Cited by 8Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsUsability and User Interface DesignInnovation in Digital Healthcare Systems

Automated Diet Capture Using Voice Alerts and Speech Recognition on Smartphones: Pilot Usability and Acceptability Study

Open access
Chikwetu, Lucy, Daily, Shaundra, Mortazavi, Bobak J, Dunn, Jessilyn·2023·JMIR Formative Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective monitoring of dietary habits is critical for promoting healthy lifestyles and preventing or delaying the onset and progression of diet-related diseases, such as type 2 diabetes. Recent advances in speech recognition technologies and natural language processing present new possibilities for automated diet capture; however, further exploration is necessary to assess the usability and acceptability of such technologies for diet logging. OBJECTIVE: This study explores the usability and acceptability of speech recognition technologies and natural language processing for automated diet logging. METHODS: We designed and developed base2Diet-an iOS smartphone application that prompts users to log their food intake using voice or text. To compare the effectiveness of the 2 diet logging modes, we conducted a 28-day pilot study with 2 arms and 2 phases. A total of 18 participants were included in the study, with 9 participants in each arm (text: n=9, voice: n=9). During phase I of the study, all 18 participants received reminders for breakfast, lunch, and dinner at preselected times. At the beginning of phase II, all participants were given the option to choose 3 times during the day to receive 3 times daily reminders to log their food intake for the remainder of the phase, with the ability to modify the selected times at any point before the end of the study. RESULTS: The total number of distinct diet logging events per participant was 1.7 times higher in the voice arm than in the text arm (P=.03, unpaired t test). Similarly, the total number of active days per participant was 1.5 times higher in the voice arm than in the text arm (P=.04, unpaired t test). Furthermore, the text arm had a higher attrition rate than the voice arm, with only 1 participant dropping out of the study in the voice arm, while 5 participants dropped out in the text arm. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study demonstrate the potential of voice technologies in automated diet capturing using smartphones. Our findings suggest that voice-based diet logging is more effective and better received by users compared to traditional text-based methods, underscoring the need for further research in this area. These insights carry significant implications for the development of more effective and accessible tools for monitoring dietary habits and promoting healthy lifestyle choices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/46659

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [3]IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edition 2022-10-23 https://diabetesatlas.org/
  2. [15]Bitesnap - Photo Food Journal 2023-01-20 https://getbitesnap.com
  3. [20]Naphtal R Natural language processing based nutritional application (Thesis) 2015 Massachusetts Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  4. [21]He Y Hakguder Z Shi X Mazzeo PL Frontoni E Sclaroff S Distante C Smart diet management through food image cooking recipe analysis Image Analysis and Processing. ICIAP 2022 Workshops. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 13373 2022 Cham Springer 82 93
  5. [40]Lowdermilk T User-Centered Design: A Developer's Guide to Building User-Friendly Applications 2013 Sebastopol, California O'Reilly Media, Inc

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chikwetu, L., Daily, S., Mortazavi, B. J., & Dunn, J.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Dunn, Jessilyn
Venue
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2023-05-16
Volume
7
Pages
e46659
ISSN
2561-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4376643274
Cited by
8
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Formative Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1851173)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
Keywords
speech recognition, natural language processing, mobile application, usability, acceptability, type 2 diabetes prevention, user attrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review