App-Delivered Self-Management Intervention Trial selfBACK for People With Low Back Pain: Protocol for Implementation and Process Evaluation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Implementation and process evaluation is vital for understanding how interventions function in different settings, including if and why interventions have different effects or do not work at all. Objective: This paper presents the protocol for an implementation and process evaluation embedded in a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted in Denmark and Norway (the selfBACK project). selfBACK is a data-driven decision support system that provides participants with weekly self-management plans for low back pain. These plans are delivered through a smartphone app and tailored to individual participants by using case-based reasoning methodology. In the trial, we compare selfBACK in addition to usual care with usual care alone. Methods: The aim of this study is to conduct a convergent mixed-methods implementation and process evaluation of the selfBACK app by following the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework. We will evaluate the process of implementing selfBACK and investigate how participants use the intervention in daily life. The evaluation will also cover the reach of the intervention, health care provider willingness to adopt it, and participant satisfaction with the intervention. We will gather quantitative measures by questionnaires and measures of data analytics on app use and perform a qualitative exploration of the implementation using semistructured interviews theoretically informed by normalization process theory. Data collection will be conducted between March 2019 and October 2020. Results: The trial opened for recruitment in February 2019. This mixed-methods implementation and evaluation study is embedded in the randomized controlled trial and will be collecting data from March 2019 to October 2020; dissemination of trial results is planned thereafter. The results from the process evaluation are expected 2021-2022. Conclusions: This study will provide a detailed understanding of how self-management of low back pain can be improved and how a digital health intervention can be used as an add-on to usual care to support patients to self-manage their low back pain. We will provide knowledge that can be used to explore the possibilities of extending the generic components of the selfBACK system and key drivers that could be of use in other conditions and diseases where self-management is an essential prevention or treatment strategy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03798288; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03798288 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/20308
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315617444 · Cited by 12,703 · see citing works
Qaseem, A., Wilt, T. J., McLean, R. M., Forciea, M. A., & for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians* (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m16-2367 · Cited by 3,234 · see citing works
Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory
May, C., & Finch, T. (2009) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038509103208 · Cited by 2,115 · see citing works
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-32 · Cited by 1,871 · see citing works
The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time
Gaglio, B., Shoup, J. A., & Glasgow, R. E. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301299 · Cited by 1,029 · see citing works
May, C. R., Cummings, A., Girling, M., Bracher, M., Mair, F. S., May, C. M., Murray, E., Myall, M., Rapley, T., & Finch, T. (2018) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0758-1 · Cited by 683 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Normalization process theory [28] is an implementation theory [30] that provides a framework for the collection and analysis of data and a coherent set of explanations of implementation processes [34].”
BackgroundSelf-citationO’Connor, S., Hanlon, P., O’Donnell, C. A., Garcia, S., Glanville, J., & Mair, F. S. (2016) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Self-citationCan Mobile Phone Apps Influence People’s Health Behavior Change? An Evidence Review
Zhao, J., Freeman, B., & Li, M. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5692 · Cited by 618 · see citing works
Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management NICE guideline [NG59].
de Campos, T. F. (2017) · Journal of physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2017.02.012 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Lennon, M. R., Bouamrane, M.-M., Devlin, A. M., O'Connor, S., O'Donnell, C., Chetty, U., Agbakoba, R., Bikker, A., Grieve, E., Finch, T., et al. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6900 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Self-citationBeatty, L., & Lambert, S. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.03.004 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Dario, A. B., Moreti Cabral, A., Almeida, L., Ferreira, M. L., Refshauge, K., Simic, M., Pappas, E., & Ferreira, P. H. (2017) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.008 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Sandal, L. F., Stochkendahl, M. J., Svendsen, M. J., Wood, K., Øverås, C. K., Nordstoga, A. L., Villumsen, M., Rasmussen, C. D. N., Nicholl, B., Cooper, K., et al. (2019) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/14720 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Rasmussen, C. D. N., Svendsen, M. J., Wood, K., Nicholl, B. I., Mair, F. S., Sandal, L. F., Mork, P. J., Søgaard, K., Bach, K., & Stochkendahl, M. J.
- Affiliations
- National Research Centre for the Working Environment (DK)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Rasmussen, Charlotte Diana Nørregaard
- ORCID
- Venue
- JMIR Research Protocols
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2020-10-29
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e20308
- ISSN
- 1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7661240
- OpenAlex
- W3089176984
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission (689043, HORIZON2020)
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- low back pain, self-management, mobile application, digital health interventions, case-based reasoning, decision support system, implementation evaluation, process evaluation, Normalization Process Theory, usual care, patient satisfaction, app use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review