Cited by 111Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in HealthcareElectronic Health Records Systems

Potential of large language models in health care: Delphi study

Open access
Denecke, Kerstin, May, Richard, LLMHealthGroup, Rivera Romero, Octavio·2024·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: A large language model (LLM) is a machine learning model inferred from text data that captures subtle patterns of language use in context. Modern LLMs are based on neural network architectures that incorporate transformer methods. They allow the model to relate words together through attention to multiple words in a text sequence. LLMs have been shown to be highly effective for a range of tasks in natural language processing (NLP), including classification and information extraction tasks and generative applications. Objective: The aim of this adapted Delphi study was to collect researchers’ opinions on how LLMs might influence health care and on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of LLM use in health care. Methods: We invited researchers in the fields of health informatics, nursing informatics, and medical NLP to share their opinions on LLM use in health care. We started the first round with open questions based on our strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats framework. In the second and third round, the participants scored these items. Results: The first, second, and third rounds had 28, 23, and 21 participants, respectively. Almost all participants (26/28, 93% in round 1 and 20/21, 95% in round 3) were affiliated with academic institutions. Agreement was reached on 103 items related to use cases, benefits, risks, reliability, adoption aspects, and the future of LLMs in health care. Participants offered several use cases, including supporting clinical tasks, documentation tasks, and medical research and education, and agreed that LLM-based systems will act as health assistants for patient education. The agreed-upon benefits included increased efficiency in data handling and extraction, improved automation of processes, improved quality of health care services and overall health outcomes, provision of personalized care, accelerated diagnosis and treatment processes, and improved interaction between patients and health care professionals. In total, 5 risks to health care in general were identified: cybersecurity breaches, the potential for patient misinformation, ethical concerns, the likelihood of biased decision-making, and the risk associated with inaccurate communication. Overconfidence in LLM-based systems was recognized as a risk to the medical profession. The 6 agreed-upon privacy risks included the use of unregulated cloud services that compromise data security, exposure of sensitive patient data, breaches of confidentiality, fraudulent use of information, vulnerabilities in data storage and communication, and inappropriate access or use of patient data. Conclusions: Future research related to LLMs should not only focus on testing their possibilities for NLP-related tasks but also consider the workflows the models could contribute to and the requirements regarding quality, integration, and regulations needed for successful implementation in practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/52399

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. [3]Vaswani A Shazeer N Parmar N Uszkoreit J Jones L Gomez AN Kaiser L Polosukhin I Attention is all you need Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017 NIPS'17 December 4-9, 2017 Long Beach, CA
  2. [4]Lentzen M Linden T Veeranki S Madan S Kramer D Leodolter W Frohlich H A transformer-based model trained on large scale claims data for prediction of severe COVID-19 disease progression IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2023 09 27 9 4548 58 10.1109/JBHI.2023.3288768 37347632 37347632 · DOI
  3. [5]Lentzen M Madan S Lage-Rupprecht V Kühnel L Fluck J Jacobs M Mittermaier M Witzenrath M Brunecker P Hofmann-Apitius M Weber J Fröhlich H Critical assessment of transformer-based AI models for German clinical notes JAMIA Open 2022 11 15 5 4 ooac087 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac087 36380848 ooac087 36380848 PMC9663939 · DOI
  4. [6]Gillioz A Casas J Mugellini E Khaled OA Overview of the transformer-based models for NLP tasks Proceedings of the 2020 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems 2020 FedCSIS 2020 September 6-9, 2020 Sofia, Bulgaria 10.15439/2020F20 · DOI
  5. [7]Singhal K Azizi S Tu T Mahdavi SS Wei J Chung HW Scales N Tanwani A Cole-Lewis H Pfohl S Payne P Seneviratne M Gamble P Kelly C Babiker A Schärli N Chowdhery A Mansfield P Demner-Fushman D Agüera Y Arcas B Webster D Corrado GS Matias Y Chou K Gottweis J Tomasev N Liu Y Rajkomar A Barral J Semturs C Karthikesalingam A Natarajan V Large language models encode clinical knowledge Nature 2023 08 620 7972 172 80 10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2 37438534 10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2 37438534 PMC10396962 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [8]Wang W Yang Z Gao Y Ney H Transformer-based direct hidden markov model for machine translation Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing: Student Research Workshop 2021 ACL-IJCNLP 2021 August 5-6, 2021 Virtual Event 10.18653/v1/2021.acl-srw.3 · DOI
  7. [9]Liu Y Lapata M Hierarchical transformers for multi-document summarization Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2019 ACL 2019 July 28-August 2, 2019 Florence, Italy 10.18653/v1/p19-1500 · DOI
  8. [10]Li H Wang AY Liu Y Tang D Lei Z Li W An augmented transformer architecture for natural language generation tasks Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Mining Workshops 2019 ICDMW 2019 November 8-11, 2019 Beijing, China 10.1109/icdmw48858.2019.9024754 · DOI
  9. [11]Wang Y Gu Y Yin Y Han Y Zhang H Wang S Li C Quan D Multimodal transformer augmented fusion for speech emotion recognition Front Neurorobot 2023 5 22 17 1181598 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1181598 37283784 37283784 PMC10239840 · DOI
  10. [12]Yang X Bian J Hogan WR Wu Y Clinical concept extraction using transformers J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020 12 09 27 12 1935 42 10.1093/jamia/ocaa189 33120431 5943218 33120431 PMC7727351 · DOI
  11. [13]Devlin J Chang MW Lee K Toutanova K BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies 2019 NAACL-HLT 2019 June 2-7, 2019 Minneapolis, MN 10.18653/v1/n18-2 · DOI
  12. [14]Chow JC Sanders L Li K Impact of ChatGPT on medical chatbots as a disruptive technology Front Artif Intell 2023 4 5 6 1166014 10.3389/frai.2023.1166014 37091303 37091303 PMC10113434 · DOI
  13. [15]Cocci A Pezzoli M Lo Re M Russo GI Asmundo MG Fode M Cacciamani G Cimino S Minervini A Durukan E Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urology patients Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024 03 27 1 103 8 10.1038/s41391-023-00705-y 37516804 10.1038/s41391-023-00705-y 37516804 · DOI
  14. [16]Farrokhnia M Banihashem SK Noroozi O Wals A A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: implications for educational practice and research Innov Educ Teach Int 2023 03 27 1 15 10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [17]Garg RK Urs VL Agarwal AA Chaudhary SK Paliwal V Kar SK Exploring the role of ChatGPT in patient care (diagnosis and treatment) and medical research: a systematic review Health Promot Perspect 2023 09 11 13 3 183 91 10.34172/hpp.2023.22 37808939 37808939 PMC10558973 · DOI
  16. [19]Vedula SS Ghazi A Collins JW Pugh C Stefanidis D Meireles O Hung AJ Schwaitzberg S Levy JS Sachdeva AK Artificial intelligence methods and artificial intelligence-enabled metrics for surgical education: a multidisciplinary consensus J Am Coll Surg 2022 06 01 234 6 1181 92 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000190 35703817 00019464-202206000-00032 35703817 PMC10634198 · DOI
  17. [20]Collins JW Marcus HJ Ghazi A Sridhar A Hashimoto D Hager G Arezzo A Jannin P Maier-Hein L Marz K Valdastri P Mori K Elson D Giannarou S Slack M Hares L Beaulieu Y Levy J Laplante G Ramadorai A Jarc A Andrews B Garcia P Neemuchwala H Andrusaite A Kimpe T Hawkes D Kelly JD Stoyanov D Ethical implications of AI in robotic surgical training: a Delphi consensus statement Eur Urol Focus 2022 03 8 2 613 22 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.006 33941503 S2405-4569(21)00112-7 33941503 · DOI
  18. [21]Shinners L Aggar C Grace S Smith S Exploring healthcare professionals' perceptions of artificial intelligence: validating a questionnaire using the e-Delphi method Digit Health 2021 03 23 7 20552076211003433 10.1177/20552076211003433 33815816 10.1177_20552076211003433 33815816 PMC7995296 · DOI
  19. [22]McKenna HP The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? J Adv Nurs 1994 06 19 6 1221 5 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01207.x 7930104 7930104 · DOI
  20. [24]Neely A Production/operations management: research process and content during the 1980s Int J Oper Prod Manag 1993 13 1 5 18 10.1108/01443579310023963 · DOI
  21. [25]Meredith JR Raturi A Amoako‐Gyampah K Kaplan B Alternative research paradigms in operations J Oper Manag 1989 10 8 4 297 326 10.1016/0272-6963(89)90033-8 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [26]Akkermans H Bogerd P Vos B Virtuous and vicious cycles on the road towards international supply chain management J Econ Stud 1999 05 19 5/6 565 82 10.1108/01443579910260883 · DOI
  23. [27]Akkermans HA Bogerd P Yücesan E van Wassenhove LN The impact of ERP on supply chain management: exploratory findings from a European Delphi study Eur J Oper Res 2003 4 16 146 2 284 301 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00550-7 · DOI
  24. [28]Daniel EM White A The future of inter-organisational system linkages: findings of an international Delphi study Eur J Inf Syst 2017 12 19 14 2 188 203 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000529 · DOI
  25. [30]Lam K Iqbal FM Purkayastha S Kinross JM Investigating the ethical and data governance issues of artificial intelligence in surgery: protocol for a Delphi study JMIR Res Protoc 2021 02 22 10 2 e26552 10.2196/26552 33616543 v10i2e26552 33616543 PMC7939941 · DOI
  26. [31]Boulkedid R Abdoul H Loustau M Sibony O Alberti C Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review PLoS One 2011 6 6 e20476 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476 21694759 PONE-D-11-05412 21694759 PMC3111406 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [32]Humphrey-Murto S Varpio L Wood TJ Gonsalves C Ufholz LA Mascioli K Wang C Foth T The use of the Delphi and other consensus group methods in medical education research: a review Acad Med 2017 10 92 10 1491 8 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001812 28678098 28678098 · DOI
  28. [33]Houben G Lenie K Vanhoof K A knowledge-based SWOT-analysis system as an instrument for strategic planning in small and medium sized enterprises Decis Support Syst 1999 8 26 2 125 35 10.1016/s0167-9236(99)00024-x · DOI
  29. [37]McMillan SS King M Tully MP How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques Int J Clin Pharm 2016 06 38 3 655 62 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x 26846316 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x 26846316 PMC4909789 · DOI
  30. [38]Denecke K May R Investigating conversational agents in healthcare: application of a technical-oriented taxonomy Procedia Comput Sci 2023 219 1289 96 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.413 · DOI
  31. [39]Xygi E Andriopoulos AD Koutsomitropoulos DA Question answering chatbots for biomedical research using transformers Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication 2023 ICAIIC 2023 February 20-23, 2023 Bali, Indonesia 10.1109/icaiic57133.2023.10066979 · DOI
  32. [40]Saigaonkar S Narawade V Predicting chronic diseases using clinical notes and fine-tuned transformers Proceedings of the IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference 2022 IBSSC 2022 December 8-10, 2022 Mumbai, India 10.1109/ibssc56953.2022.10037512 · DOI
  33. [41]López-García G Jerez JM Ribelles N Alba E Veredas FJ Transformers for clinical coding in Spanish IEEE Access 2021 05 13 9 72387 97 10.1109/access.2021.3080085 · DOI
  34. [42]Gao Y Miller T Xu D Dligach D Churpek MM Afshar M Summarizing patients' problems from hospital progress notes using pre-trained sequence-to-sequence models Proc Int Conf Comput Ling 2022 10 2022 2979 91 36268128 36268128 PMC9581107
  35. [43]Nooralahzadeh F Gonzalez NP Frauenfelder T Fujimoto K Krauthammer M Progressive transformer-based generation of radiology reports Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing 2021 EMNLP 2021 November 7-11, 2021 Punta Cana, Dominican Republic 10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.241 · DOI
  36. [44]Tian S Erdengasileng A Yang X Guo Y Wu Y Zhang J Bian J He Z Transformer-based named entity recognition for parsing clinical trial eligibility criteria Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics 2021 BCB '21 August 1-4, 2021 Gainesville, FL 10.1145/3459930.3469560 PMC8373041 34414397 · DOI
  37. [45]Langlais É Thériault-Lauzier P Marquis-Gravel G Kulbay M So DY Tanguay JF Ly HQ Gallo R Lesage F Avram R Novel artificial intelligence applications in cardiology: current landscape, limitations, and the road to real-world applications J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2023 06 16 3 513 25 10.1007/s12265-022-10260-x 35460017 10.1007/s12265-022-10260-x 35460017 · DOI
  38. [46]Banja JD Hollstein RD Bruno MA When artificial intelligence models surpass physician performance: medical malpractice liability in an era of advanced artificial intelligence J Am Coll Radiol 2022 07 19 7 816 20 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.11.014 35120881 S1546-1440(22)00005-9 35120881 · DOI · Paper page
  39. [47]May R Biermann C Krüger J Saake G Leich T A systematic mapping study of security concepts for configurable data storages Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A 2022 SPLC '22 September 12-16, 2022 Graz, Austria 10.1145/3546932.3546994 · DOI
  40. [48]Raza S Osivand Pour P Bashir SR Fairness in machine learning meets with equity in healthcare arXiv Preprint posted online on August 14, 2023. 10.1609/aaaiss.v1i1.27493 · DOI
  41. [49]Denecke K Baudoin CR A review of artificial intelligence and robotics in transformed health ecosystems Front Med (Lausanne) 2022 9 795957 10.3389/fmed.2022.795957 35872767 35872767 PMC9299071 · DOI
  42. [50]Greco CM Simeri A Tagarelli A Zumpano E Transformer-based language models for mental health issues: a survey Pattern Recognit Lett 2023 03 167 204 11 10.1016/j.patrec.2023.02.016 · DOI
  43. [51]Vasey B Nagendran M Campbell B Clifton DA Collins GS Denaxas S Denniston AK Faes L Geerts B Ibrahim M Liu X Mateen BA Mathur P McCradden MD Morgan L Ordish J Rogers C Saria S Ting DS Watkinson P Weber W Wheatstone P McCulloch P Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI BMJ 2022 05 18 377 e070904 10.1136/bmj-2022-070904 35584845 35584845 PMC9116198 · DOI · Paper page
  44. [52]Kelly S Kaye SA Oviedo-Trespalacios O What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? a systematic review Telemat Inform 2023 02 77 101925 10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925 · DOI
  45. [53]Kokol P Vošner HB Kokol M Završnik J The quality of digital health software: should we be concerned? Digit Health 2022 06 16 8 20552076221109055 10.1177/20552076221109055 35746952 10.1177_20552076221109055 35746952 PMC9210082 · DOI
  46. [54]Sezgin E Sirrianni J Linwood SL Operationalizing and implementing pretrained, large artificial intelligence linguistic models in the US health care system: outlook of generative pretrained transformer 3 (GPT-3) as a service model JMIR Med Inform 2022 02 10 10 2 e32875 10.2196/32875 35142635 v10i2e32875 35142635 PMC8874824 · DOI
  47. [58]Porsdam Mann S Earp BD Nyholm S Danaher J Møller N Bowman-Smart H Hatherley J Koplin J Plozza M Rodger D Treit PV Renard G McMillan J Savulescu J Generative AI entails a credit–blame asymmetry Nat Mach Intell 2023 05 04 5 5 472 5 10.1038/s42256-023-00653-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denecke, K., May, R., LLMHealthGroup, & Rivera Romero, O.
Affiliations
  • Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH)
  • Harz University of Applied Sciences (DE)
  • Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Corresponding author
Denecke, Kerstin
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2024-05-13
Volume
26
Pages
e52399
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394967854
Cited by
111
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 9
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ARBOR - Bern University of Applied Sciences Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • BFH: ARBOR
Funders
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Government of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
large language models, health care, clinical decision support, natural language processing, clinical documentation, patient education, cybersecurity risks, privacy risks, algorithmic bias, ethical considerations, health informatics, nursing informatics, LLM adoption, patient data security, individualized care, medical education, Delphi consensus, transformer models
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Delivery of Health Care, Delphi Technique, Humans, Medical Informatics, Natural Language Processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review