The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictive Landscapes and New Physics at a TeV
Open accessAbstract
We propose that the Standard Model is coupled to a sector with an enormous landscape of vacua, where only the dimensionful parameters--the vacuum energy and Higgs masses--are finely ''scanned'' from one vacuum to another, while dimensionless couplings are effectively fixed. This allows us to preserve achievements of the usual unique-vacuum approach in relating dimensionless couplings while also accounting for the success of the anthropic approach to the cosmological constant problem. It can also explain the proximity of the weak scale to the geometric mean of the Planck and vacuum energy scales. We realize this idea with field theory landscapes consisting of N fields and 2{sup N} vacua, where the fractional variation of couplings is smaller than 1/{radical}N. These lead to a variety of low-energy theories including the Standard Model, the MSSM, and Split SUSY. This picture suggests sharp new rules for model-building, providing the first framework in which to simultaneously address the cosmological constant problem together with the big and little hierarchy problems. Requiring the existence of atoms can fix ratio of the QCD scale to the weak scale, thereby providing a possible solution to the hierarchy problem as well as related puzzles such as the {mu} and doublet-triplet splitting problems. We also present new approaches to the hierarchy problem, where the fine-tuning of the Higgs mass to exponentially small scales is understood by even more basic environmental requirements such as vacuum stability and the existence of baryons. These theories predict new physics at the TeV scale, including a dark matter candidate. The simplest theory has weak-scale ''Higgsinos'' as the only new particles charged under the Standard Model, with gauge coupling unification near 10{sup 14} GeV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter
Arkani–Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., & Dvali, G. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00466-3 · Cited by 6,563
Anthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant
Weinberg, S. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2607 · Cited by 1,166
The statistics of string/M theory vacua
Douglas, M. R. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/046 · Cited by 791
What does inflation really predict?
Tegmark, M. (2005) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2005/04/001 · Cited by 216
Why Is the Cosmic Microwave Background Fluctuation Level 10−5?
Tegmark, M., & Rees, M. J. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305673 · Cited by 159
Cited by
Arvanitaki, A., Dimopoulos, S., Dubovsky, S., Kaloper, N., & March-Russell, J. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.123530 · Cited by 1,941
Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications
van Beest, M., Calderón-Infante, J., Mirfendereski, D., & Valenzuela, I. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 · Cited by 336
The Cosmological Constant and the String Landscape
Polchinski, J. (2006) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0603249 · Cited by 164
Density perturbations and the cosmological constant from inflationary landscapes
Feldstein, B., Hall, L. J., & Watari, T. (2005) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.123506 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Arkani-Hamed, N.
- Published
- 2005-01-28
- OpenAlex
- W1514062946
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 6
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.