Cited by 99Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIMachine Learning in Healthcare

Algorithmovigilance—Advancing methods to analyze and monitor artificial intelligence-driven health care for effectiveness and equity

Open access
Embi, Peter J.·2021·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Yoonyoung Park, ScD; Jianying Hu, PhD; Moninder Singh, PhD; Issa Sylla, BA; Irene Dankwa-Mullan, MD, MPH; Eileen Koski, MPhil; Amar K. Das, MD, PhD

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4622

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinicians may ignore alerts, over-trust outputs, misunderstand scores, or use the tool outside its intended scope.

    “Clinicians may ignore alerts, over-trust outputs, misunderstand scores, or use the tool outside its intended scope.”

    From The AI Hospital Formulary: A Practical Governance Framework for Prescribing, Monitoring, and Deprescribing Artificial Intelligence in Hospitals (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

    The JAMA Network section (page not specified) discusses users interpreting algorithmic outputs differently, lacking trust, and becoming overly reliant on outputs. It also describes variation in deployment and application. It does not specifically address clinicians ignoring alerts, misunderstanding scores, or using a tool outside its intended scope. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Embi, P. J.
Affiliations
Regenstrief Institute Inc, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2021-04-15
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
e214622
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3153651148
Cited by
99
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
algorithmic surveillance, artificial intelligence in healthcare, algorithmic fairness, health equity, algorithmic monitoring, algorithmic transparency, algorithmic accountability
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Health Facilities, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review