The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Rationalization of Charity: The Influences of Professionalism in the Nonprofit Sector
Abstract
This paper analyzes how professional values and practices influence the character of nonprofit organizations, with data from a random sample of 501 (c)(3) operating charities in the San Francisco Bay Area collected between 2003 and 2004. Expanded professionalism in the nonprofit world involves not only paid, full-time careers and credentialed expertise but also the integration of professional ideals into the everyday world of charitable work. We develop key indicators of professionalism and measure organizational rationalization as expressed in the use of strategic planning, independent financial audits, quantitative program evaluation, and consultants. As hypothesized, charities operated by paid personnel and full-time management show higher levels of rationalization. While traditional professionals (doctors, lawyers, and the clergy) do not differ significantly from executives with no credentialed background in eschewing business-like practices, managerial professionals champion such efforts actively, as do semi-professionals, albeit more modestly. Management training is also an important spur to rationalization. We assess what is gained and lost and the tension that can arise when nonprofits become professionalized and adopt more methodical, bureaucratic procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733
Putnam, R. D. (2007) · Scandinavian Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x · Cited by 4,027
Institutional conditions for diffusion
Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/bf00993595 · Cited by 2,114
Cited by
Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.590299 · Cited by 3,519
Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing – Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014) · The Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.893615 · Cited by 2,107
SKELCHER, C., & SMITH, S. R. (2015) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12105 · Cited by 649
Nonprofit Organizations Becoming Business-Like: A Systematic Review
Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764014561796 · Cited by 594
How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle
Thompson, T. A., Purdy, J. M., & Ventresca, M. J. (2018) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1285 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 268-298
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3815
- OpenAlex
- W2098099463
- Cited by
- 876
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 91.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Rationalization of Charity: The Influences of Professionalism in the Nonprofit Sector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268
- The paper
- Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The Rationalization of Charity: The Influences of Professionalism in the Nonprofit Sector. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.