Cited by 13Technology Use by Older AdultsAging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Development Trends and Prospects of Technology-Based Solutions for Health Challenges in Aging over the Past 25 Years: Bibliometric Analysis

Open access
Liu, Lu, Wang, Xiu-Ling, Cheng, Nuo, Yu, Fu-Min, Li, Hui-Jun, Mu, Yang, Yuan, Yonghui, Dong, Jia-Xin +4 more·2024·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: As the global population ages, we witness a broad scientific and technological revolution tailored to meet the health challenges of older adults. Over the past 25 years, technological innovations, ranging from advanced medical devices to user-friendly mobile apps, are transforming the way we address these challenges, offering new avenues to enhance the quality of life and well-being of the aging demographic. Objective: This study aimed to systematically review the development trends in technology for managing and caring for the health of older adults over the past 25 years and to project future development prospects. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of literatures related to technology-based solutions for health challenges in aging, published up to March 18, 2024. The search was performed using the Web of Science Core Collection, covering a span from 1999 to 2024. Our search strategy was designed to capture a broad spectrum of terms associated with aging, health challenges specific to older adults, and technological interventions. Results: A total of 1133 publications were found in the Web of Science Core Collection. The publication trend over these 25 years showed a gradual but fluctuating increase. The United States was the most productive country and participated in international collaboration most frequently. The predominant keywords identified through this analysis included “dementia,” “telemedicine,” “older-adults,” “telehealth,” and “care.” The keywords with citation bursts included “telemedicine” and “digital health.” Conclusions: The scientific and technological revolution has significantly improved older adult health management, particularly in chronic disease monitoring, mobility, and social connectivity. The momentum for innovation continues to build, with future research likely to focus on predictive analytics and personalized health care solutions, further enhancing older adults’ independence and quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/63367

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The United States leads in the number of articles on technology for aging.

    “Based on a bibliometric analysis concerning technology for aging, the USA leads in the number of articles, demonstrating its role as a forerunner in technological innovation for older adults [41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]Ronquillo Y Meyers A Korvek SJ Digital health StatPearls 2023 5 1 2024-09-10 Treasure Island, FL StatPearls Publishing https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470260/ 29262125

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, L., Wang, X.-L., Cheng, N., Yu, F.-M., Li, H.-J., Mu, Y., Yuan, Y., Dong, J.-X., Wu, Y.-D., Gong, D.-X., Wang, S., & Zhang, G.-W.
Affiliations
  • First Hospital of China Medical University (CN)
  • Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (CN)
  • Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute (CN)
  • China Medical University (CN)
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2024-09-20
Volume
26
Pages
e63367
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402317996
Cited by
13
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Department of Science and Technology of Liaoning Province (2023JH2)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFC2006401, 2020YFC2006406)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
aging, older adults, telemedicine, digital health, dementia, chronic disease monitoring, mobility, social connectedness, quality of life, research trends, citation bursts
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Humans, Quality of Life, Bibliometrics, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review