Cited by 648Behavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Beyond frequency: Habit as mental construct

Verplanken, Bas·2006·British Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Progress in habit theory can be made by distinguishing habit from frequency of occurrence, and using independent measures for these constructs. This proposition was investigated in three studies using a longitudinal, cross‐sectional and experimental design on eating, mental habits and word processing, respectively. In Study 1, snacking habit and past snacking frequency independently predicted later snacking behaviour, while controlling for the theory of planned behaviour variables. Habit fully mediated the effect of past on later behaviour. In Study 2, habitual negative self‐thinking and past frequency of negative self‐thoughts independently predicted self‐esteem and the presence of depressive and anxiety symptoms. In Study 3, habit varied as a function of experimentally manipulated task complexity, while behavioural frequency was held constant. Taken together, while repetition is necessary for habits to develop, these studies demonstrate that habit should not be equated with frequency of occurrence, but rather should be considered as a mental construct involving features of automaticity, such as lack of awareness, difficulty to control and mental efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466605x49122

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the same number of repetitions a simple behaviour has a higher habit score than a complex behaviour.

    “It has also been used to show that for the same number of repetitions a simple behaviour has a higher habit score than a complex behaviour (Verplanken, 2006).”

    From How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world (2010) · cites this paper as Verplanken, 2006

  • In Verplanken's study, the number of repetitions was restricted, leaving it possible that the complex task could become as habitual as the simple task with more repetitions.

    “However, in his study, the number of repetitions was restricted, leaving it possible that the complex task could become as habitual as the simple task with more repetitions.”

    From How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world (2010) · cites this paper as Verplanken, 2006

  • Verplanken's (2006) findings have suggested that complex behaviours achieve lower levels of automaticity than simple behaviours.

    “Verplanken's (2006) findings have suggested that complex behaviours achieve lower levels of automaticity than simple behaviours.”

    From How are habits formed: modelling habit formation in the real world (2010) · cites this paper as Verplanken, 2006

  • Frequency cannot distinguish between reasoned and automatic action because, in unvarying contexts, both repeated deliberation and habit can result in the same pattern of frequent behaviour.

    “but frequency cannot distinguish between reasoned and automatic action because, in unvarying contexts, both repeated deliberation and habit can result in the same pattern of frequent behaviour [23,24].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verplanken, B.
Affiliations
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
Verplanken, Bas
Venue
British Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
639-656
ISSN
  • 0144-6665 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8309
OpenAlex
W2019356367
Cited by
648
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 37
FWCI
29.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
habit, frequency of occurrence, habit formation, automaticity, snacking, self-esteem, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, theory of planned behavior, task complexity, word processing, mental efficiency
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Habits, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Models, Theoretical, Norway, Psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review