Cited by 37Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Veterans’ Perspectives on Fitbit Use in Treatment for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: An Interview Study

Open access
Ng, Ada, Reddy, Madhu, Zalta, Alyson K, Schueller, Stephen M·2018·JMIR Mental Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The increase in availability of patient data through consumer health wearable devices and mobile phone sensors provides opportunities for mental health treatment beyond traditional self-report measurements. Previous studies have suggested that wearables can be effectively used to benefit the physical health of people with mental health issues, but little research has explored the integration of wearable devices into mental health care. As such, early research is still necessary to address factors that might impact integration including patients' motivations to use wearables and their subsequent data. Objective: The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of patients’ motivations to use or not to use wearables devices during an intensive treatment program for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). During this treatment, they received a complementary Fitbit. We investigated the following research questions: How did the veterans in the intensive treatment program use their Fitbit? What are contributing motivators for the use and nonuse of the Fitbit? Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 13 veterans who completed an intensive treatment program for PTSD. We transcribed and analyzed interviews using thematic analysis. Results: We identified three major motivations for veterans to use the Fitbit during their time in the program: increase self-awareness, support social interactions, and give back to other veterans. We also identified three major reasons certain features of the Fitbit were not used: lack of clarity around the purpose of the Fitbit, lack of meaning in the Fitbit data, and challenges in the veteran-provider relationship. Conclusions: To integrate wearable data into mental health treatment programs, it is important to understand the patient’s perspectives and motivations in using wearables. We also discuss how the military culture and PTSD may have contributed to our participants' behaviors and attitudes toward Fitbit usage. We conclude with possible approaches for integrating patient-generated data into mental health treatment settings that may address the challenges we identified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/10415

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [30]Martell CR Dimidjian S Herman-Dunn R Behavioral Activation for Depression: A Clinician's Guide 2013 New York City, NY Guilford Press
  2. [32]American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition: DSM-5 2013 Arlington, VA American Psychiatric Publishing
  3. [86]Department of Veterans Affairs 2017 2018-03-15 Women Veterans Report: The Past, Present, and Future of Women Veterans https://www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/SpecialReports/Women_Veterans_2015_Final.pdf 30080363

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, A., Reddy, M., Zalta, A. K., & Schueller, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ng, Ada
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2018-06-15
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
e10415
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802133293
Cited by
37
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (5R25MH08091607)
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Northwestern University (5R25MH08091607)
  • George Washington University
  • Health Services Research and Development
  • Washington University in St. Louis (5R25MH08091607)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001422)
  • Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (5R25MH08091607)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH103394, K08MH102336, R25MH080916)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
Fitbit, wearable devices, post-traumatic stress disorder, veterans, intensive treatment program, patient motivation, patient-generated health data, self-awareness, social support, military culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review