Cited by 158LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The AFFIRM open pilot feasibility study: A brief affirmative cognitive behavioral coping skills group intervention for sexual and gender minority youth

Craig, Shelley L., Austin, Ashley·2016·Children and Youth Services Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.02.022

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craig, S. L., & Austin, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Barry University (US)
Corresponding author
Craig, Shelley L.
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
64
Pages
136-144
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2276827490
Cited by
158
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
16.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
sexual and gender minority youth, group intervention, depression, stress appraisal, community-based intervention, intervention feasibility, treatment acceptability, skill acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review