Cited by 19Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Technology acceptance and usability of a virtual reality intervention for military members and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: Mixed methods unified theory of acceptance and use of technology study

Open access
Jones, Chelsea, Miguel Cruz, Antonio, Smith-MacDonald, Lorraine, Brown, Matthew R G, Vermetten, Eric, Brémault-Phillips, Suzette·2022·JMIR Formative Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Military members and veterans exhibit higher rates of injuries and illnesses such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) because of their increased exposure to combat and other traumatic scenarios. Novel treatments for PTSD are beginning to emerge and increasingly leverage advances in gaming and other technologies, such as virtual reality. Without assessing the degree of technology acceptance and perception of usability to the end users, including the military members, veterans, and their attending therapists and staff, it is difficult to determine whether a technology-based treatment will be used successfully in wider clinical practice. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model is commonly used to address the technology acceptance and usability of applications in 5 domains. OBJECTIVE: Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model, the purpose of this study was to determine the technology acceptance and usability of multimodal motion-assisted memory desensitization and reconsolidation (3MDR) on a virtual reality system in the primary user group (military members and veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD, 3MDR therapists, and virtual reality environment operators). METHODS: This mixed methods embedded pilot study included military members (n=3) and veterans (n=8) with a diagnosis of combat-related PTSD, as well as their therapists (n=13) and operators (n=5) who completed pre-post questionnaires before and on completion of 6 weekly sessions of 3MDR. A partial least squares structural equation model was used to analyze the questionnaire results. Qualitative data from the interviews were assessed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Effort expectancy, which was the most notable predictor of behavioral intention, increased after a course of 3MDR with the virtual reality system, whereas all other constructs demonstrated no significant change. Participants' expectations of the technology were met, as demonstrated by the nonsignificant differences in the pre-post scores. The key qualitative themes included feasibility and function, technical support, and tailored immersion. CONCLUSIONS: 3MDR via a virtual reality environment appears to be a feasible, usable, and accepted technology for delivering 3MDR to military members and veterans who experience PTSD and 3MDR therapists and operators who facilitate their treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/33681

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]Armstrong CM Edwards-Stewart A Ciulla RP Bush N Cooper D Kinn JT Pruitt LD Skopp N Blasko K Hoyt T Department of defense mobile health practice guide. 4th edition 2018 09 01 Falls Church, VA, USA Defense Health Agency, U.S. Department of Defense
  2. [26]Hair Jr JF Hult GT Ringle CM Sarstedt M A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Second edition 2017 Thousand Oaks, CA, USA Sage Publications
  3. [36]Lincoln Y Guba E Naturalistic inquiry 1985 Newbury Park, CA, USA Sage Publications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, C., Miguel Cruz, A., Smith-MacDonald, L., Brown, M. R. G., Vermetten, E., & Brémault-Phillips, S.
Affiliations
  • Alberta Health Services (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Jones, Chelsea
Venue
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2022-04-21
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
e33681
ISSN
2561-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214661637
Cited by
19
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Formative Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Alberta Health Services
  • Government of Alberta
  • Government of Canada
  • Canadian Armed Forces
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, virtual reality, technology acceptance, usability, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, combat-related PTSD, military personnel, veterans, effort expectancy, behavioral intention, therapist perspectives, treatment-resistant PTSD

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review