Cited by 50Digital Mental Health InterventionsCultural Competency in Health CareMental Health Treatment and Access

Cultural Adaptation of a Scalable World Health Organization E-Mental Health Program for Overseas Filipino Workers

Open access
Garabiles, Melissa R, Harper Shehadeh, Melissa, Hall, Brian J·2019·JMIR Formative Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic mental (e-mental) health interventions can address mental health needs of different populations. Cultural adaptation of these interventions is crucial to establish a better fit with the cultural group and to achieve better treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization's e-mental health program Step-by-Step for overseas Filipino workers. We used a framework which posits that cultural adaptation should enhance (1) relevance, wherein the cultural group can relate with the content; (2) acceptability, where the cultural group will not find any element offensive; (3) comprehensibility, where the program is understandable; and (4) completeness, wherein the adapted version covers the same concepts and constructs as the original program. We aimed to have English and Filipino and male and female versions. METHODS: Overall, 3 experienced Filipino psychologists provided their perspectives on the program and how it might be adapted for overseas Filipino workers. We then adapted the program and obtained feedback from 28 overseas Filipino workers from diverse industries through focus group discussions. We conducted 7 and 9 focus group discussions with male and female participants, respectively. Per discussion, cognitive interviewing was used to probe for relevance, acceptability, comprehensibility, and completeness of illustrations and text. Participant feedback guided iterative program adaptations, which were again shown to participants for validation and improvement. RESULTS: Several issues were raised by participants about the generic version of Step-by-Step. There were elements deemed irrelevant, like unfitting characters, lack of Filipino values, and unsuitable problems and activities. There were unacceptable components that were stigmatizing, political, inappropriate to context or subgroups, and too feminine for male users. Some elements were incomprehensible, unclear, or complicated. To address these issues, we made key adaptations. To enhance relevance, we adapted the narrative to match the experiences of overseas Filipino workers, incorporated Filipino values, and illustrated familiar problems and activities. To increase acceptability, our main characters were changed to wise elders rather than health professionals (reducing mental health and help-seeking stigma), political or unacceptable content was removed, and the program was made suitable for overseas Filipino workers from different sectors. To increase comprehension, we used English and Filipino languages, simplified the text to ease interpretation of abstract terms, and ensured that text and illustrations matched. We also used Taglish (ie, merged English and Filipino) when participants deemed pure Filipino translations sounded odd or incomprehensible. Finally, we retained the core elements and concepts included in the original Step-by-Step program to maintain completeness. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the utility of a 4-point framework that focuses on acceptance, relevance, comprehensibility, and completeness in cultural adaptation. Moreover, we achieved a culturally appropriate adapted version of the Step-by-Step program for overseas Filipino workers. We discuss lessons learned in the process to guide future cultural adaptation projects of e-mental health interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/11600

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional adaptations of SbS have been tested with Albanian, Chinese, and Filipino populations.

    “Additional adaptations of SbS have been tested with Albanian [34], Chinese [35], and Filipino [36] populations.”

    From Effects of a self-guided digital mental health self-help intervention for Syrian refugees in Egypt: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Abstract Results and Discussion > Principal Findings describe a Step-by-Step adaptation developed with overseas Filipino workers, supporting the Filipino portion of the sentence. But Discussion > Relevance of the Research says the adapted program would be evaluated in a future feasibility trial and randomized trial; this paper does not establish that the Filipino adaptation had been tested in a trial. The Albanian and Chinese citations are not being judged here. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Yellowlees PM Hilty DM Mucic D Mucic D Hilty DM Global/worldwide e-mental health: international and futuristic perspectives of telepsychiatry and the future e-Mental Health 2016 01 1 Switzerland Springer International Publishing 234 48
  2. [16]Manson S Wilson JP Keane TM Cross-cultural and multiethnic assessment of trauma Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD Second Edition 1997 01 1 New York Guilford Press 239 66
  3. [31]Craig P Dieppe P Macintyre S Michie S Nazareth I Petticrew M ResearchGate 2006 2019-02-17 Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32899190_Developing_and_Evaluating_Complex_Interventions_New_Guidance_Online

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garabiles, M. R., Harper Shehadeh, M., & Hall, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Ateneo de Manila University (PH)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Brian J
Venue
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2019-03-29
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
e11600
ISSN
2561-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911350452
Cited by
50
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Formative Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
cultural adaptation, digital mental health interventions, overseas Filipino workers, Filipino values, mental health stigma, help-seeking stigma, cognitive interviewing, Taglish, multilingual adaptation, narrative characters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review