Cited by 65Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchAttachment and Relationship DynamicsRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies

The Relationship Between Social Support, Social Constraint, and Psychological Adjustment for Patients with Rare Autoimmune Disease

Open access
Carpenter, Delesha M., Thorpe, Carolyn T., Alexander, Dayna S., Sage, Adam J., Lewis, Megan, Hogan, Susan L., Geryk, Lorie L., DeVellis, Robert F.·2016·Current Rheumatology Reviews

Abstract

Our goals were to describe the balance of social support to negative social interactions (i.e. social constraint) for autoimmune disease patients and determine whether support and constraint from spouses and non-spousal family and friends interact to influence patients' psychological adjustment. Using crosssectional survey data from 109 married vasculitis and lupus patients, we found that patients reported that spouses and family/friends provided more social support than social constraint. In regression models, constraint from spouses (β= -0.45, p<0.01) and family/friends (β= -0.89, p<0.001) were associated with worse patient psychological adjustment. A significant 3-way interaction revealed that patients with low spousal support had worse psychological adjustment as the levels of family and friend support increased. In contrast, patients with high levels of spousal support reported better psychological adjustment as family and friend support increased. Future longitudinal studies may help to elucidate the complex interplay between constraint and support from spouses, family, and friends.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1573397112666160719163145

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quality of life of patients with ROD is lower than for the general population in three key areas: physical limitations, social isolation and stigmatization, and emotional distress.

    “The quality of life of patients with ROD is lower than for the general population in three key areas: physical limitations (movements, pain, sleep problems, attention or concentration problems that affect daily life), [3–9], social isolation and stigmatization [3, 7, 9–13], and emotional distress (anger, depression, anxiety, hopelessness, loss, lack of control, abandonment) [3, 5, 8, 14–17].”

    From Connect-ROD – development and qualitative evaluation of a community-based group intervention to support well-being in patients with a rare or orphan disease (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says people with chronic disease are likely to experience anxiety and depression, and the Discussion links negative social interactions with poorer psychological adjustment in patients with lupus or vasculitis. The paper does not establish that patients with rare diseases have lower quality of life than the general population across the three stated areas; in particular, it does not substantiate the physical-limitations or stigmatization components. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients with ROD experience social isolation and often have difficulty finding a support community because of the rarity of their condition.

    “Patients experience social isolation and often have difficulty finding a support community because of the rarity of their condition [3, 10, 11].”

    From Connect-ROD – development and qualitative evaluation of a community-based group intervention to support well-being in patients with a rare or orphan disease (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Introduction discusses support from spouses, family, and friends, and the Discussion examines social constraints among patients with rare autoimmune conditions (pages not provided). Neither section addresses social isolation or difficulty finding a support community because a condition is rare. Searches for those concepts found no passage that does. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]Cohen S Gottlieb BH Underwood LG Social relationships and health Cohen S Gottlieb BH Underwood LG Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientist New York Oxford University Press 2000 3 25
  2. [2]House JS Kahn R Measures and concepts of social support Cohen S Syme SL Social Support and Health Orlando Academic Press 1985 83 108
  3. [28]Eaton W Smith CB Ybarra M Muntaner C Tien A Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CESD) scale: Review and revision (CESD- CESD-R) Maruish M The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: instruments for adults 3rd Mahwah Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2004 363 78
  4. [33]Dunkel-Schetter C Bennett TL Differentiating the cognitive and behavioral aspects of social support Sarason LG Sarason BR Pierce GR Social support: An interactional view New York Wiley 1990 267 296

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carpenter, D. M., Thorpe, C. T., Alexander, D. S., Sage, A. J., Lewis, M., Hogan, S. L., Geryk, L. L., & DeVellis, R. F.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Asheville (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • RTI International (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Current Rheumatology Reviews
Published
2016-10-20
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
232-238
ISSN
1573-3971 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2480304270
Cited by
65
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Rheumatology Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32dk007750-21)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P01DK058335, T32-DK007750)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P60AR049465)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Keywords
social support, social constraints, psychological adjustment, rare autoimmune diseases, vasculitis, lupus, spousal support, family and friend support, social interaction, three-way interaction
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Male, Middle Aged, Social Support, Spouses, Rare Diseases, Systemic Vasculitis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review