Cited by 534Higher Education Research StudiesEvasion and Academic Success FactorsCareer Development and Diversity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Psychology Underlying Successful Retention Practices

Bean, John, Eaton, Shevawn Bogdan·2001·Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice

Abstract

This article describes the psychological processes that lead to academic and social integration based on a retention model proposed by the authors (Bean & Eaton, 2000). It also describes how successful retention programs such as learning communities, freshman interest groups, tutoring, and orientation rely on psychological processes. Four psychological theories form the basis for our recommendations: attitude-behavior theory which provides the overall structure of the theoretical model, and coping behavioral (approach-avoidance) theory, self-efficacy theory, and attribution (locus of control) theory that lead to academic and social integration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/6r55-4b30-28xg-l8u0

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Astin A.W., 1984, Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297
  2. Barefoot B.O. & Gardner J. N. (1993). The freshman orientation seminar: Extending the benefits of traditional orientation. In Upcraft M. L. (Ed.), Designing successful transitions: A guide for orienting students to college. The Freshman Year Experience. Monograph Series Number 13, 141–153.
  3. Bean J. P., 2000, Reworking the departure puzzle: New theory and research on college student retention
  4. Braxton J. M., 2000, Reworking the departure puzzle: New theory and research on college student retention
  5. Bucklin R. W. & Bucklin M. L. (1970). The psychological characteristics of the college persister and the college leaver: A review. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 049 709.
  6. Connor-Linton J., 1995, Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 2, 105
  7. French J. R., 1974, Coping and adaptation, 316
  8. Hanley G., 1996, Journal of the Freshman Year Experience, 8, 47
  9. Kanoy K., 1996, Journal of the Freshman Year Experience & Students in Transition, 8, 7
  10. Markus G., 1993, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 410
  11. Sax L., 1997, Educational Record, 78, 25
  12. Schwitzer A. M., 1998, Journal of the Freshman Year Experience, 10, 31
  13. Yockey F., 1998, Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 10, 57

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 534

Metadata

Authors
Bean, J., & Eaton, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Northern Illinois University (US)
Venue
Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice
Published
2001-05
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
73-89
ISSN
  • 1521-0251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4167
OpenAlex
W2160476973
Cited by
464
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evasion and Academic Success Factors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
student retention, college retention, academic integration, social integration, learning communities, tutoring, orientation programs, coping styles, self-efficacy, locus of control, attribution theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review