Cited by 42Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareReproductive Health and Contraception

Impact of a Blended Periconception Lifestyle Care Approach on Lifestyle Behaviors: Before-and-After Study

Open access
van der Windt, Melissa, van der Kleij, Rianne Maria, Snoek, Katinka Marianne, Willemsen, Sten Paul, Dykgraaf, Ramon Henny Maria, Laven, Joop Stephanus Elisabeth, Schoenmakers, Sam, Steegers-Theunissen, Régine Patricia Maria·2020·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Periconception lifestyle behaviors affect maternal, paternal, offspring, and transgenerational health outcomes. Previous research in other target populations has shown that personalized lifestyle interventions, in which face-to-face counseling and eHealth (“blended care”) are combined, may effectively target these lifestyle behaviors. Objective: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a periconceptional lifestyle intervention on the improvement of specific lifestyle components. Methods: A blended periconception lifestyle care approach was developed, combining the outpatient lifestyle counseling service “Healthy Pregnancy” with the eHealth platform “Smarter Pregnancy” (www.smarterpregnancy.co.uk) in which lifestyle was coached for 24 weeks. All couples contemplating pregnancy or already pregnant (≤12 weeks of gestation) who visited the outpatient clinics of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, the Netherlands, between June and December 2018, were invited to participate. We measured changes in lifestyle behaviors at weeks 12 and 24 compared with baseline. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the changes in lifestyle behaviors over time. Subgroup analyses were performed for women with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), women pregnant at the start of the intervention, and those participating as a couple. Results: A total of 539 women were screened for eligibility, and 450 women and 61 men received the blended periconception intervention. Among the participating women, 58.4% (263/450) were included in the preconception period. Moreover, 78.9% (403/511) of the included participants completed the online lifestyle coaching. At baseline, at least one poor lifestyle behavior was present in most women (379/450, 84.2%) and men (58/61, 95.1%). In the total group, median fruit intake increased from 1.8 to 2.2 pieces/day (P<.001) and median vegetable intake increased from 151 to 165 grams/day (P<.001) after 24 weeks of online coaching. The probability of taking folic acid supplementation among women increased from 0.97 to 1 (P<.001), and the probability of consuming alcohol and using tobacco in the total group decreased from 0.25 to 0.19 (P=.002) and from 0.20 to 0.15 (P=.63), respectively. Overall, the program showed the strongest effectiveness for participating couples. Particularly for vegetable and fruit intake, their consumption increased from 158 grams/day and 1.8 pieces/day at baseline to 190 grams/day and 2.7 pieces/day at the end of the intervention, respectively. Conclusions: We succeeded in including most participating women in the preconception period. A high compliance rate was achieved and users demonstrated improvements in several lifestyle components. The blended periconception lifestyle care approach seems to be an effective method to improve lifestyle behaviors. The next step is to further disseminate this approach and to perform a randomized trial to compare the use of blended care with the provision of only eHealth. Additionally, the clinical relevance of these results will need to be substantiated further.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/19378

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies aimed to implement preconception care (PCC) programs and some successfully led to an improved level of knowledge regarding PCC and subsequent improved periconceptional lifestyle behaviours.

    “Several studies aimed to implement PCC programs and some successfully led to an improved level of knowledge regarding PCC and subsequent improved periconceptional lifestyle behaviours [7, 18–20].”

    From Associations between periconceptional lifestyle behaviours and adverse pregnancy outcomes (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Discussion (Main Findings; page not specified) reports that targeted lifestyle components improved after the 24-week periconception intervention. The paper does not report an improvement in knowledge about preconception care or establish that improved knowledge led to the behavior changes; the Discussion (The Black Box of eHealth) says the mechanism remains unclear. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [1]Tamakoshi A Tamakoshi K Lin Y Yagyu K Kikuchi S JACC Study Group Healthy lifestyle and preventable death: findings from the Japan Collaborative Cohort (JACC) Study Prev Med 2009 5 48 5 486 92 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.02.017 19254743 19254743 · DOI
  2. [3]Manuel DG Perez R Sanmartin C Taljaard M Hennessy D Wilson K Tanuseputro P Manson H Bennett C Tuna M Fisher S Rosella LC Measuring Burden of Unhealthy Behaviours Using a Multivariable Predictive Approach: Life Expectancy Lost in Canada Attributable to Smoking, Alcohol, Physical Inactivity, and Diet PLoS Med 2016 8 13 8 e1002082 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002082 27529741 27529741 PMC4986987 · DOI
  3. [4]O'Doherty MG Cairns K O'Neill V Lamrock F Jørgensen T Brenner H Schöttker B Wilsgaard T Siganos G Kuulasmaa K Boffetta P Trichopoulou A Kee F Effect of major lifestyle risk factors, independent and jointly, on life expectancy with and without cardiovascular disease: results from the Consortium on Health and Ageing Network of Cohorts in Europe and the United States (CHANCES) Eur J Epidemiol 2016 5 31 5 455 68 10.1007/s10654-015-0112-8 26781655 26781655 PMC4901087 · DOI
  4. [5]Li K Hüsing A Kaaks R Lifestyle risk factors and residual life expectancy at age 40: a German cohort study BMC Med 2014 4 07 12 59 10.1186/1741-7015-12-59 24708705 24708705 PMC4022368 · DOI
  5. [6]van Dam RM Li T Spiegelman D Franco OH Hu FB Combined impact of lifestyle factors on mortality: prospective cohort study in US women BMJ 2008 9 16 337 a1440 10.1136/bmj.a1440 18796495 18796495 PMC2658866 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]McKenzie F Ellison-Loschmann L Jeffreys M Firestone R Pearce N Romieu I Healthy lifestyle and risk of breast cancer for indigenous and non-indigenous women in New Zealand: a case control study BMC Cancer 2014 1 10 14 12 10.1186/1471-2407-14-12 24410858 24410858 PMC3893580 · DOI
  7. [9]Nechuta SJ Shu X Li H Yang G Xiang Y Cai H Chow W Ji B Zhang X Wen W Gao Y Zheng W Combined impact of lifestyle-related factors on total and cause-specific mortality among Chinese women: prospective cohort study PLoS Med 2010 9 14 7 9 e1000339 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000339 20856900 20856900 PMC2939020 · DOI
  8. [10]Fransen HP May AM Beulens JW Struijk EA de Wit GA Boer JM Onland-Moret NC Hoekstra J van der Schouw YT Bueno-de-Mesquita HB Peeters PH Association between lifestyle factors and quality-adjusted life years in the EPIC-NL cohort PLoS One 2014 9 11 e111480 10.1371/journal.pone.0111480 25369457 25369457 PMC4219750 · DOI
  9. [12]Steegers-Theunissen RP Twigt J Pestinger V Sinclair KD The periconceptional period, reproduction and long-term health of offspring: the importance of one-carbon metabolism Hum Reprod Update 2013 19 6 640 55 10.1093/humupd/dmt041 23959022 23959022 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [13]Godfrey KM Gluckman PD Hanson MA Developmental origins of metabolic disease: life course and intergenerational perspectives Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010 4 21 4 199 205 10.1016/j.tem.2009.12.008 20080045 20080045 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [15]Bogaerts A Ameye L Bijlholt M Amuli K Heynickx D Devlieger R INTER-ACT: prevention of pregnancy complications through an e-health driven interpregnancy lifestyle intervention - study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017 5 26 17 1 154 10.1186/s12884-017-1336-2 28549455 28549455 PMC5446743 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [16]Oteng-Ntim E Varma R Croker H Poston L Doyle P Lifestyle interventions for overweight and obese pregnant women to improve pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Med 2012 5 10 10 47 10.1186/1741-7015-10-47 22574949 22574949 PMC3355057 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [17]Hammiche F Laven JS van Mil N de Cock M de Vries JH Lindemans J Steegers EA Steegers-Theunissen RP Tailored preconceptional dietary and lifestyle counseling in a tertiary outpatient clinic in The Netherlands Hum Reprod 2011 9 26 9 2432 41 10.1093/humrep/der225 21752799 21752799 · DOI
  14. [18]Van Dijk MR Huijgen NA Willemsen SP Laven JS Steegers EA Steegers-Theunissen RP Impact of an mHealth Platform for Pregnancy on Nutrition and Lifestyle of the Reproductive Population: A Survey JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016 5 27 4 2 e53 10.2196/mhealth.5197 27234926 27234926 PMC4902855 · DOI
  15. [19]van Dijk MR Oostingh EC Koster MP Willemsen SP Laven JS Steegers-Theunissen RP The use of the mHealth program Smarter Pregnancy in preconception care: rationale, study design and data collection of a randomized controlled trial BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017 1 26 17 1 46 10.1186/s12884-017-1228-5 28125970 28125970 PMC5270226 · DOI
  16. [20]Gootjes DV van Dijk MR Koster MP Willemsen SP Steegers EA Steegers-Theunissen RP Neighborhood Deprivation and the Effectiveness of Mobile Health Coaching to Improve Periconceptional Nutrition and Lifestyle in Women: Survey in a Large Urban Municipality in the Netherlands JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019 4 11 7 4 e11664 10.2196/11664 30973345 30973345 PMC6482404 · DOI
  17. [21]Boots LM de Vugt ME Kempen GI Verhey FR Effectiveness of a Blended Care Self-Management Program for Caregivers of People With Early-Stage Dementia (Partner in Balance): Randomized Controlled Trial J Med Internet Res 2018 7 13 20 7 e10017 10.2196/10017 30006327 30006327 PMC6064039 · DOI
  18. [22]Kouwenhoven-Pasmooij TA Djikanovic B Robroek SJ Helmhout P Burdorf A Hunink MG Design and baseline characteristics of the PerfectFit study: a multicenter cluster-randomized trial of a lifestyle intervention in employees with increased cardiovascular risk BMC Public Health 2015 7 28 15 715 10.1186/s12889-015-2059-9 26215589 26215589 PMC4517496 · DOI
  19. [27]van Dijk MR Koster MP Willemsen SP Huijgen NA Laven JS Steegers-Theunissen RP Healthy preconception nutrition and lifestyle using personalized mobile health coaching is associated with enhanced pregnancy chance Reprod Biomed Online 2017 10 35 4 453 460 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.014 28688924 28688924 · DOI
  20. [28]Pachauri S Male involvement in reproductive health care J Indian Med Assoc 2001 3 99 3 138 41 11478756 11478756
  21. [29]Murray E Hekler EB Andersson G Collins LM Doherty A Hollis C Rivera DE West R Wyatt JC Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: Key Questions and Approaches Am J Prev Med 2016 11 51 5 843 851 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.008 27745684 27745684 PMC5324832 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [30]Mohr DC Schueller SM Riley WT Brown CH Cuijpers P Duan N Kwasny MJ Stiles-Shields C Cheung K Trials of Intervention Principles: Evaluation Methods for Evolving Behavioral Intervention Technologies J Med Internet Res 2015 7 08 17 7 e166 10.2196/jmir.4391 26155878 26155878 PMC4526981 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [31]Lentferink AJ Oldenhuis HK de Groot M Polstra L Velthuijsen H van Gemert-Pijnen JE Key Components in eHealth Interventions Combining Self-Tracking and Persuasive eCoaching to Promote a Healthier Lifestyle: A Scoping Review J Med Internet Res 2017 8 01 19 8 e277 10.2196/jmir.7288 28765103 28765103 PMC5558041 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Windt, M., van der Kleij, R. M., Snoek, K. M., Willemsen, S. P., Dykgraaf, R. H. M., Laven, J. S. E., Schoenmakers, S., & Steegers-Theunissen, R. P. M.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2020-09-30
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
e19378
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045824067
Cited by
42
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • ZonMw
  • Erasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
preconception care, blended care, lifestyle intervention, e-health, online coaching, lifestyle counseling, fruit and vegetable intake, folic acid supplementation, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, maternal obesity, normal pregnancy, pregnancy planning, maternal outcomes, gestational weight gain, gestational diabetes risk, preterm birth
MeSH terms
Healthy Lifestyle, Mentoring, Adult, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review