Cited by 87

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impacts of Low-cost Robotic Pets for Older Adults and People With Dementia: Scoping Review

Koh, Wei Qi, Ang, Faith Xin Hui, Casey, Dympna·2021·JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Older adults and people with dementia are particularly vulnerable to social isolation. Social robots, including robotic pets, are promising technological interventions that can benefit the psychosocial health of older adults and people with dementia. However, issues such as high costs can lead to a lack of equal access and concerns about infection control. Although there are previous reviews on the use of robotic pets for older adults and people with dementia, none have included or had a focus on low-cost and familiarly and realistically designed pet robots. Objective: The aim of this review is to synthesize evidence on the delivery and impact of low-cost, familiarly and realistically designed interactive robotic pets for older adults and people with dementia. Methods: The Arksey and O’Malley framework was used to guide this review. First, the research question was identified. Second, searches were conducted on five electronic databases and Google Scholar. Studies were selected using a two-phase screening process, where two reviewers independently screened and extracted data using a standardized data extraction form. Finally, the results were discussed, categorized, and presented narratively. Results: A total of 9 studies were included in the review. Positive impacts related to several psychosocial domains, including mood and affect, communication and social interaction, companionship, and other well-being outcomes. Issues and concerns associated with its use included misperceptions of the robotic pets as a live animal, ethical issues of attachment, negative reactions by users, and other pragmatic concerns such as hygiene and cost. Conclusions: Overall, the findings resonate with previous studies that investigated the effectiveness of other social robots, demonstrating the promise of these low-cost robotic pets in addressing the psychosocial needs of older adults and people with dementia. The affordability of these robotic pets appeared to influence the practicalities of real-world use, such as intervention delivery and infection control, which are especially relevant in light of COVID-19. Moving forward, studies should also consider comparing the effects of these low-cost robots with other robotic pets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/25340

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Low-cost, familiarly designed robotic pets and toys. Left to right: Joy for All cat, Joy for All dog, Perfect Petzzz cat, Perfect Petzzz dog.
Figure 1 Low-cost, familiarly designed robotic pets and toys. Left to right: Joy for All cat, Joy for All dog, Perfect Petzzz cat, Perfect Petzzz dog.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart.
Figure 2 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1159/000495813 · DOI
  2. DavidsonSRossallPEvidence review: loneliness in later lifeAge UK20152020-05-21https://www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-and-publications/reports-and-briefings/health--wellbeing/rb_june15_lonelines_in_later_life_evidence_review.pdf
  3. 10.1371/journal.pone.0220195 · DOI
  4. 10.1159/000441651 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1136/bmj.m1557 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.4017/gt.2016.15.4.003.00 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/roman.2004.1374827 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/14635240.2001.10806140 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/opn.12239 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1093/geront/gny046 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032468 · DOI
  13. 10.1186/s12877-019-1244-6 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1109/jproc.2012.2200559 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/geront/gnx180 · DOI
  16. 10.1515/pjbr-2019-0020 · DOI
  17. Heerink, M, 2013, Social Robotics, 104, 10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_11 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/13607863.2016.1262820 · DOI
  19. 10.3928/00989134-20130313-03 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/appy.12131 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1007/s12369-016-0366-7 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.05.007 · DOI
  23. 10.1186/s12879-017-2895-6 · DOI
  24. 10.13140/RG.2.2.30353.45922 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.008 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1089/jpm.2019.0157 · DOI
  28. 10.1145/3371382.3378256 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/1471301220932780 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1093/geronb/gbaa119 · DOI
  31. Marsilio, JN, 2018, JMU Scholarly Commons Physician Assistant Capstone
  32. McBride, V, 2017, California Assoc Long Term Care Med
  33. 10.1109/itecha.2017.8101940 · DOI
  34. 10.1136/eb-2014-101946 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/13607863.2020.1758906 · DOI
  36. Chang, WL, 2013, Social Robotics, 371, 10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_37 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/ajag.12099 · DOI
  38. 10.3389/fict.2017.00016 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/hast.918 · DOI
  40. Wang, VHS, 2017, Using Technology to Improve Care of Older Adults, 239
  41. 10.1371/journal.pone.0237069 · DOI
  42. Bemelmans, R, 2011, Human-Robot Personal Relationships, 83, 10.1007/978-3-642-19385-9_11 · DOI
  43. Nussbaum, MC, 2006, Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, 70

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 87

Metadata

Authors
Koh, W. Q., Ang, F. X. H., & Casey, D.
Venue
JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Published
2021-02-12
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e25340
ISSN
2369-2529
Cited by
87
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review