Nikfar, S., & Vahidi, E. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c09948 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flue gas induced lithium carbonate crystallization from industrial black mass
Joshi, B., Ucar, S., Knuutila, H. K., Svendsen, H. F., Andreassen, J., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2025) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139423 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Assessment of critical mineral extraction from brines at Mount Meager, Southwestern BC, Canada
Ghalati, F. H., Motazedian, D., Craven, J., Grasby, S., & Tschirhart, V. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-01044-9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mineral Recovery from Geothermal Brines
McKibben, M. A., & Stringfellow, W. T. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-24750-7.00029-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Tiam, A., Bechara, E., Watson, M., & Poda, S. (2026) · Water · doi:10.3390/w18060739 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A novel zwitterionic chromatography approach to separate lithium from unconventional resources
Choi, H., Jennewein, C., Moss, M. R., Chirban, L. A., Kolbe, E., Li, D., Condarcure, M., Prestangen, R. R., Owczarczyk, Z. R., Bu, L., et al. (2025) · Sustainable materials and technologies · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01339 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Progress in Resource Evaluation Using a Handheld Raman Instrument Developed for Astronaut Missions
Armstrong, J., McHugh, M., Parnell, J., Lerman, H. N., Moral, A., & Hutchinson, I. B. (2025) · Journal of Raman Spectroscopy · doi:10.1002/jrs.70060 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Danso, D. K., Bicerano, J., Heller, D. P., & Barati, R. (2024) · SPE Energy Transition Symposium · doi:10.2118/221397-ms · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Digging Deep – Governing subsurface uses for the German energy transition
Biehl, J., Köppel, J., Neugebauer, J., & Geißler, G. (2025) · Cleaner Production Letters · doi:10.1016/j.clpl.2025.100099 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Masouleh, S. S. M., Sanz, C. A., Jansonius, R. P., Cronin, C., Hein, J. E., & Hattrick-Simpers, J. R. (2025) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d5dd00285k · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Huang, X., Neil, C. W., Ahmmed, B., Mehana, M. Z., Bhattacharya, S., Nicot, J., & Elliott, B. A. (2026) · Energy Conversion and Management X · doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101671 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Esmaeilpour, M., Nitschke, F., & Köhl, T. (2023) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2023.109068 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Economic Analysis of Lithium and Salts Recoveries from Bakken Formation
Jakaria, M., Ling, K., Wang, D., Crowell, J., & Zheng, D. (2024) · SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · doi:10.2118/220910-ms · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Raw Material Potential of Geothermal Systems in Chile
Pérez, I., Goldberg, V., Nitschke, F., Morata, D., Koschikowski, J., & Köhl, T. (2024) · Green energy and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73576-9_19 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Т.В., Ч. (2023) · Издательство "Спутник +" eBooks · doi:10.25633/6703-9
Strategic Elements in Holocene Sediments of the Tinto River Estuary (SW Spain)
Romero, V., Muñoz, F. R., Montero, M. L. G.-R., Vidal, J. R., Puro, L. M. C., Toscano, A., Gómez, P., Abad, M., Izquierdo, T., & Gómez, G. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15052655
From Waste to Value: Techno-Economic Analyses of Lithium Extraction from Oilfield Brine
Disu, B., Rafati, R., Sharifi, A., & Kapaia, M. (2025) · SPE Offshore Europe Conference & Exhibition · doi:10.2118/226812-ms
Advances in cell structure design for electrochemical lithium extraction
Abbas, A., Xiao, C., Wang, T., Muhammad, K., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Environmental Surfaces and Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.esi.2026.01.002
Walgama, S., Hewage, K., Hussain, S. A., & Sadiq, R. (2026) · Mining Metallurgy & Exploration · doi:10.1007/s42461-026-01492-5
Sustainably developing lithium resources from low-temperature sedimentary-basin brines
Peng, X.-L., Jiang, C.-Q., Yuan, W., & Chen, Z.-H. (2026) · Cleaner Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.clet.2026.101189
Bostancı, K., Sever, B., Altıok, E., Jarma, Y. A., Kabay, N., Arda, M., Nishihama, S., & Yoshizuka, K. (2026) · Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology · doi:10.3389/frmst.2026.1843267
Zhang, Y., Ke, X., Yan, Z., & Hao, C. (2026) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2026.124591
Energy efficiency and sustainability of desalination
Wang, R., Chen, Y., Griffin, A. M., Deshmukh, A., del Cerro, M., Liu, W., Lienhard, J. H., Lin, S., & Elimelech, M. (2026) · Nature Reviews Clean Technology · doi:10.1038/s44359-026-00221-x
- Authors
- Warren, I.
- Affiliations
- National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
- Corresponding author
- Warren, Ian
- ORCID
- Warren, Ian
- Published
- 2021-05-01
- OpenAlex
- W3163261753
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE -AC36-08GO28308, 08GO28308, DE-AC36, Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308, AC36‐08GO28308)
- Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (DE-AC36-08-GO28308., AC36-08-GO28308)
- Geothermal Technologies Office (DE‐AC36‐08GO28308)
- Office of Energy Efficiency
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory (DE-AC36-08-GO28308, AC36-08GO28308)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
- Keywords
- lithium recovery, geothermal brine, direct lithium extraction, Salton Sea, critical mineral supply chains, techno-economic analysis, hard rock mining, carbon intensity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review