Cited by 32Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Wolves, Elk, Bison, and Secondary Trophic Cascades in Yellowstone National Park

Open access
Ripple, William J., Painter, Luke E., Beschta, Robert L., Gates, C. Cormack·2010·The Open Ecology Journal

Abstract

Wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park in 1995/96, likely reestablishing a trophic cascade involving wolves, elk, and woody browse species.The return of wolves may have also triggered a secondary trophic cascade involving bison, which are generally a minor prey species for wolves in northern Yellowstone.We hypothesize a sequence of events in northern Yellowstone where: 1) wolves prey on elk, changing elk behavior and reducing elk numbers, 2) causing reduced elk herbivory and more forage available to bison, and 3) allowing higher bison densities and additional bison effects on the ecosystem.This secondary trophic cascade, whereby wolf predation may have indirectly allowed bison numbers to increase through a reduction in inter-specific competition with elk, may represent an example of an alternative top-down pathway by which predators can influence multiple trophic levels through mediating the competitive interaction between two prey species.Both wolves and bison can have important effects on ecosystems, and there is growing interest in restoring these animals to wider portions of their former range.However, there are many potential routes for interactions between species and it is important to consider the conservation implications of other cascading effects when reintroducing such ecologically influential species into wild landscapes.The potential benefits of bison to their native ecosystems may not be realized in situations with low predation pressure, high bison densities, and constraints on bison movement and migration, thus likely contributing to impairment of resources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/1874213001003030031

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only recently, as elk have decreased and bison increased, have bison emerged as an important factor affecting the dynamics of these woody plants.

    “Only recently, as elk have decreased and bison increased, have bison emerged as an important factor affecting the dynamics of these woody plants (Beschta et al., 2020; Painter & Ripple, 2012; Ripple et al., 2010; Rose & Cooper, 2016).”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Ripple et al., 2010

    In “Bison and Secondary Trophic Cascades,” the paper reports declining elk, increasing bison, and observed bison browsing of willow and other woody plants in the Lamar Valley. But it says bison *may* be suppressing willow growth in some areas; it does not establish as fact that bison have emerged as an important factor in woody-plant dynamics generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Since the late 1990s, bison have increased greatly in number on the northern range and are present year-round.

    “Since the late 1990s, bison have increased greatly in number on the northern range and are present year-round (Gates et al. 2005, Ripple et al. 2010, Painter et al. 2015)”

    From Tall willow thickets return to northern Yellowstone (2020) · cites this paper as Ripple et al. 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Becker, MS, Garrott, RA, White, PJ, Gower, CN, Bergman, EJ & Jaffe, R (2009) Wolf prey selection in an elk-bison system: choice or circumstance? In: Garrott, RA, White, PJ & Watson, FGR (Eds) The Ecology of Large Mammals in Central Yellowstone: Sixteen Years of Integrated Field Studies, Academic Press/Elsevier: Boston, 305-37.
  2. Beyer, HL (2006) Wolves, elk and willow on Yellowstone National Park's northern range. M.S. Thesis. University of Alberta: Edmonton.
  3. Bradley, M & Wilmshurst, J (2005) The fall and rise of bison populations in Wood Buffalo National Park: 1971 to 2003. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 1195-205.
  4. Fuller, JA, Garrott, RA & White, PJ (2007) Emigration and density dependence in Yellowstone bison. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71, 1924-33.
  5. Garrott, RA, Eberhardt, LL & White, PJ (2003) Climate-induced variation in vital rates of an unharvested large-herbivore population. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 81, 33.
  6. Garrott, RA, White, PJ & Watson, FGR (Eds) (2009) The Ecology of Large Mammals in Central Yellowstone: Sixteen Years of Integrated Field Studies. Academic Press/Elsevier: Boston.
  7. Hartnett, DC, Hickman, KR & Walter, LE (1996) Effects of bison grazing, fire, and topography on floristic diversity in tallgrass prairie. Journal of Range Management, 49, 413-20.
  8. Holt, RD & Lawton, JH (1994) The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25, 495-520.
  9. Joly, DO & Messier, F (2004) Testing hypotheses of bison population decline (1970-1999) in Wood Buffalo National Park: synergism between exotic disease and predation. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 82, 1165-76.
  10. Larter, NC & Gates, CC (1991) Diet and habitat selection of wood bison in relation to seasonal changes in forage quantity and quality. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69, 2677-85.
  11. Laundre, JW, Hernandez, L & Altendorf, KB (2001) Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the "landscape of fear" in Yellowstone National Park, USA. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79, 1401-9.
  12. Laundre, JW, Hernandez, L & Ripple, WJ (2010) The landscape of fear: ecological implications of being afraid. Open Ecology Journal, 3, 1-7.
  13. MacNulty, DR, Mech, LD & Smith, DW (2007) A proposed ethogram of large-carnivore predatory behavior, exemplified by the wolf. Journal of Mammalogy, 88, 595-605.
  14. Meagher, MM, Taper, ML & Jerde, CL (2002) Recent changes in population distribution: the Pelican bison and the domino effect, In: Yellowstone Lake: Hotbed of Chaos or Reservoir of Resilience? 6th Biennial Scientific Conference on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (2001), Yellowstone National Park, National Park Service, 135-37.
  15. National Research Council (2002) Ecological Dynamics on Yellowstone's Northern Range, National Academy Press: Washington DC.
  16. Shaw, JH & Meagher, M (2000) Bison, In: Demarais, S & Krauseman, PR (Eds.) Ecology and management of large mammals in North America, New York: Prentice Hall, 447-66.
  17. Singer, FJ & Norland, JE (1994) Niche relationships within a guild of ungulate species in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, following release from artificial controls. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 72, 1383-94.
  18. Singer, FJ, Wang, G & Hobbs, NT (2003) The role of grazing ungulates and large keystone predators on plants, community structure, and ecosystem processes in national parks, In: Zabel, CJ & Anthony, RG (Eds) Mammal Community Dynamics: Conservation and Management in Coniferous Forests of Western North America, New York: Cambridge University Press, 444-86.
  19. Smith, DW, Stahler, DR, Guernsey, DS & Bangs, E (2006) Wolf Restoration in Yellowstone National Park, In: McCullough, DR, Kaji, K & Yamanaka, M (Eds.) Wildlife in Shiretoko and Yellowstone National Parks: Lessons in Wildlife Conservation from two World Heritage sites, Hokkaido, Japan: Shiretoko Nature Foundation, 242-53.
  20. Waggoner, V & Hinkes, M (1986) Summer and fall browse utilization by an Alaskan bison herd. Journal of Wildlife Management, 50, 322- 423.
  21. White, PJ, Proffitt, KM, Mech, LD, Evans, SB, Cunningham, JA & Hamlin, KL (2010) Migration of northern Yellowstone elk: implications of spatial structuring. Journal of Mammalogy, 91, 827-37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ripple, W. J., Painter, L. E., Beschta, R. L., & Gates, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
The Open Ecology Journal
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
31-37
ISSN
1874-2130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120301040
Cited by
32
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Open Ecology Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
wolf reintroduction, elk, bison, trophic cascades, predator-prey interactions, interspecific competition, woody browse, top-down control, Yellowstone National Park, bison conservation, predator reintroduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review