Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How LGBT+ Young People Use the Internet in Relation to Their Mental Health and Envisage the Use of e-Therapy: Exploratory Study

Lucassen, Mathijs, Samra, Rajvinder, Iacovides, Ioanna, Fleming, Theresa, Shepherd, Matthew, Stasiak, Karolina, Wallace, Louise·2018·JMIR Serious Games

Published version of a preprint

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/11249

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online environments have long served as critical spaces for self-disclosure, peer connection, and identity exploration for LGBTQ+ youth.

    “For LGBTQ+ youth in particular, online environments have long served as critical spaces for self-disclosure, peer connection, and identity exploration, functions that are especially vital for those living in unsupportive families or communities (Lucassen et al., 2018;Fish et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1177/0004867417713664 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1080/15374416.2014.958842 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.5172/jamh.2013.12.1.22 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0044118X13489142 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s10903-016-0530-z · DOI
  8. 10.3109/00048674.2011.559635 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s40894-018-0090-7 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1049732311425052 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s10615-014-0505-2 · DOI
  12. 10.2196/resprot.8397 · DOI
  13. Strauss, P, 2017, Trans Pathways: The Mental Health Experiences and Care Pathways of Trans Young People (Full Report)
  14. McDermott, E, 2016, Queer Futures: Understanding Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) Adolescents' Suicide, Self-Harm and Help-Seeking Behaviour (Main Results)
  15. 10.1080/13691058.2017.1335435 · DOI
  16. 2006, Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression and Anxiety
  17. 10.1037/sgd0000275 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.cbpra.2013.12.008 · DOI
  19. The Mental Health Taskforce,, 2016, The Five Year Forward View for Mental Health: A Report from the Independent Mental Health Taskforce to the NHS in England
  20. 10.2196/games.3804 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/19361653.2016.1256246 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Boyatzis, R, 1998, Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development
  24. 10.2196/mental.5878 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30017-8 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/jpc.12727 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/pro0000154 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.2196/humanfactors.7392 · DOI
  29. 10.2196/jmir.3529 · DOI
  30. 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00215 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lucassen, M., Samra, R., Iacovides, I., Fleming, T., Shepherd, M., Stasiak, K., & Wallace, L.
Venue
JMIR Serious Games
Published
2018-12-21
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
e11249
ISSN
2291-9279
Cited by
64
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review