Cited by 36Digital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMental Health Treatment and Access

The cost-effectiveness of an internet intervention to facilitate mental health help-seeking by young adults: randomized controlled trial

Open access
Le, Long Khanh-Dao, Sanci, Lena, Chatterton, Mary Lou, Kauer, Sylvia, Buhagiar, Kerrie, Mihalopoulos, Cathrine·2019·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little empirical evidence is available to support the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of internet interventions to increase help-seeking behavior for mental health in young adults. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a Web-based mental health help-seeking navigation tool (Link) in comparison with usual help-seeking strategies. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis alongside the main randomized trial of Link was conducted from the Australian health care sector perspective. Young adults aged 18 to 25 years were randomized to the Link intervention (n=205) or usual care (n=208) with 1- and 3-month follow-ups. The primary outcome of this study was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) measured by the assessment of quality of life-4D. Costs were calculated based on the self-reported resource use questionnaire and were reported in 2015 Australian dollars. Primary analyses were conducted as intention-to-treat and reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Completer analyses were conducted in a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Significantly more QALYs were gained in the intervention group than the control group (0.15 vs 0.14; P<.001). The intervention was associated with significantly lower health professional consultation costs at 1-month follow-up (mean costs Aus $98 vs Aus $162; P<.05). Costs of hospital services were lower at 3 months in the intervention arm (mean costs Aus $47 vs Aus $101); however, there was insufficient sample size to detect a significant difference between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the total costs between the 2 arms. Relative to the control group, those who received the intervention experienced 0.01 more QALYs (0.00-0.02) and had lower total health sector costs of Aus -$81 (Aus -$348 to Aus $186) over 3 months. The intervention was found to be more effective and less costly compared with usual help-seeking strategies. The intervention was 100% likely to be cost-effective below a willingness-to-pay value-for-money threshold of Aus $28,033 per QALY. Results were robust in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that the online youth mental health help-seeking Web service is a cost-effective intervention for young people aged 18 to 25 years compared with usual search strategies. Further research is required to confirm these results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12614001223628; https://www.anzctr.org.au /Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366731.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/13065

Cites

32 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies in Australia have found that an online intervention with the sole aim of increasing access to care for young people resulted in improvements to quality of life and was cost-saving compared with usual care.

    “some studies in Australia have found that an online intervention with the sole aim of increasing access to care for young people resulted in improvements to quality of life and was costsaving compared with usual care. 428”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [428]

    The Methods (Intervention Descriptions) describe Link as a tool to guide young adults toward mental health information and care, and the Results (Cost-Effectiveness) report significantly higher quality-of-life utility than with usual search strategies. The intervention had lower average costs, but that difference was not statistically significant; the Discussion (Principal Findings) gives it a 73% probability of being cost-saving. Saying it “was cost-saving” omits that uncertainty. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [37]Drummond MF Sculpher MJ Torrance GW O'Brien BJ Stoddart GL Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Fourth Edition 2015 Oxford Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Le, L. K.-D., Sanci, L., Chatterton, M. L., Kauer, S., Buhagiar, K., & Mihalopoulos, C.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Le, Long Khanh-Dao
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2019-07-22
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
e13065
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963957695
Cited by
35
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1035887)
  • Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
cost-effectiveness, online intervention, mental health help-seeking, young adults, quality-adjusted life years, health care costs, online mental health services, help-seeking barriers, youth mental health, willingness-to-pay threshold, hospital service costs, resource utilization (health care), value for money
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Adult, Mental Disorders, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Quality of Life, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review