Cited by 84Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingNursing care and researchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Family care for older adults with disabilities: toward more targeted and interpretable research

Gaugler, Joseph E., Kane, Robert L., Kane, Rosalie A.·2002·The International Journal of Aging and Human Development

Abstract

Family care of the elderly is key to the long-term care system, and its importance has led to an abundance of research over the past two decades. Several methodological and substantive issues, if addressed, could create even more targeted and interpretable research. The present review critically examines methodological topics (i.e., definitions of family caregiving, measurement of caregiving inputs) and conceptual issues (i.e., family involvement in long-term residential settings, and the care receiver's perspective on care) that have received insufficient attention in the caregiving literature. Throughout this review recommendations are offered to improve these areas and advance the state of the art.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/fack-qe61-y2j8-5l68

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As only children's parents begin to experience functional decline and enter a stage of heightened care needs, the nature of caregiving shifts from emotional companionship and financial support to more demanding physical care and long-term medical management.

    “As only children’s parents begin to experience functional decline and enter a stage of heightened care needs, the nature of caregiving shifts from emotional companionship and financial support to more demanding physical care and long-term medical management (23, 27).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaugler, J. E., Kane, R. L., & Kane, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Gaugler, Joseph E.
Venue
The International Journal of Aging and Human Development
Published
2002-04
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
205-231
ISSN
  • 0091-4150 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3535
OpenAlex
W2091126301
Cited by
84
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Aging and Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG00198-08)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
family caregiving, older adults with disabilities, long-term care, long-term residential care
MeSH terms
Aged, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Health Services Research, Home Nursing, Humans, Long-Term Care, United States, Frail Elderly, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review