Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Koehler, Matthew J., Mishra, Punya·2005·Journal of Educational Computing Research
DOI 10.2190/0ew7-01wb-bkhl-qdyv
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We introduce Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) as a way of representing what teachers need to know about technology, and argue for the role of authentic design-based activities in the development of this knowledge. We report data from a faculty development design seminar in which faculty members worked together with masters students to develop online courses. We developed and administered a survey that assessed the evolution of student- and faculty-participants' learning and perceptions about the learning environment, theoretical and practical knowledge of technology, course content (the design of online courses), group dynamics, and the growth of TPCK. Analyses focused on observed changes between the beginning and end of the semester. Results indicate that participants perceived that working in design teams to solve authentic problems of practice to be useful, challenging and fun. More importantly, the participants, both as individuals and as a group, appeared to have developed significantly in their knowledge of technology application, as well as in their TPCK. In brief, learning by design appears to be an effective instructional technique to develop deeper understandings of the complex web of relationships between content, pedagogy and technology and the contexts in which they function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/0ew7-01wb-bkhl-qdyv

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.3102/0013189X025008037 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bromley H., 1998, Education, technology, power, 1
  3. 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Brown A. L., 1996, Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice, 229
  5. 10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.2307/1176008 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.2190/7HPQ-4F3X-8M8Y-TVCA · DOI
  8. Bruce B. C., 1993, Network-based classrooms, 9
  9. Carr A. A., 1998, Educational Technology, 38, 5
  10. 10.1207/s15326985ep2703_7 · DOI
  11. 10.3102/0013189X032001005 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dewey J., 1934, Art as experience
  13. Dewey J., 1949, Knowing and the known
  14. 10.2307/1167381 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Handler M. G., 1997, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 13, 16
  16. 10.1080/1049482900010102 · DOI
  17. Harel IS., 1991, Constructionism
  18. Hickman L., 1990, John Dewey's pragmatic technology
  19. Hughes J. E., 2005, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 377
  20. Kafai Y., 1996, Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in a digital world, 71
  21. Kafai Y. B., 1996, Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world
  22. Koehler M. J., 2005, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21, 94
  23. Koehler M. J., 2004, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12, 25
  24. Koehler M. J., 2004, Successful teaching with technology: The complex interplay of content, pedagogy, and technology
  25. Lehrer R., 1993, Computers as cognitive tools, 197
  26. Lundeberg M. A., 2003, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1
  27. 10.2190/JXBR-2G0G-1E4T-7T4M · DOI
  28. 10.1086/461870 · DOI
  29. Mishra P., 2003, What teacher should know about technology: Perspectives and practices, 99
  30. Mishra P., Faculty development by design: Integrating technology in higher education
  31. Mishra P. & Koehler M. K. (In press b). Designing learning from day one: A first day activity to foster design thinking about educational technology. Teachers College Record.
  32. Mishra P. & Koehler M. J. (In press c). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record.
  33. Mishra P., 1996, Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing, 287
  34. Papert S., 1991, Constructionism, 1
  35. Pea R. D., 1993, Distributed cognitions, 47
  36. Perkins D.N., 1986, Knowledge as design
  37. 10.3402/rlt.v12i1.11225 · DOI
  38. 10.1207/s15326985ep2704_3 · DOI
  39. Rosenblatt L. N., 1978, The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of literary work
  40. 10.1007/978-94-011-0495-1 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Roup R., 1993, LabNet: Toward a community of practice
  42. 10.2307/1175860 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Wise A., 2000, Log on or lose out: Technology in 21st century teacher education, 219
  44. 10.1007/BF02297091 · DOI
  45. Zhao Y., 2003, What teachers should know about technology: Perspectives and practices

Cited by

See all 1,437

Metadata

Authors
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P.
Venue
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2005-03
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
131-152
ISSN
  • 0735-6331 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4140
DOI
10.2190/0ew7-01wb-bkhl-qdyv
OpenAlex
W2132687596
Cited by
1,437
References
8
FWCI
33.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.